Go to first unread
Back
to top
Where are the worst and best places in London??
Watch
Announcements
Report
#2
I live in a place called Walthamstow which is in East London. 75% of it is a dump.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
(Original post by senz72)
I live in a place called Walthamstow which is in East London. 75% of it is a dump.
Posted from TSR Mobile
I live in a place called Walthamstow which is in East London. 75% of it is a dump.
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Report
#4
What do you mean by 'best'? Is this in terms of low crime rate or things to do?
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
(Original post by yennibubs)
What do you mean by 'best'? Is this in terms of low crime rate or things to do?
Posted from TSR Mobile
What do you mean by 'best'? Is this in terms of low crime rate or things to do?
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Report
#6
(Original post by ThenAaliyahSaid)
I've been there like three times it's pretty bad but I think Whitechapel is the slums as well as North West London excluding Golders Green
I've been there like three times it's pretty bad but I think Whitechapel is the slums as well as North West London excluding Golders Green
I have no idea how London can be so bad when there was so much cash sploshing around back in 2005.
It's completely odd. :/
1
reply
Report
#7
(Original post by senz72)
Whitechapel is quite bad.
I have no idea how London can be so bad when there was so much cash sploshing around back in 2005.
It's completely odd. :/
Whitechapel is quite bad.
I have no idea how London can be so bad when there was so much cash sploshing around back in 2005.
It's completely odd. :/
London has an extremely wide range of wealth. You can have areas of extreme poverty and deprivation very close to areas of massive wealth and stunning mansions. A lot of areas that were once considered slums are now "up-and-coming" as property prices rise, but the distribution of wealth is still very uneven.
0
reply
Report
#8
(Original post by Helenia)
Because most of it wasn't sploshing around Whitechapel...
London has an extremely wide range of wealth. You can have areas of extreme poverty and deprivation very close to areas of massive wealth and stunning mansions. A lot of areas that were once considered slums are now "up-and-coming" as property prices rise, but the distribution of wealth is still very uneven.
Because most of it wasn't sploshing around Whitechapel...
London has an extremely wide range of wealth. You can have areas of extreme poverty and deprivation very close to areas of massive wealth and stunning mansions. A lot of areas that were once considered slums are now "up-and-coming" as property prices rise, but the distribution of wealth is still very uneven.
0
reply
Report
#9
(Original post by Helenia)
Because most of it wasn't sploshing around Whitechapel...
London has an extremely wide range of wealth. You can have areas of extreme poverty and deprivation very close to areas of massive wealth and stunning mansions. A lot of areas that were once considered slums are now "up-and-coming" as property prices rise, but the distribution of wealth is still very uneven.
Because most of it wasn't sploshing around Whitechapel...
London has an extremely wide range of wealth. You can have areas of extreme poverty and deprivation very close to areas of massive wealth and stunning mansions. A lot of areas that were once considered slums are now "up-and-coming" as property prices rise, but the distribution of wealth is still very uneven.
0
reply
Report
#10
(Original post by ThenAaliyahSaid)
Just wondering
Just wondering
To summarize, Crime is actually highest in the centre so you're actually safer in Peckham than you are in Soho and most of London looks pretty much the same with a few small pockets of really nice and really crappy looking.
0
reply
Report
#12
(Original post by ThenAaliyahSaid)
Just wondering
Just wondering
0
reply
Report
#13
(Original post by brent_)
Worst: Between Brixton, Hackney, Stratford and Walthamstow. I lived there and had the worst time of my life
Worst: Between Brixton, Hackney, Stratford and Walthamstow. I lived there and had the worst time of my life
0
reply
Report
#15
(Original post by ThenAaliyahSaid)
I've been there like three times it's pretty bad but I think Whitechapel is the slums as well as North West London excluding Golders Green
I've been there like three times it's pretty bad but I think Whitechapel is the slums as well as North West London excluding Golders Green
0
reply
Report
#17
(Original post by Alpha brah)
One of my best friends is from Stratford, I've been to visit her and it doesn't seem as bad as they make out though? Where did you live?
One of my best friends is from Stratford, I've been to visit her and it doesn't seem as bad as they make out though? Where did you live?
0
reply
Report
#18
Camden is unique in that it's a bit of a dump, but a fun dump.
Spent my teenage years in the utopia that is KL.
(Original post by brent_)
I live now in King's lynn in Norfolk now. I lived 2 years in each of those mention above aside from Stratford, I lived there for 8 months. I would say Stratford is not that bad, but crime rate wise, it is one of the worst places around London imo.
I live now in King's lynn in Norfolk now. I lived 2 years in each of those mention above aside from Stratford, I lived there for 8 months. I would say Stratford is not that bad, but crime rate wise, it is one of the worst places around London imo.
0
reply
Report
#19
I've lived in a Borough called Bromley virtually my whole life which is a great place to live yet not many people know about it (even though it is the largest Borough in London).
However, Bromley's next door neighbours Lewisham and Croydon are more well known. Although not for the right reasons.
Apparently Tower Hamlets is probably the most run-down place in London. The best I think is Kensington and Chelsea.
However, Bromley's next door neighbours Lewisham and Croydon are more well known. Although not for the right reasons.
Apparently Tower Hamlets is probably the most run-down place in London. The best I think is Kensington and Chelsea.
0
reply
Report
#20
(Original post by rockrunride)
Camden is unique in that it's a bit of a dump, but a fun dump.
Spent my teenage years in the utopia that is KL.
Camden is unique in that it's a bit of a dump, but a fun dump.
Spent my teenage years in the utopia that is KL.
Love the place
Cheaper than other nice areas like Chelsea but within 15 mins walk of the stunning Primrose Hill
0
reply
X
Quick Reply
Today on TSR
-
Struggling with your personal statement?Catch our Q&A with Surrey Uni on Thursday
- How are you feeling about 2021 A levels?
- What was your best year?
- Things you wish you knew before uni
- Year 13 and don't know what I'm doing