they're both rubbish, though the former is more rubbish than the latter.
finally bush got a vote! lol - was feeling a bit bad for him as he must of felt left out!
Both compare nothing to their formers.
This is like comparing a potato to a tomato. What's the point? The political structure of both countries are too different to judge them. Bush may not influence as much as Blair does in the legislative process and visa versa in other areas.
Even though I'm not a fan of him, I'd have to say Tony Blair.
He's had a good impct on schools, what with introducing Curriculum 2000 and Literacy Hour, both have had a good impact on primary school children especially.
Tony Blair has also dramatically improved hospitals, despite the recent media coverage.
Also, if it wasn't for labour, only a small percentage of British students would be able to go to uni, as the labour government made it accessible to all...