The Student Room Group

lim(n->0 +/- 0)(1/(1+e^(1/n)))

how are these found? for right and left handed sides of limits?
how is that even defined.................
I think this is the limit you're asking for:

limn±011+e(1/n)\displaystyle\lim_{n\to \pm0} \frac{1}{1+e^{(1/n)}}

This means the limit of the function as it approaches from the left of n=0 and the right of n=0

To find either, you need to find the value of 11+e(1/n)\frac{1}{1+e^{(1/n)}} when it approaches n=0 from the left or right hand side. The simplest way to do that is to calculate the values of the function at some very small positive n and some very small negative n (e.g. 0.0001 and -0.0001)
Reply 2
Original post by EpsilonSigma
I think this is the limit you're asking for:

limn±011+e(1/n)\displaystyle\lim_{n\to \pm0} \frac{1}{1+e^{(1/n)}}

This means the limit of the function as it approaches from the left of n=0 and the right of n=0

To find either, you need to find the value of 11+e(1/n)\frac{1}{1+e^{(1/n)}} when it approaches n=0 from the left or right hand side. The simplest way to do that is to calculate the values of the function at some very small positive n and some very small negative n (e.g. 0.0001 and -0.0001)

so when are you not allowed to this? or can you always do stuff like this (the taking a value close to it)?
I had no idea of this.
(edited 10 years ago)
Reply 3
Original post by cooldudeman
so when are you not allowed to this? or can you always do stuff like this (the taking a value close to it)?
I had no idea of this.


Completely ignore the above post, it's essentially attempting to guess, rather than actually proving anything. Use the definition of limits, and any sum, product, quotient and power rules you may have.
Reply 4
Original post by BlueSam3
Completely ignore the above post, it's essentially attempting to guess, rather than actually proving anything. Use the definition of limits, and any sum, product, quotient and power rules you may have.


you know the thing is that I've never cone across these rules in my lectures or my lecture notes. I have heard of them in combinatorics though but that's the only thing. I guess I'll just search them up.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 5
Original post by cooldudeman
you know the thing is that I've never cone across these rules in my lectures or my lecture notes. I have heard of them in combinatorics though but that's the only thing. I guess I'll just search them up.

Posted from TSR Mobile


You may have heard of them under the name "algebra of limits".
Reply 6
Original post by BlueSam3
You may have heard of them under the name "algebra of limits".


oh yeah of course.
Original post by BlueSam3
Completely ignore the above post, it's essentially attempting to guess, rather than actually proving anything. Use the definition of limits, and any sum, product, quotient and power rules you may have.


Given how ambiguous the first post of this thread is, I don't think I'm at fault entirely here. Besides, I said "simplest" for a reason; it is a very simple way of doing it that provides and example of what is meant by the limit notation. In this case it just so happens to be accurate to several thousand decimal places of the correct answer for the right and left hand limit.
Reply 8
Original post by EpsilonSigma
Given how ambiguous the first post of this thread is, I don't think I'm at fault entirely here. Besides, I said "simplest" for a reason; it is a very simple way of doing it that provides and example of what is meant by the limit notation. In this case it just so happens to be accurate to several thousand decimal places of the correct answer for the right and left hand limit.


It's not simple - it's wrong. This is analysis. Guessing doesn't work. "Roughly" doesn't work. If you don't understand analysis, kindly avoid posting in analysis threads.

Quick Reply

Latest