How can we criticise A.J Ayer's Verification Principle and his 'god talk is evidently Watch

GB6991
Badges: 8
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 6 years ago
#1
Hi, I'm looking for strong arguments against Ayer's claims that only empirically verifiable claims are meaningful, especially using that as his basis for challenging religious experience?


Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
TSR Learn Together
Badges: 9
Rep:
?
#2
Report 6 years ago
#2
Hi there,

While you're waiting for an answer, did you know we have 300,000 study resources that could answer your question in TSR's Learn together section?

We have everything from Teacher Marked Essays to Mindmaps and Quizzes to help you with your work. Take a look around.

If you're stuck on how to get started, try creating some resources. It's free to do and can help breakdown tough topics into manageable chunks. Get creating now.

Thanks!

Not sure what all of this is about? Head here to find out more.
0
reply
WannaGetAnA
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#3
Report 6 years ago
#3
The verification principle is, in itself, unverifiable, because there is no way that we can possibly know that only empirical statements are meaningful.

Also, John Hick argues that Ayer was not successful in proving that religious statements are not verifiable. He spoke of the Parable of the Celestial City, in which two men are walking down a road and argue about whether the road leads to a celestial city. Hick draws the analogy between this and the claims made by the believer about God and heaven. He argued that religious statements are empirically verifiable - we will know when we die if there is a God and an afterlife.

However, some have criticised Hick, saying that when we die, we may not necessarily have the same senses to perceive things, and if there is no afterlife, there will be no one to do the verifying.
0
reply
ChanelDeme
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#4
Report 5 years ago
#4
You could right about the implications of his argument... If u believe what he states (that everything which cannot be verified or empirically tested is nonsense) then we doubt life itself as you can't test or verify emotions such as love or relationships with people ... As well as morals or beliefs which society has as these cannot b tested or verified and therefore are 'meaningless'
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

University open days

  • Norwich University of the Arts
    Postgraduate Open Day Postgraduate
    Thu, 23 Jan '20
  • SOAS University of London
    Development Studies, Interdisciplinary Studies, Anthropology and Sociology, Languages, Cultures and Linguistics, Arts, Economics, Law, History, Religions and Philosophies, Politics and International Studies, Finance and Management, East Asian Languages & Cultures Postgraduate
    Sat, 25 Jan '20
  • University of Huddersfield
    Undergraduate Open Day Undergraduate
    Sat, 25 Jan '20

How many universities have you heard back from?

0 (97)
12.97%
1 (94)
12.57%
2 (94)
12.57%
19.39%
22.59%
19.92%

Watched Threads

View All
Latest
My Feed