Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    I'm doing a project on incidence geometry, and for the introduction I'm trying to give it some historical context.

    They key points I've got jotted down are
    * rudimentary geometry is known in pre-history, from empirical observations necessary to make basic measurements, layout buildings and fields, etc.
    * Thales of Miletus deduces new geometrical results from the empirical facts he learns in Egypt and Babylon. This effectively makes him the first (known) mathematician, and starts geometry as a field of inquiry in it's own right.
    * Euclid sets out the first axiomatic system for the class of geometries which still bear his name. Archimedes, Apollonius, and various others further develop the field in the following centuries.
    * in the seventeenth century Descartes develops coordinate systems and transforms, leading to analytic geometry. At around the same time Desargues considers idealised structures at infinity, which give some early results on the real projective plane.
    * in the eighteenth century Euler sets out the basics of affine geometry
    * in the early nineteenth century Bolyai and Lobachevsky independently develop hyperbolic geometry. Riemann establishes Riemannian geometry and incidentally elliptic geometry, and later Klein is able to unify elliptic, Euclidean, and parabolic geometries within projective geometry, as part of the Erlangen program.
    * in part because of questions about the foundations of mathematics, and also because of the proliferation of geometries, people set about finding new axiomatic systems. The best known are Tarski's and Hilbert's axioms. The early recognition of relations such as incidence prompts the development of synthetic geometry, as purely formal systems.
    * incidence geometry and ordered geometry continue to develop. Interest is bolstered by their close links to combinatorics, and in turn to computer science.

    Is there anything fundamentally wrong, or any important point that I've missed in any of that? Can anyone recommend a decent book or article on all this?
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by mmmpie)
    I'm doing a project on incidence geometry, and for the introduction I'm trying to give it some historical context.

    They key points I've got jotted down are
    * rudimentary geometry is known in pre-history, from empirical observations necessary to make basic measurements, layout buildings and fields, etc.
    * Thales of Miletus deduces new geometrical results from the empirical facts he learns in Egypt and Babylon. This effectively makes him the first (known) mathematician, and starts geometry as a field of inquiry in it's own right.
    * Euclid sets out the first axiomatic system for the class of geometries which still bear his name. Archimedes, Apollonius, and various others further develop the field in the following centuries.
    * in the seventeenth century Descartes develops coordinate systems and transforms, leading to analytic geometry. At around the same time Desargues considers idealised structures at infinity, which give some early results on the real projective plane.
    * in the eighteenth century Euler sets out the basics of affine geometry
    * in the early nineteenth century Bolyai and Lobachevsky independently develop hyperbolic geometry. Riemann establishes Riemannian geometry and incidentally elliptic geometry, and later Klein is able to unify elliptic, Euclidean, and parabolic geometries within projective geometry, as part of the Erlangen program.
    * in part because of questions about the foundations of mathematics, and also because of the proliferation of geometries, people set about finding new axiomatic systems. The best known are Tarski's and Hilbert's axioms. The early recognition of relations such as incidence prompts the development of synthetic geometry, as purely formal systems.
    * incidence geometry and ordered geometry continue to develop. Interest is bolstered by their close links to combinatorics, and in turn to computer science.

    Is there anything fundamentally wrong, or any important point that I've missed in any of that? Can anyone recommend a decent book or article on all this?
    The BSHM might be of some use.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: January 22, 2014
Poll
Do you think parents should charge rent?
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.