I've been given this assignment for one of my modules but the lecturers aren't much use.
Explain misrepresentation in the law of contract and discuss whether Fred has a possible claim under the Misrepresentation Act 1967.
Is it better to explain the law then apply it to the problem or do it at the same time?
x Turn on thread page Beta
Problem question answer layout watch
- Thread Starter
- 21-01-2014 22:34
- 25-01-2014 10:10
While you're waiting for an answer, did you know we have 300,000 study resources that could answer your question in TSR's Learn together section?
We have everything from Teacher Marked Essays to Mindmaps and Quizzes to help you with your work. Take a look around.
If you're stuck on how to get started, try creating some resources. It's free to do and can help breakdown tough topics into manageable chunks. Get creating now.
Not sure what all of this is about? Head here to find out more.