The Student Room Group

do girls prefere guys to be circumcised or normal

hey there ladies, just a weird questions that has been bothering me for a few weeks now.
i overheard a conversation in a cafe the other day where two women where discussing whether it was better to have a bloke who is circumcised or not.
the first liked the clean and safe aspect of it, from a medical point of view.
the second was saying that the skin that gets cut off is what gives most the pleasure, then the first said that when it is circumcised you will hardly ever get a bad taste.
I was circumcised a long time ago and have never given it much thought but it's now on my mind.
i spoke to my other half about it but didn't really get a straight answer 'different people were different in bed' she did say she liked the taste.
anyone else hold an opinion on this ?

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1

firstly, any bloke who considers giving a girl an option needs their head checked.

secondly, If your a grubby bastard and dont wash properly, you're going to be a grubby bastard who doesnt wash properly, mutilated or not.
As long as they've got one.
Reply 3
I really don't care, provided the bloke is hygienic!
Repeat what others have said, hygiene is important etc. Also don't worry about appearance... performance is more of a concern isn't it?
El Scotto

firstly, any bloke who considers giving a girl an option needs their head checked.

secondly, If your a grubby bastard and dont wash properly, you're going to be a grubby bastard who doesnt wash properly, mutilated or not.



lol well yeah i agree any girl who is picky like that, and yeah i suppose long as us guys are hygenic as well.
Reply 6
But being circumsised, automatically increases your hygiene dramatically, because most of the dirt gets trapped under that foreskin. So most circumsised men are naturally more hygenic anyway.
Nilz
But being circumsised, automatically increases your hygiene dramatically, because most of the dirt gets trapped under that foreskin. So most circumsised men are naturally more hygenic anyway.

In that case, dont have nails, get them removed. They trap dust. Same with fingers and toes, get them removed too! :p: If you're hygienic, there's no difference.
Nilz
But being circumsised, automatically increases your hygiene dramatically, because most of the dirt gets trapped under that foreskin. So most circumsised men are naturally more hygenic anyway.


Shouldn't women also have their labia and clitoral hood removed at birth then? I mean, it's more hygenic, isn't it....
Reply 9
poor male babies in the states have no say. ouch
Reply 10
westkingwolf
hey there ladies, just a weird questions that has been bothering me for a few weeks now.
i overheard a conversation in a cafe the other day where two women where discussing whether it was better to have a bloke who is circumcised or not.
the first liked the clean and safe aspect of it, from a medical point of view.
the second was saying that the skin that gets cut off is what gives most the pleasure, then the first said that when it is circumcised you will hardly ever get a bad taste.
I was circumcised a long time ago and have never given it much thought but it's now on my mind.
i spoke to my other half about it but didn't really get a straight answer 'different people were different in bed' she did say she liked the taste.
anyone else hold an opinion on this ?


What a delightful conversation. What would Mary Whitehouse say?
Reply 11
shouldn't hurt if done as a child, it's adult circum that would hurt
Reply 12
probably what she said when she was alive "AIDS is a judgment we have brought upon ourselves" hehe. true.
Reply 13
I guess it's a trade off between easier hygiene and loss of sensitivity - and that sensitivity is not in the skin that they cut off (stupid women), it is because the head is exposed therefore it loses its sensitivity.

What's the point anyway, you aren't going to change it.
Prot
poor male babies in the states have no say. ouch


In Israel it happens to all Jewish guys at 10 days old, it is an extremly old tradition. The other day my dad said that in the army medical in Israel when you join the army there, the highest score anyone can get is 97% because apprntly you loose 3% for being circumsized.
Reply 15
*shrugs* in the UK non-circumsised is more common so I guess it's more what girls are used to. Circumcised is obviously gonna be cleaner in general and therefore I would imagine taste better in some weird kinda way (guessing now, never given head to a circumcised guy). That said you also run the risk of *cough* chaffage, and it generally takes more stimulation to make the guy cum. But then that means that he could keep going for longer. Meh it's all prefernce and if you're wearing a condom they'll never know...
Appanouki
that sensitivity is not in the skin that they cut off (stupid women), it is because the head is exposed therefore it loses its sensitivity.


In addition to the "ridged bands" mentioned above, thousands of coiled fine-touch receptors (Meissner’s corpuscles) constitute the most important sensory component of the penis [1]. The foreskin contains branches of the dorsal nerve and between 10,000 and 20,000 specialized erotogenic nerve endings of several types, which are capable of sensing slight motion and stretch, subtle changes in temperature, and fine gradations in texture [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12].


Oh rly? :rolleyes: Stupid women, huh?
Reply 17
foxo
What a delightful conversation. What would Mary Whitehouse say?


'Uncircumcised', probably.
I prefer circumcised.
Looks nicer. You can see what you're working with. Foreskins freak me out a bit, they're sort of... suspiciously movable.

Haven't 'tasted' a guy who's not circumcised but my boyfriend IS, and he doesn't really taste of much, just sort of salty.
You can see what you're working with.


As opposed to with uncircumcised, how?