What's your favourite proof in maths?

Watch this thread
ThePerfectScore
Badges: 0
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
Report Thread starter 8 years ago
#1
Inspired by the favourite number thread. Feel free to sketch up the details of the proof if you wish to. It doesn't have to be your favourite proof of a main theorem or result. It could be the proof or calculation of some simple equation, or even some cool method that you have seen somewhere (your book etc). For example, deriving the quadratic formula by completing the square. I'll start.

Gauss' derivation of the sum of first n natural numbers.

Let S be the sum. Then

S = 1+2+3+....+(n-1)+n ---------------- (1)

But writing it from the other side

S = n+(n-1)+(n-2)+...+2+1 -------- (2)

Adding (1) and (2) together

2S = n(n+1)

So S = [n(n+1)]/2.
:drool:

1
reply
the bear
Badges: 20
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report 8 years ago
#2
Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes... it is brilliant, yet simple enough for a Higher Level GCSE child to understand.

http://www.math.utah.edu/~pa/math/q2.html
1
reply
ThePerfectScore
Badges: 0
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
Report Thread starter 8 years ago
#3
(Original post by the bear)
Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes... it is brilliant, yet simple enough for a Higher Level GCSE child to understand.

http://www.math.utah.edu/~pa/math/q2.html
Euclid was a clever man! Way ahead of his time! :eek:
0
reply
the bear
Badges: 20
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#4
Report 8 years ago
#4
(Original post by ThePerfectScore)
Euclid was a clever man! Way ahead of his time! :eek:
indeed. he has brought pleasure to untold millions of school children.
0
reply
Noble.
Badges: 17
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#5
Report 8 years ago
#5
- Fundamental theorem of algebra via Liouville's theorem
- Sub-additivity of the Lebesgue measure by constructing pairwise disjoint sets
- Proving any open subset of \mathbb{R} is the union of, at most, countably many disjoint, open intervals via defining an equivalence relation.

I don't really keep an ongoing list of favourite proofs, but the above are a few recent proofs I've seen that stand out as being particularly neat.
0
reply
interstitial
Badges: 18
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#6
Report 8 years ago
#6
Proof that \sqrt k is irrational when  \sqrt{k} \not\in \mathbb N , but k \in \mathbb N Gotta love that infinite descent :teehee:

And also the proof that \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^\infty \dfrac{1}{r^2} = \dfrac{\pi ^2}{6}

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
FireGarden
Badges: 14
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#7
Report 8 years ago
#7
I have a fair few proofs I'm very fond of, but here's a real nice one:

Theorem: There exist two positive irrationals x,y such that x^y is rational.

Proof: If \sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}} is rational, take x=y=\sqrt{2}.

If \sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}} is irrational, take x=\sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}},\ y=\sqrt{2}.


Another theorem, whose proof once came with advice from the lecturer: "You need to be able to write this proof in the snow with pee even at night when drunk"

There is no surjection :A\mapsto \mathcal{P}(A)
0
reply
Hodor
Badges: 3
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#8
Report 8 years ago
#8
The proof that the real numbers are uncountable, using Baire's theorem:


Write  \mathbb{R} = \bigcup\limits_{x \in \mathbb{R}} \{x\} . For each  x, \{x\} is closed in  \mathbb{R} and has empty interior, so, since  \mathbb{R} is a complete metric space, Baire says that the union cannot be countable.
1
reply
JPL9457
Badges: 10
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#9
Report 8 years ago
#9
Image
5
reply
interstitial
Badges: 18
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#10
Report 8 years ago
#10
(Original post by JPL9457)
Image
Division by zero :hand:

This may have worked somewhere else, but this is the maths thread where people actually know about maths

Posted from TSR Mobile
2
reply
You Failed
Badges: 13
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#11
Report 8 years ago
#11
(Original post by majmuh24)
Division by zero :hand:

This may have worked somewhere else, but this is the maths thread where people actually know about maths

Posted from TSR Mobile
I'm pretty sure he was taking the ****, hence the massive troll face.
1
reply
thewagwag
Badges: 6
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#12
Report 8 years ago
#12
Cantor's diagonal argument. Proof that there are infinities of different sizes, by showing how there must be more real numbers than whole numbers, despite both sets being infinite


Posted from TSR Mobile
1
reply
username1258398
Badges: 19
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#13
Report 8 years ago
#13
(Original post by thewagwag)
Cantor's diagonal argument. Proof that there are infinities of different sizes, by showing how there must be more real numbers than whole numbers, despite both sets being infinite
I second this! Such an original, simple line of thought. Makes you wonder how in the banana he came up with it.
0
reply
JPL9457
Badges: 10
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#14
Report 8 years ago
#14
(Original post by majmuh24)
Division by zero :hand:

This may have worked somewhere else, but this is the maths thread where people actually know about maths

Posted from TSR Mobile
erm i'll have you know i got a 5 in my maths SAT, i am a very capable mathematician
2
reply
Autistic Merit
Badges: 3
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#15
Report 8 years ago
#15
(Original post by JPL9457)
Image
Not going to lie, I graduated with a first in maths but have no idea how I would go about contradicting this proof.
1
reply
interstitial
Badges: 18
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#16
Report 8 years ago
#16
(Original post by You Failed)
I'm pretty sure he was taking the ****, hence the massive troll face.
I know, I was joking

(Original post by JPL9457)
erm i'll have you know i got a 5 in my maths SAT, i am a very capable mathematician
:eek: I only got a level 4, does that make me stupid (I got a level 3 in Year 2 though )

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
The Polymath
Badges: 16
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#17
Report 8 years ago
#17
(Original post by majmuh24)
Proof that \sqrt k is irrational when  k > 0 and  \sqrt{k} \not\in \mathbb N Gotta love that infinite descent :teehee:
What?

k=\frac{1}{4} > 0 \\\sqrt{k}=\frac{1}{2}\not\in \mathbb N
3
reply
interstitial
Badges: 18
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#18
Report 8 years ago
#18
(Original post by StrangeBanana)
I second this! Such an original, simple line of thought. Makes you wonder how in the banana he came up with it.
His theorem about power sets was also so simple, yet so obvious, it extended infinities beyond the simple 1,2,3,4.. and gave rise to uncountable infinities as well

His continuum hypothesis is pretty interesting as well

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
JPL9457
Badges: 10
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#19
Report 8 years ago
#19
(Original post by Autistic Merit)
Not going to lie, I graduated with a first in maths but have no idea how I would go about contradicting this proof.
congrats, what uni?

is there a proper professional way to contradict a proof? because my way would just be saying, in step 5, the whole thing = 0
0
reply
interstitial
Badges: 18
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#20
Report 8 years ago
#20
(Original post by The Polymath)
What?

k=\frac{1}{4} > 0 \\\sqrt{k}=\frac{1}{2}\not\in \mathbb N
I meant to put when k is an integer I'll change it now

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest

Does school Maths prepare people well enough for the future?

Yes, it gives everyone a good foundation for any future path (13)
36.11%
Somewhat, if your future involves maths/STEM (16)
44.44%
No, it doesn't teach enough practical life skills (7)
19.44%
Something else (tell us in the thread) (0)
0%

Watched Threads

View All