Danny Gull
Badges: 0
Report Thread starter 7 years ago
The question is 70 marks and is the standard AS history question, with the 5 sources and a question posed,

I find myself describing the sources instead of doing what im supposed to be and i could do with some help
Badges: 2
Report 7 years ago
Haha I have to do these as well on Churchill. It's really not fun, anyways I first highlight the question and then go through all the sources. Decide whether they are for or against the question.

Then write a short introduction. It doesn't need to be very long as you don't actually get any marks for it.

You want to group your sources into two big paragraphs (the ones for and the ones and the ones against). I follow the general formula of saying which source I'm using, maybe use a quote from the source, state what the source says and how it's shows what your trying to prove. Then explain any strengths or limitations of the source and maybe a little on the provenance. Finally sum it up with a judgment on the source. Then move onto your next source.

At the end sum it all up in a nice conclusion with a lot of judgement and which source is most valid and why.

It takes a while to get used to it but after a while you should be alright c:

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
new posts
to top
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.


Are you tempted to change your firm university choice on A-level results day?

Yes, I'll try and go to a uni higher up the league tables (36)
Yes, there is a uni that I prefer and I'll fit in better (11)
No I am happy with my choice (71)
I'm using Clearing when I have my exam results (9)

Watched Threads

View All