The Student Room Group

Ronaldinho or Messi in their primes?

Scroll to see replies

Reply 60

I utterly despise threads like this.

Reply 61

Original post by stuffsgrooveyman
(Pele is the king obvs though)


You're wrong. Please post your argument.

Reply 62

Pele>Ronaldinho=Zidane>Messi>Ronaldo

Pele = 3 world cups
Ronaldinho = 1 world cup
Zidane = 1 world cup + epic headbutt
all in a tougher era without all this diving nonsense nowadays

Messi+Ronaldo = 0 world cups even with the bias of the referees towards attacking players these days i.e calling a foul if anyone gets touched


Football is a team game. Forget the CV's and judge with your eyes, watch him play. Messi is the greatest.

But of course, if Argentina win the World Cup, Messi will suddenly be a better dribbler than Best, better free kick taker than Beckham, better goalscorer than Romario. He'll suddenly become a better footballer. :rolleyes:

Tired cliches. I'm just glad I'm able to think for myself and judge players on their actual quality, on what I see.

Reply 63

Might be better technically with the ball but he doesn't bring the numbers pele brings.
1366 apperances 1282 goals
For his ENTIRE career


I suggest you read up and look at the real numbers. It's closer to 500. Half of those 'league' goals were actually against poor regional teams, not teams in the national league -- it's the equivalent of Rooney scoring hat tricks against a Lancashire league including Burnley, FC United, Altrincham etc and counting them as Premier League goals.

Again you are just looking at numbers, not on the player's quality.

Pele is a senile old fraud.

Reply 64

Just a question, how many of those comparing Maradona, Pele, Ronaldinho, Ronaldo and Messi have watched them all play?
:redface:

Also, some serious over rating of Zizou on this thread. As magnificent as he was, I honest to god don't think he was a better player than Iniesta, and you don't see him included in the all time discussion?
Messi's in a different class altogether.
(edited 11 years ago)

Reply 65

Original post by Wilfred Little
I suggest you read up and look at the real numbers. It's closer to 500. Half of those 'league' goals were actually against poor regional teams, not teams in the national league -- it's the equivalent of Rooney scoring hat tricks against a Lancashire league including Burnley, FC United, Altrincham etc and counting them as Premier League goals.

Again you are just looking at numbers, not on the player's quality.

Pele is a senile old fraud.


Why so much hate against Pele. If those numbers were inflated by playing in a weak league, surely his numbers would have dropped off at international level where his goal scoring and tournament winning record is exponentially better than messi's while playing in a harder period where the refs didn't blow for every sneeze

Reply 66

Original post by elpistolero7
Just a question, how many of those comparing Maradona, Pele, Ronaldinho, Ronaldo and Messi have watched them all play?
:redface:


I've seen loads of Maradona, Messi, Ronaldinho and Ronaldo. Not as much of Pele, but the game advances and players naturally become better across the ages -- take sprinting for example, the world record goes down and down as sprinters/training improves.

The arguments for Pele are further weakened by his embellishment of his own achievements and knack of downplaying those of his team mates.

Messi is the best, it is obvious.

Reply 67

Disagree with the OP. Messi is 26; he's hardly reached his prime, let alone passed it. There's no indication that he's declining or stagnating either, if anything, his numbers (as well as his actual performances week in week out) suggest that he's still improving. So to be fair to Messi, the comparison should be made once Messi is 33, which is in 7 years.

Anyway, simple answer: Messi is the better player, by far.

Spoiler

(edited 11 years ago)

Reply 68

Why so much hate against Pele. If those numbers were inflated by playing in a weak league, surely his numbers would have dropped off at international level where his goal scoring and tournament winning record is exponentially better than messi's while playing in a harder period where the refs didn't blow for every sneeze


So what? The refs didn't blow for every sneeze -- the defenders were worse as well. And he was playing in the greatest international team of all time, or at least one of.

Also it's hilarious how people use the Xaviesta argument to discredit Messi, yet ignore the fact Pele wasn't even the star player in his Brazil teams.

Reply 69

Original post by Wilfred Little
I've seen loads of Maradona, Messi, Ronaldinho and Ronaldo. Not as much of Pele, but the game advances and players naturally become better across the ages -- take sprinting for example, the world record goes down and down as sprinters/training improves.

The arguments for Pele are further weakened by his embellishment of his own achievements and knack of downplaying those of his team mates.

Messi is the best, it is obvious.


Well I've seen a lot of 3 of the 4 you mention, not Maradona, just some videos here and there.

What Maradona did with Napoli was utterly spectacular though, and he does look some player from the few videos I've seen.

I'm inclined to think Messi's the best, he's certainly the best I've seen, but its hard to compare across eras. When Maradona was in his pomp, tackles that result in 3 match bans were yellow card offenses + he played in arguably the greatest defensive era of Italian football in his prime.

Reply 70

who has the more natural talent?

Reply 71

Original post by elpistolero7
Well I've seen a lot of 3 of the 4 you mention, not Maradona, just some videos here and there.

What Maradona did with Napoli was utterly spectacular though, and he does look some player from the few videos I've seen.

I'm inclined to think Messi's the best, he's certainly the best I've seen, but its hard to compare across eras. When Maradona was in his pomp, tackles that result in 3 match bans were yellow card offenses + he played in arguably the greatest defensive era of Italian football in his prime.


I have no bad words for Maradona. He would probably make my top 3 based on what I've seen (though I don't want to overthink it), Forget the numbers, I'm talking naturally gifted footballers when a ball is on some grass.

I agree with comparing across eras too mate. I can accept people preferring the 'best of his generation' thing.

Reply 72

Messi and its not even close. Messi is just a cold ruthless machine.

I will however say that Ronaldinho was the most amazing to watch.

Also people putting Ronaldo and Ronaldinho ahead of Messi. Just :rofl:

Reply 73

Original post by Wilfred Little
I have no bad words for Maradona. He would probably make my top 3 based on what I've seen (though I don't want to overthink it), Forget the numbers, I'm talking naturally gifted footballers when a ball is on some grass.

I agree with comparing across eras too mate. I can accept people preferring the 'best of his generation' thing.


Some of his dribbles on youtube are just insane. You can really see the Messi comparisons, really uncanny at times.

Yep the era thing is far more appropriate. I definitely am of the opinion that Messi could cut it and be a god in any era though. They guy's just unreal.

Reply 74

Original post by Wilfred Little
So what? The refs didn't blow for every sneeze -- the defenders were worse as well. And he was playing in the greatest international team of all time, or at least one of.

Also it's hilarious how people use the Xaviesta argument to discredit Messi, yet ignore the fact Pele wasn't even the star player in his Brazil teams.

Pele has 3 world cups and over a 1000 goals. Messi doesn't. simples!!:colone:

Reply 75

Original post by The Assassin
who has the more natural talent?


Both the same. Some say Ronaldinho, but imo that is because Messi has had to adapt his play to a certain (Guardiola) system much earlier in his career whereas Ronaldinho was given full freedom & no responsibilities under Rijkaard. As I said, in his teens Messi showed just as much genius as Ronaldinho. But he went on to become a professional, Ronaldinho didn't.

Reply 76

Lampard > Zidane

Reply 77

Pele has 3 world cups and over a 1000 goals. Messi doesn't. simples!!:colone:


Where's Peles Champions leagues?

Reply 78

Pele has 3 world cups and over a 1000 goals. Messi doesn't. simples!!:colone:


:rolleyes:

We're not discussing who has the better numbers or CV, we are discussing who is/was the better footballer, so I have removed your numbers argument from this discussion.

Regards, Wilf.

Reply 79

Original post by Eloades11
Lampard > Zidane

Where's the neg button?