I think it depends on whether it is graduate or postgraduate study. Imagine doing a research placement where you have to analyse data, create databases and conduct literature reviews. Yet your other friend reads two journals - literally! When it comes to marks guess who gets the highest grade? Oh yes, the person who read two journals.
The argument was that I had not met one of the learning criteria as well as the others. The assessment was a portfolio which included a poster, a reflection and a diary. I knew I was in trouble from the start because I had done all this work that I had submitted to my lecturer that was not getting marked. The comments were that my work was not reflected in the portfolio, well of course it wasn't. I felt like it was such a waste of time and an embarrassment.
Then we had a poster presentation. I put what I had found from the work I had done (i.e. lit review, data analysis). Then I found out I had done it wrong. Turns out that I should have put how I did everything (i.e. the process) as well. I changed it before submitting but the feedback given was exactly the same as at the presentation. I do agree with some of the feedback, however, the instructions should have been made more clear. I had mentioned this in a student representative meeting but again was too much hassle.
I found out a position opened up for a research assistant at the University. I did not apply as I thought it was morally corrupt to pay people for a job that I did for free as part of a course. Especially when you put in all the hard work and the supervisor benefits, not you. Oh and after all that you don't even get a reference because it is too much hassle on their part. P.s. this is specific to a module and the lecturers responsible, not everyone as some lecturers really go out of their way to help you.