The Student Room Group

Maths at Oxford or Cambridge - How Did You Decide!?!?

Scroll to see replies

Reply 20

learn the ****ing organ.

Reply 21

ShaneP

Finally, with regards to the haunting questions that Maths at Oxford entails, I would much rather be in that situation than apply to Cambridge and not get an offer. I really wouldn't want to study anywhere apart from Oxbridge, however naive that sounds. The question underlying this all is whether I could handle that disappointment or not.


If you would not be able to handle a rejection then do not apply to either, it is not worth it.

Reply 22

^^ How could you tell in advance whether you would be able to handle it? I don't think not getting in would ruin anyone's life.

Reply 23

OK, some of your comments have been extremely helpful, and the fact that I may have as much chance of getting an offer from Cambridge as I do from Oxford has definitely helped make my decision easier.

I'm now pretty sure I want to apply to Cambridge, so will now arrange some visits to my shortlisted colleges and make a decision on which one to apply to.

Thanks for all your help! :yy:

Reply 24

ShaneP
OK, some of your comments have been extremely helpful, and the fact that I may have as much chance of getting an offer from Cambridge as I do from Oxford has definitely helped make my decision easier.

I'm now pretty sure I want to apply to Cambridge, so will now arrange some visits to my shortlisted colleges and make a decision on which one to apply to.

Thanks for all your help! :yy:


Hurrah! More competition! Well, I suppose not, really, since you're not considering Emmanuel, but still.

Reply 25

Chumbaniya
Hurrah! More competition! Well, I suppose not, really, since you're not considering Emmanuel, but still.
Hehe, there actually seems to be an awful lot of people from this forum applying for maths at Cambridge :biggrin:

Reply 26

ad absurdum
Hehe, there actually seems to be an awful lot of people from this forum applying for maths at Cambridge :biggrin:


There were last time round as well, and there are for Oxbridge generally.

Reply 27

ad absurdum
Hehe, there actually seems to be an awful lot of people from this forum applying for maths at Cambridge :biggrin:


True, but then Cambridge does have a very large undergraduate intake for maths, and in general it seems the people on TSR are academically above average, so it's what would be expected really. As far as I'm aware, the number of Oxbridge applications from TSR members is quite high, and I think I remember reading at some point that the sucess rate in obtaining offers among TSR members is better than the overall sucess rate. Good news for us, eh?

Reply 28

Well I went for Oxford but thats because I'm a prospective Maths&Phil'er and Cambridge don't run that course.

But one serious point I would make is that the difference in prestige between Oxford and Cambridge is seriously unlikely to make a major impact on you. Much more likely to make an impact is a crap degree class because you chose a city you don't enjoy and consequently flunked.

So choose the place you think suits you best.

Reply 29

Chumbaniya
True, but then Cambridge does have a very large undergraduate intake for maths, and in general it seems the people on TSR are academically above average, so it's what would be expected really. As far as I'm aware, the number of Oxbridge applications from TSR members is quite high, and I think I remember reading at some point that the sucess rate in obtaining offers among TSR members is better than the overall sucess rate. Good news for us, eh?


Its difficult to tell, on account of people with rejections being less likely to post about it, but members do seem to get quite a lot of offers compared to how many apply. A lot of the people applying probably come here looking for Oxbridge info in the first place (I did) and you'd expect the success rate to be higher among those who actively seek out that kind of help.

Reply 30

One fairly pressing question. Where are lectures held for first year undergraduates at Cambridge? Is it at the Sir Isaac Newton Institute? If not, in what year are they held there?

That would be quite a disappointment because I love that building, and wanted to apply to Churchill primarily because it was right next to it!

Reply 31

ShaneP
One fairly pressing question. Where are lectures held for first year undergraduates at Cambridge? Is it at the Sir Isaac Newton Institute? If not, in what year are they held there?


The Issac Newton Institute is for researchers, people who have completed their degrees.

I think it might only be post-doc research (post-PhD) but I cannot remember so do not quote me on this.

Reply 32

Lusus Naturae
The Issac Newton Institute is for researchers, people who have completed their degrees.

I think it might only be post-doc research (post-PhD) but I cannot remember so do not quote me on this.


So where are lectures held then?

Reply 33

ShaneP
So where are lectures held then?


Cockcroft Lecture Theatre, New Museums Site

http://www.cam.ac.uk/map/v3/drawmap.cgi?mp=nmus;tl=New%20Museums%20Site

Reply 34

Wow! I was expecting Cambridge to have huge lead on Oxford - evidently not!! What I'm planning to do, if I turn out to be good at Maths (!), is go to Oxford, which is a realistic proposition, and then go for Part III at Cambridge. That way, I get to have a highly respected Maths degree, followed by the thing all mathmos / theoretical physicists want, Part III! I've not really got a problem with STEP, as such, it's just I have little self-confidence. I think my decision may well come down to what I'm being placed in for Maths next year. I was originally placed in Set 4 of 4, and then got boosted to Set 3 very quickly. But in position wise for my mock, I came at the bottom of Set 1 / top of Set 2, so I'm a little grumpy, but I'm still a Set 3 Mathematician, and traditionally, (successful) Cambridge Mathmos are from Sets 1 & 2. I'm in a bit of a muddle. Meh.

Reply 35

Illusionary


Wow - that's quite far away. I may have to reconsider my college choice in that case.

But hey, a bike ride is sometimes good in the morning........rite? ;no;

Reply 36

Illusionary


Excellent, if I get in I'll barely have to get out of bed in the morning.

Reply 37

henryt
Wow! I was expecting Cambridge to have huge lead on Oxford - evidently not!! What I'm planning to do, if I turn out to be good at Maths (!), is go to Oxford, which is a realistic proposition, and then go for Part III at Cambridge. That way, I get to have a highly respected Maths degree, followed by the thing all mathmos / theoretical physicists want, Part III! I've not really got a problem with STEP, as such, it's just I have little self-confidence. I think my decision may well come down to what I'm being placed in for Maths next year. I was originally placed in Set 4 of 4, and then got boosted to Set 3 very quickly. But in position wise for my mock, I came at the bottom of Set 1 / top of Set 2, so I'm a little grumpy, but I'm still a Set 3 Mathematician, and traditionally, (successful) Cambridge Mathmos are from Sets 1 & 2. I'm in a bit of a muddle. Meh.


Jesus, you must go to an amazing school if your third set of mathematicians apply to Oxford. In my college, out of a year of a thousand students, only three want to apply to Oxbridge maths degrees and most years the college won't have any sucessful applicants to read maths at either university, and only around 8 sucessful Oxbridge applications in total.

Reply 38

Chumbaniya
Jesus, you must go to an amazing school if your third set of mathematicians apply to Oxford. In my college, out of a year of a thousand students, only three want to apply to Oxbridge maths degrees and most years the college won't have any sucessful applicants to read maths at either university, and only around 8 sucessful Oxbridge applications in total.


We have a year of about 100 and ~10 Oxbridge apps. Two maths offers from Cam this year but I don't think that happens that often, although we do have a very strong maths department. The idea of 2nd set people applying though - we don't even have sets!

Reply 39

Chumbaniya
Jesus, you must go to an amazing school if your third set of mathematicians apply to Oxford. In my college, out of a year of a thousand students, only three want to apply to Oxbridge maths degrees and most years the college won't have any sucessful applicants to read maths at either university, and only around 8 sucessful Oxbridge applications in total.
Unfortunately, going to an "amazing school" doesn't make you particularly clever/self-confident - it only has that effect after exam results! Also, I think my school is one of the better ones with Oxbridge admissions - 48% of students (last year) ~ 75 students getting places. And my school is very proud of it's record in Maths - it's basically the only subject where all the teachers are amazing. There are a few who have a really odd style, or a few who only like clever people, but they still make good mathematicians out of us! This year, there are 40 of us doing F. Maths, and about 110 doing Single (out of 180 - so only 30 people don't do Maths). But Set 3 is hardly great. We've got someone from Set 4 applying for Maths at Oxford too. But that's not really the dilemma... Arg.

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.