Is this enough for an AS sociology essay question (24 marks) ? Watch

Demilee123
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#1
Using material from Item 2B and elsewhere assess the contribution of functionalist sociologists to our understanding of the family (24marks)

I don't think this would be enough but i genuinely don't know what else to write, any help please ?

Functionalists have a very positive view on the family; some even compare society and its institutions to the human body, using the family as the heart. This essay will be assessing the functionalist views of the family, for example Talcott Parsons theories and Murdock’s.
Murdock was one of the main functionalist thinkers; he looked at many different societies and believed that the family was the most important institution in all of the societies. He argued that the family has four vital roles; sexual regulation, reproduction, economic and educational. Like mentioned in item 2B Murdock believed these roles to be essential to the smooth running of society.
Talcott Parsons was another functionalist thinker; however unlike Murdock he focused more on American families and rather than insisting the family has four vital functions he argued it had only two main functions. These are Primary socialisation and the stabilisation of the adult personality. However Marxists would argue that primary socialisation reproduces social inequalities and maintains class inequalities.
Another theory of Parsons is the ‘warm bath theory’; this is the idea that the family can be seen as a warm bath that soaks away the cares and stresses of everyday life. Although feminists would criticise this theory as being too optimistic and ignoring the dark side of the family, for example domestic violence and child abuse.
Parsons also stated that the nuclear family is the best family for the modern ages as it is more functional; for example it is more geographically mobile that the extended family that in the past was more common. However Marxists are critical of this view as they believe that the nuclear family only serves the needs of the ruling classes.
The biological division of labour in the family is another of Parsons theories. He said that men have an instrumental role, working and being the bread winner, whereas women have an expressive role, homemaking and emotional support. Parsons sees these roles as natural whereas feminists see families as patriarchal and Marxist feminist Fran Ansley even said that in marriage women are the ‘takers of ****’.
Overall the functionalist view of the family is an extremely positive one; one that could even be criticized as too positive and naive to everyday problems of the family, one that places too much emphasis on the nuclear family only to be critical of the other family types and one that only looks at the good contributions of the family to society rather than the good and bad.
0
reply
leanne1996
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#2
Report 4 years ago
#2
(Original post by Demilee123)
Using material from Item 2B and elsewhere assess the contribution of functionalist sociologists to our understanding of the family (24marks)

I don't think this would be enough but i genuinely don't know what else to write, any help please ?

Functionalists have a very positive view on the family; some even compare society and its institutions to the human body, using the family as the heart. This essay will be assessing the functionalist views of the family, for example Talcott Parsons theories and Murdock’s.
Murdock was one of the main functionalist thinkers; he looked at many different societies and believed that the family was the most important institution in all of the societies. He argued that the family has four vital roles; sexual regulation, reproduction, economic and educational. Like mentioned in item 2B Murdock believed these roles to be essential to the smooth running of society.
Talcott Parsons was another functionalist thinker; however unlike Murdock he focused more on American families and rather than insisting the family has four vital functions he argued it had only two main functions. These are Primary socialisation and the stabilisation of the adult personality. However Marxists would argue that primary socialisation reproduces social inequalities and maintains class inequalities.
Another theory of Parsons is the ‘warm bath theory’; this is the idea that the family can be seen as a warm bath that soaks away the cares and stresses of everyday life. Although feminists would criticise this theory as being too optimistic and ignoring the dark side of the family, for example domestic violence and child abuse.
Parsons also stated that the nuclear family is the best family for the modern ages as it is more functional; for example it is more geographically mobile that the extended family that in the past was more common. However Marxists are critical of this view as they believe that the nuclear family only serves the needs of the ruling classes.
The biological division of labour in the family is another of Parsons theories. He said that men have an instrumental role, working and being the bread winner, whereas women have an expressive role, homemaking and emotional support. Parsons sees these roles as natural whereas feminists see families as patriarchal and Marxist feminist Fran Ansley even said that in marriage women are the ‘takers of ****’.
Overall the functionalist view of the family is an extremely positive one; one that could even be criticized as too positive and naive to everyday problems of the family, one that places too much emphasis on the nuclear family only to be critical of the other family types and one that only looks at the good contributions of the family to society rather than the good and bad.
I'd say that's really good! Just try to be more evaluative and bring in more criticisms to go for the extra marks, for example postmodernism in the conclusion and state whether the functionalist theories of the family apply to today's society or not and maybe that Marxists would go against Parsons view of the roles being natural and in fact the ruling class express this ideology through the ideological state apparatus to and it is not natural at all - I think it was althusser who talked about the ideological state apparatus
Good stuff though!
0
reply
Demilee123
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#3
(Original post by leanne1996)
I'd say that's really good! Just try to be more evaluative and bring in more criticisms to go for the extra marks, for example postmodernism in the conclusion and state whether the functionalist theories of the family apply to today's society or not and maybe that Marxists would go against Parsons view of the roles being natural and in fact the ruling class express this ideology through the ideological state apparatus to and it is not natural at all - I think it was althusser who talked about the ideological state apparatus
Good stuff though!
Thank you that's really helpful; I'll try incorporating them into it :borat:
0
reply
leanne1996
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#4
Report 4 years ago
#4
(Original post by Demilee123)
Thank you that's really helpful; I'll try incorporating them into it :borat:
No worries! Good luck with your exam!
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

University open days

  • University of Roehampton
    Department of Life Sciences; Department of Psychology Undergraduate
    Thu, 21 Feb '19
  • Edge Hill University
    Undergraduate and Postgraduate - Campus Tour Undergraduate
    Thu, 21 Feb '19
  • St George's, University of London
    Postgraduate Open Evening Postgraduate
    Thu, 21 Feb '19

Is the plastic tax enough to protect the environment?

Yes (1)
1.49%
No (66)
98.51%

Watched Threads

View All