# Confused by wolfram alpha solution for solving log equation for y...Watch

#1
A linear fit between "x" and "log_10(y)", and gets the following function:

log_10(y) = -1.4 x + 5.1

Write out the formula for the relationship between the original variables, x and y.

I tried solving this using wolfram alpha but can't understand their solution:

Their first step is:

x + 0.31021 log_10(y) = 3.64286

Now it looks like they've divided by 1.4 and moved the x to the LHS but 1/1.4 isn't 0.31021? it's 0.714285, I can't figure out where they got this from?

Thanks for the help
0
5 years ago
#2
Hi there,

While you're waiting for an answer, did you know we have 300,000 study resources that could answer your question in TSR's Learn together section?

We have everything from Teacher Marked Essays to Mindmaps and Quizzes to help you with your work. Take a look around.

If you're stuck on how to get started, try creating some resources. It's free to do and can help breakdown tough topics into manageable chunks. Get creating now.

Thanks!

Not sure what all of this is about? Head here to find out more.
0
5 years ago
#3
(Original post by mh1985)
...
Your interpretation of the output of wolfram alpha is incorrect. In wolfram alpha, is used to denote and not .

is approximately 0.31021 .

You shouldn't need more than a calculator to do this question.

Note that .
0
#4
(Original post by Ateo)
Your interpretation of the output of wolfram alpha is incorrect. In wolfram alpha, is used to denote and not .

is approximately 0.31021 .

You shouldn't need more than a calculator to do this question.

Note that .
I changed it in wolfram alpha so it was using not ln though?
I still don't understand why in the quote why we need to divide by the log ? ? All I can see to do is divide by 1.4?
0
5 years ago
#5
(Original post by mh1985)
I changed it in wolfram alpha so it was using not ln though?
I still don't understand why in the quote why we need to divide by the log ? ? All I can see to do is divide by 1.4?
You did input the base ten log indeed, but the output provided by wolfram was in base e. As for where what I wrote comes from, note that

this is just the change of base rule for logarithms
1
#6
(Original post by Ateo)
...
Ah thank you, that clears it up
0
X

new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### University open days

• Regent's University London
Thu, 19 Sep '19
• Durham University
Fri, 20 Sep '19
• Loughborough University
Fri, 20 Sep '19

### Poll

Join the discussion

Rock (115)
24.78%
Pop (108)
23.28%
Jazz (20)
4.31%
Classical (23)
4.96%
Hip-Hop (87)
18.75%
Electronic (37)
7.97%
Indie (74)
15.95%