Complex Numbers - a few questions.
Watch this threadPage 1 of 1
Skip to page:
interstitial
Badges:
18
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
I have a few questions about complex numbers so I figured I may as well put them all into one big thread 
1. When doing calculus with complex numbers, is i just treated as another constant? I haven't seen much mention of complex calculus anywhere, so I figured I should ask
For example, what is 
2. Can you extend the natural logarithm to complex and negative numbers by expressing in exponential form and using log laws? For example
3. Are equations with complex coefficients solved in the same way as equations with real coefficients? For example, if you had
, would we just solve this using the quadratic formula?
Thanks for helping!
Posted from TSR Mobile

1. When doing calculus with complex numbers, is i just treated as another constant? I haven't seen much mention of complex calculus anywhere, so I figured I should ask


2. Can you extend the natural logarithm to complex and negative numbers by expressing in exponential form and using log laws? For example

3. Are equations with complex coefficients solved in the same way as equations with real coefficients? For example, if you had

Thanks for helping!

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Smaug123
Badges:
15
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report
#2
(Original post by majmuh24)
I have a few questions about complex numbers so I figured I may as well put them all into one big thread
1. When doing calculus with complex numbers, is i just treated as another constant? I haven't seen much mention of complex calculus anywhere, so I figured I should ask
For example, what is 
2. Can you extend the natural logarithm to complex and negative numbers by expressing in exponential form and using log laws? For example
3. Are equations with complex coefficients solved in the same way as equations with real coefficients? For example, if you had
, would we just solve this using the quadratic formula?
Thanks for helping!
I have a few questions about complex numbers so I figured I may as well put them all into one big thread

1. When doing calculus with complex numbers, is i just treated as another constant? I haven't seen much mention of complex calculus anywhere, so I figured I should ask


2. Can you extend the natural logarithm to complex and negative numbers by expressing in exponential form and using log laws? For example

3. Are equations with complex coefficients solved in the same way as equations with real coefficients? For example, if you had

Thanks for helping!


2. Yes, sort of.



3. Yes, exactly. We can factorise equations in the same way over the complex numbers as we can over the reals.
0
reply
Lord of the Flies
Badges:
19
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
Report
#3
To add to the above:
1. Your example is "calculus with complex numbers" and not "calculus in the complex numbers". The former is not terribly interesting, whereas the latter [i.e. complex analysis] is fascinating and powerful. Most of the neatness behind complex analysis stems from the notion of differentiability: although the definition is essentially the same as in the real case, it is in fact a far stronger requirement [essentially because we need the limit to exist and agree when approached from all directions, and not just two]. For instance, if
is once-differentiable (holomorphic) it is automatically infinitely differentiable. Or, if
is analytic in a simply connected domain
then its integral along any contour in
is automatically 0. There are no parallels to these in real analysis.
2.
is multivalued because
is multivalued. The remedy is to choose a branch (by making a branch cut i.e. making a slice in the complex plane so as to restrict a multivalued function to a single-valued one). The traditional choice for
is to restrict the argument to
in which case we write
1. Your example is "calculus with complex numbers" and not "calculus in the complex numbers". The former is not terribly interesting, whereas the latter [i.e. complex analysis] is fascinating and powerful. Most of the neatness behind complex analysis stems from the notion of differentiability: although the definition is essentially the same as in the real case, it is in fact a far stronger requirement [essentially because we need the limit to exist and agree when approached from all directions, and not just two]. For instance, if




2.



![(-\pi,\pi] (-\pi,\pi]](https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/latexrender/pictures/da/da1ddd3ef16dea6913baa1c321a72546.png)

0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
Back
to top
to top