You are Here: Home >< Maths

# integrating tan Watch

1. Hi,

I have to integrate tan, and I've used the two different approaches but neither give me the right answer. Below is my working, please could someone tell me what I've done wrong on either/both approaches?

. So when I saw this I thought it was quite a nice one as it related directly to the identity tan2x with no rearranging needed.

So I used the approach first but that give me a really small value that was way off:

which is way off.

So then I converted tan into sin/cos and integrated that way:

The answer in the book is 0.181
2. (Original post by marcsaccount)
Hi,

I have to integrate tan, and I've used the two different approaches but neither give me the right answer. Below is my working, please could someone tell me what I've done wrong on either/both approaches?

. So when I saw this I thought it was quite a nice one as it related directly to the identity tan2x with no rearranging needed.

So I used the approach first but that give me a really small value that was way off:

which is way off.

So then I converted tan into sin/cos and integrated that way:

The answer in the book is 0.181
Get yourself into radians (rather than degrees) and you'll be fine :L
3. (Original post by alexmufc1995)
Get yourself into radians (rather than degrees) and you'll be fine :L
Oh dear! The time and pain! Thanks for pointing it out!

Marc
4. (Original post by alexmufc1995)
Get yourself into radians (rather than degrees) and you'll be fine :L
is NOT what you have put. You do not integrate the numerator and denominator separately when integrating a rational function. This would actually be a logarithmic integral.
5. interestingly though, only the approach using natural logs gives the correct answer. Why wouldn't the sin/cos method work? Is my working above correct?
6. (Original post by brianeverit)
is NOT what you have put. You do not integrate the numerator and denominator separately when integrating a rational function. This would actually be a logarithmic integral.

thanks
7. (Original post by marcsaccount)
interestingly though, only the approach using natural logs gives the correct answer. Why wouldn't the sin/cos method work? Is my working above correct?
Because the numerator is the differential of the denominator (with a minus sign), so the integral is a natural log.

You can't just integrate the denominator and numerator, you would have to do it by parts. Although I doubt you would get an answer, at least not quickly.

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: April 16, 2014
Today on TSR

### Should I hide my grades on UCAS?

I don't want Oxford to know I only got an A...

### He wants to drop out of Cambridge?

Discussions on TSR

• Latest
Poll
Useful resources

## Make your revision easier

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Discussions on TSR

• Latest

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.