# Taylor series vs Maclaurin series

Watch
Announcements

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

In my textbook i have read that g(a) +g'(a)x/1! + g''(a)x^2/2! + g'''(a)x^3/3!..

is the taylor expansion of g(a+x). Isn't this just the maclaurin expansion?

is the taylor expansion of g(a+x). Isn't this just the maclaurin expansion?

0

reply

Report

#2

(Original post by

In my textbook i have read that g(a) +g'(a)x/1! + g''(a)x^2/2! + g'''(a)x^3/3!..

is the taylor expansion of g(a+x). Isn't this just the maclaurin expansion?

**MEPS1996**)In my textbook i have read that g(a) +g'(a)x/1! + g''(a)x^2/2! + g'''(a)x^3/3!..

is the taylor expansion of g(a+x). Isn't this just the maclaurin expansion?

The Taylor expansion around is

For a=0 it is known as Maclaurin series

THat is

Can you write me which one from the above that you have read in textbook?

0

reply

(Original post by

NO.

The Taylor expansion around is

For a=0 it is known as Maclaurin series

THat is

**ztibor**)NO.

The Taylor expansion around is

For a=0 it is known as Maclaurin series

THat is

**of g(a+x).**If you were to find the maclaurin series of g(a+x), ie. differentiate it then put x=0 into the differential and use these in the coefficients, you would get g(a) + g'(a)/1!x +g''(a)/2!x^2.... So it seems as though the maclaurin series and taylor series of g(a+x) are the same...

0

reply

Report

#4

(Original post by

but it says it is the taylor expansion

**MEPS1996**)but it says it is the taylor expansion

**of g(a+x).**If you were to find the maclaurin series of g(a+x), ie. differentiate it then put x=0 into the differential and use these in the coefficients, you would get g(a) + g'(a)/1!x +g''(a)/2!x^2.... So it seems as though the maclaurin series and taylor series of g(a+x) are the same...Simply put, The Taylor series is the general case and the Maclaurin series is just a unique case of Taylor.

Posted from TSR Mobile

0

reply

(Original post by

The Maclaurin series is just a special case of the Taylor series when a=0. It's only used for points around 0, because it's not such a good approximation away from there and we use the Taylor expansion instead.

Simply put, The Taylor series is the general case and the Maclaurin series is just a unique case of Taylor.

Posted from TSR Mobile

**majmuh24**)The Maclaurin series is just a special case of the Taylor series when a=0. It's only used for points around 0, because it's not such a good approximation away from there and we use the Taylor expansion instead.

Simply put, The Taylor series is the general case and the Maclaurin series is just a unique case of Taylor.

Posted from TSR Mobile

This seems to be what you would get if you were to find the maclaurin expansion of g(a+x).

0

reply

Report

#6

(Original post by

its just ive read that the taylor expansion of g(a+x) is: g'(a)/1!x +g''(a)/2!x^2....

This seems to be what you would get if you were to find the maclaurin expansion of g(a+x).

**MEPS1996**)its just ive read that the taylor expansion of g(a+x) is: g'(a)/1!x +g''(a)/2!x^2....

This seems to be what you would get if you were to find the maclaurin expansion of g(a+x).

The Taylor expansion is to do with f(x+a), the Maclaurin expansion is when a=0.

Posted from TSR Mobile

0

reply

Report

#7

**MEPS1996**)

its just ive read that the taylor expansion of g(a+x) is: g'(a)/1!x +g''(a)/2!x^2....

This seems to be what you would get if you were to find the maclaurin expansion of g(a+x).

0

reply

(Original post by

The usual form of the Taylor expansion is the one given by ztibor. If you put y = x+a in your version, so x = y-a, you basically get a rearrangement of the same thing.

**davros**)The usual form of the Taylor expansion is the one given by ztibor. If you put y = x+a in your version, so x = y-a, you basically get a rearrangement of the same thing.

0

reply

Report

#9

(Original post by

but its exactly the same as the macluarin expansion of g(a+x)...

**MEPS1996**)but its exactly the same as the macluarin expansion of g(a+x)...

many terms.

So there is need for nth order differentiability of f(x) at x=0 and not at x=a or y=x+a (except a=0)

and we calculate the derivative for x=0 so the will be powers of (x-0) in the series.

For x=a (a=/=0) it will be the Taylor series so that the derivative is calculates in x=a e.g. g'"(a)

but then there are powers of (x-a) in the series e.g (x-a)^3

In your post you gave the form so that for the derivatives you used the x=a substitution (which is g(x) around a), but at the powers you gave powers of x, that is (x-0) (which is g(x) around 0).

This is a contradiction except a=0;

0

reply

(Original post by

The Macalurin series of f(x) is an approximation for f(0) at x=0 in form of series of infinitely

many terms.

So there is need for nth order differentiability of f(x) at x=0 and not at x=a or y=x+a (except a=0)

and we calculate the derivative for x=0 so the will be powers of (x-0) in the series.

For x=a (a=/=0) it will be the Taylor series so that the derivative is calculates in x=a e.g. g'"(a)

but then there are powers of (x-a) in the series e.g (x-a)^3

In your post you gave the form so that for the derivatives you used the x=a substitution (which is g(x) around a), but at the powers you gave powers of x, that is (x-0) (which is g(x) around 0).

This is a contradiction except a=0;

**ztibor**)The Macalurin series of f(x) is an approximation for f(0) at x=0 in form of series of infinitely

many terms.

So there is need for nth order differentiability of f(x) at x=0 and not at x=a or y=x+a (except a=0)

and we calculate the derivative for x=0 so the will be powers of (x-0) in the series.

For x=a (a=/=0) it will be the Taylor series so that the derivative is calculates in x=a e.g. g'"(a)

but then there are powers of (x-a) in the series e.g (x-a)^3

In your post you gave the form so that for the derivatives you used the x=a substitution (which is g(x) around a), but at the powers you gave powers of x, that is (x-0) (which is g(x) around 0).

This is a contradiction except a=0;

0

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top