Land Law- absolutely boring or can it be interesting?

Where there is loads of debate... seriously its choka!! The mortgages and stuff like that are stuffed full of debate, as is the rational of 1925 act/2002 act etc etc... the doctrine of notice being replaced etc etc... you will come to know soon enough, but there is plenty to get your teeth into. Most interesting debate is when the burden of covenants should pass in my opinion.

Very interesting cos you can really apply everything you learn into every day life.

Will be studying Land law in my second year and have been reading up a little about it. There doesn't seem to be any juicy debates that are found in other modules like for instance the Omissions/Acts question (for criminal law) that was recently discussed on this forum.
It seems to me to be a lot of factual learning of cases and a good grasp of statutes. Obviously as I haven't covered the module in a great level of detail I may be wrong. Has anybody completed the module and found it interesting?
Can anybody briefly outline any good debates that are likely to come up in the course. Thanks.

Is Land Law generally preferred to EU law?

This all worries me as it suggests there is likely to be an influx of people into the profession who both (a) enjoy what they do and (b) are good at it.

I have consoled myself to date with the fact that my peers and myself have been able to trundle along for years with a frighteningly poor grasp of the law and below average enthusiasm. The ability to talk utter cr@p convincingly is sadly underrated these days.

Yikes, it may be time to pull our socks up....

Yours negligently

Chalks

Land is tricky, a lot of people really dont like it, a lot of people do. If you always favoured more sciency topics, then its said you'll prefer land because its all about precision.

What do you mean "precision"? If its "sciency" then that suggests its easier to apply and theres less room for debate, right?

This all worries me as it suggests there is likely to be an influx of people into the profession who both (a) enjoy what they do and (b) are good at it.

I have consoled myself to date with the fact that my peers and myself have been able to trundle along for years with a frighteningly poor grasp of the law and below average enthusiasm. The ability to talk utter cr@p convincingly is sadly underrated these days.

Yikes, it may be time to pull our socks up....

Yours negligently

Chalks

Science is hardly devoid of debate though is it?