The Student Room Group

Working Out could stunt growth?

Quick opinions on this would be helpful:

Basically, I'm 16 and have just started going to the gym. I've always heard rumours about working out stunting people's growth, and I personally know one guy (who must've started at about 13) who is now visibly mis-shaped because he tried to build muscle too young. I'm not wanting to become a bodybuilder here, nor am I particularly looking to build muscle, but would like to tone certain areas by using weight machines at the gym. Should I be worried about stunting my growth?

Reply 1

at 16 you should be alrite to start working on your muscles unless you haven't had a growth spurt yet. Its true that working out too early can stunt growth ( cant remember the medical reason)

Reply 2

menton
Its true that working out too early can stunt growth ( cant remember the medical reason)

Wikipedia disagrees.

"Orthopaedic specialists used to recommend that children avoid weight training because the growth plates on their bones might be at risk, but recent studies have shown that this concern is unfounded. The very rare reports of growth plate fractures in children who trained with weights occurred as a result of inadequate supervision, improper form or excess weight."

Reply 3

Heavy weight training is dangerous to anybody if you don't recognise your own limitations.

Reply 4

I reckon cause and effect are mixed up here.
Stunted growth leads to working out.

Reply 5

username24
I reckon cause and effect are mixed up here.
Stunted growth leads to working out.


hehe REP

Reply 6

well i did weights and i am 6ft , just dont anything hardcore....

Reply 7

Lifting weights can make you grow more as it releases hormones.

Reply 8

does not stunt growth.

Reply 9

:frown:

If it makes it any better, I'm over 6 foot, and I started (with gaps) when I was about 14.

Reply 10

Bis
:frown:

If it makes it any better, I'm over 6 foot, and I started (with gaps) when I was about 14.



Yep, I lift weights as well (have done for years) and I'm over 6ft. You do see a disproportionately large number of shorties at the gym though. Weird.

Reply 11

well i think its best if u could do non weight workouts in the meantime, but doing some weight lifting wouldn't hurt providing you dont lump on excessive weights etc.

Reply 12

username24
Yep, I lift weights as well (have done for years) and I'm over 6ft. You do see a disproportionately large number of shorties at the gym though. Weird.

Yeah, but that's usually due to their inadequacies they feel from being short, so they believe they can make up for it in size. How silly of them. For further elucidation, watch channel 5 on Monday at 9:00. It will also provide you with laughs, as Greggy doesn't admit to pumping himself full of synthol.

Reply 13

An article by Mel Siff

"While the emphasis on correctness of technique and graduated progressive loading is correct, those university texts are seriously misleading to perpetuate the myth that heavy resistance training stunts growth by prematurely closing the epiphyses.
If heavy resistance training is to be discouraged among youngsters, then one also has to warn against the dangers of any form of activity that imposes similar loading on the skeleton. The catch here is that any running, jumping, kicking and throwing can impose loads that easily exceed the loads encountered in controlled heavy resistance training.
I have performed many force plate and muscle tension tests on subjects during jumping, running, weightlifting and powerlifting and have measured forces which are invariably significantly greater during jumping and running than weightlifting with loads greater than one's bodymass. In fact, the impact forces imposed on the legs during jumping and landing can easily be more than four times bodyweight. Very few youngsters would ever be able to handle heavy enough squats to achieve that sort of skeletal loading!
Just think how difficult it would be to advise youngsters about the biomechanical risks of running and jumping in particular! Their play is replete with that sort of activity - and it is done in much greater volume than is ever done in a weight training environment.
Have the authors of those textbooks ever considered how the average 3-5 sets of 3-10 repetitions of squats, deadlifts, overhead presses, power cleans and whole body lifts (with the usual rest intervals between sets) can stunt growth more than thousands of foot contacts during running (in most youth sports) or hundreds of similar impacts during jumping and landing (e.g. in basketball, volleyball, soccer, football etc)?
So far I have yet come across sports scientists who compare the skeletal loading forces in different sports so as to arrive at the conclusion that weight training is the only exercise that selectively stunts human growth. Interesting, isn't it? It sounds like there is still a lot of uneducated bias around in the world of sports training.
I trust that those same authors of that textbook also pointed out the high injury rate caused to many bodily structures by popular school sports such as American football, rugby, soccer and basketball. If they did, then they would be justified in insisting that youngsters should not be exposed prematurely to these potentially hazardous activities!
Add to this the results of clinical records done by an orthopaedic surgeon / Sports Doctor colleague of mine who has studied records of youngsters exposed to long periods of weight training. As yet he has not found any significant correlation between weight training and pathological closing of epiphyses.
It is really about time that this growth stunting by weights myth were dispelled or at least compared scientifically against similar potential risks encountered in other sports. It is not simply that something is inherently dangerous, it is that anything can be dangerous if not done properly.
In conclusion we might add this GROWTH STUNTING belief as yet another Puzzle & Paradox in our ongoing collection of myths that confuse and befuddle so many fitness professionals! "