but doesn't normal biology do that tho
Critique the science not the author. If its a man who found a discovery or a woman what difference does it make, surely if its good science it should just be critiqued and peer reviewed, not based on the gender of someone. Smells of the very bias you are trying to remove being placed back here.
Feminism = always go full retard.
Science is science. Tacking anything on to the beginning of that is bad; science should and must stand on its own. 'Feminist' science is science with an agenda and science should have no agenda beyond the expansion of knowledge, else it isn't science. Indeed, your own interpretation of scientific facts supports this argument as your attempts to deny facts based on an abstract and illogical notion that they are somehow unjust is ludicrous and highly amusing.
Good lord why to feminists keep demanding nonsensical things
This is all coming from a guy (perhaps inspired by Dadaism) who is pretending to be the archetypal 80s feminist right? Which is kind of amusing, except that people seem to be falling for it.
Apologies if this Friendly Liberal character is a genuine person accurately conveying her beliefs and not just doing some sophisticated trolling.