cannocanoglu
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 6 years ago
#1
Hi, I was wondering if anyone had a good/clear evaluation for Levels or Processing and Reconstructive memory?
0
reply
Lilyghz
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#2
Report 6 years ago
#2
I didn't do reconstructive memory but I did do LOP!

Strengths of LOP include that it is supported by studies (e.g. Hyde & Jenkins who found that adding meaning to info when processing gives better memory, Craik & Tulving who found that deeper processing leads to better recall), research into memory processing links in with research with perception and selective attention so LOP is a stronger explanation than the multi store model and LOP explains the difference in the long term and short term store with depths of processing.

Weaknesses of LOP are that "deep" is not well defined by Craik & Lockhart as it could mean time spent processing, effort used to process or association with past experiences. LOP is also criticised for being descriptive as it does not explain how memory works. It is also conflicted by Morris et al. who found that the nature of the task determines the depth of processing. The time spent processing could be the reason for better memory of information rather than the level of processing. Lastly LOP only explains conscious recall and not automatic recall (explicit/implicit memory).

Good luck!!
0
reply
andy96
Badges: 5
Rep:
?
#3
Report 6 years ago
#3
hi guys- for 2 marks how would i write the aim for craik and tulving?

would this get two marks: "to investigate how deep, shallow and intermediate processing affects memory call to test the levels of processing"
0
reply
Lilyghz
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#4
Report 6 years ago
#4
(Original post by andy96)
hi guys- for 2 marks how would i write the aim for craik and tulving?

would this get two marks: "to investigate how deep, shallow and intermediate processing affects memory call to test the levels of processing"
Im not really sure but the way I've always written is "to investigate whether deeper processed information is recalled better and to see if deeper processing meant processing for a longer time."
0
reply
andy96
Badges: 5
Rep:
?
#5
Report 6 years ago
#5
(Original post by Lilyghz)
Im not really sure but the way I've always written is "to investigate whether deeper processed information is recalled better and to see if deeper processing meant processing for a longer time."
thank you! they're similar i suppose haha! x
0
reply
Lilyghz
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#6
Report 6 years ago
#6
(Original post by andy96)
thank you! they're similar i suppose haha! x
No worries! Exam is tomorrow!! How you feeling about it? I'm hoping the 12 marker isn't a describe and evaluate a study question Xx
0
reply
andy96
Badges: 5
Rep:
?
#7
Report 6 years ago
#7
(Original post by Lilyghz)
No worries! Exam is tomorrow!! How you feeling about it? I'm hoping the 12 marker isn't a describe and evaluate a study question Xx
I seriously hope not either! I'm more scared for unit 2 to be honest :/ wbu? x
0
reply
Lilyghz
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#8
Report 6 years ago
#8
(Original post by andy96)
I seriously hope not either! I'm more scared for unit 2 to be honest :/ wbu? x
I am as well.. Particularly about the biological approach.

Psychodynamic approach? Nailed it. Learning approach? Smashed it. Biological approach? :confused::confused::confused: do you by any chance have notes on the biological approach? Xx
0
reply
andy96
Badges: 5
Rep:
?
#9
Report 6 years ago
#9
(Original post by Lilyghz)
I am as well.. Particularly about the biological approach.

Psychodynamic approach? Nailed it. Learning approach? Smashed it. Biological approach? :confused::confused::confused: do you by any chance have notes on the biological approach? Xx
yepp i do! what do you find hard i could help you? x
0
reply
Lilyghz
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#10
Report 6 years ago
#10
(Original post by andy96)
yepp i do! what do you find hard i could help you? x
I have a hard time remembering how PET and MRI scans work though I'm alright with evaluating them.. And also the functioning of neurotransmitters? I can never get it.. X
0
reply
andy96
Badges: 5
Rep:
?
#11
Report 6 years ago
#11
okay so: neurotransmitters are chemical messengers which go through neurons and their synapses (the gap between neurons). Hormones on the other hand are also chemical messengers but they go through blood instead that's the only difference.

PET scans and MRI scans are both non-invasive (require no surgery)

PET scans have an injected radioactive tracer where glucose produces positrons (don't have to know what they are) and then they travel to the most active parts of the brain and on the screen you will see that the redder the parts of the brain are, the more activity there is in that area so scientists can see which behaviours are initiated by which part of the brain.

Then MRI scans are similar but unlike PET scans they show the structure of the brain (in 3D also) and a dye is injected into the patient so that the whole brain structure can be visible on the screen.

You can see tumours with both MRI and PET scans but MRI scans have disadvantages purely because you get put in that long tube and it lasts a long time producing a really loud noise which sucks. So people can feel claustrophobic! x
0
reply
andy96
Badges: 5
Rep:
?
#12
Report 6 years ago
#12
(Original post by Lilyghz)
I have a hard time remembering how PET and MRI scans work though I'm alright with evaluating them.. And also the functioning of neurotransmitters? I can never get it.. X
okay so: neurotransmitters are chemical messengers which go through neurons and their synapses (the gap between neurons). Hormones on the other hand are also chemical messengers but they go through blood instead that's the only difference.

PET scans and MRI scans are both non-invasive (require no surgery)

PET scans have an injected radioactive tracer where glucose produces positrons (don't have to know what they are) and then they travel to the most active parts of the brain and on the screen you will see that the redder the parts of the brain are, the more activity there is in that area so scientists can see which behaviours are initiated by which part of the brain.

Then MRI scans are similar but unlike PET scans they show the structure of the brain (in 3D also) and a dye is injected into the patient so that the whole brain structure can be visible on the screen.

You can see tumours with both MRI and PET scans but MRI scans have disadvantages purely because you get put in that long tube and it lasts a long time producing a really loud noise which sucks. So people can feel claustrophobic! x
0
reply
Lilyghz
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#13
Report 6 years ago
#13
(Original post by andy96)
okay so: neurotransmitters are chemical messengers which go through neurons and their synapses (the gap between neurons). Hormones on the other hand are also chemical messengers but they go through blood instead that's the only difference.

PET scans and MRI scans are both non-invasive (require no surgery)

PET scans have an injected radioactive tracer where glucose produces positrons (don't have to know what they are) and then they travel to the most active parts of the brain and on the screen you will see that the redder the parts of the brain are, the more activity there is in that area so scientists can see which behaviours are initiated by which part of the brain.

Then MRI scans are similar but unlike PET scans they show the structure of the brain (in 3D also) and a dye is injected into the patient so that the whole brain structure can be visible on the screen.

You can see tumours with both MRI and PET scans but MRI scans have disadvantages purely because you get put in that long tube and it lasts a long time producing a really loud noise which sucks. So people can feel claustrophobic! x
Thanks for keeping your answers short and simple they really helped! Is there anything I can help with?

Ps I read something funny so I thought I'd share with this forum because of how appropriate it is

AM I READY FOR MY PSYCHOLOGY EXAM?
I'm a-freud not.
0
reply
andy96
Badges: 5
Rep:
?
#14
Report 6 years ago
#14
(Original post by Lilyghz)
Thanks for keeping your answers short and simple they really helped! Is there anything I can help with?

Ps I read something funny so I thought I'd share with this forum because of how appropriate it is

AM I READY FOR MY PSYCHOLOGY EXAM?
I'm a-freud not.
hahaahaa oh god. lowered my stress levels a bit
do you know studd about bandura ross and ross? x
0
reply
andy96
Badges: 5
Rep:
?
#15
Report 6 years ago
#15
(Original post by andy96)
hahaahaa oh god. lowered my stress levels a bit
do you know studd about bandura ross and ross? x
the study*
0
reply
Lilyghz
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#16
Report 6 years ago
#16
(Original post by andy96)
the study*
Yes but is it alright if I pm you about it after the paper tomorrow? I'm going crazy about tomorrow :s x
0
reply
andy96
Badges: 5
Rep:
?
#17
Report 6 years ago
#17
(Original post by Lilyghz)
Yes but is it alright if I pm you about it after the paper tomorrow? I'm going crazy about tomorrow :s x
yeah sure and same my belly is doing backflips. :/
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Should there be a new university admissions system that ditches predicted grades?

No, I think predicted grades should still be used to make offers (700)
33.9%
Yes, I like the idea of applying to uni after I received my grades (PQA) (881)
42.66%
Yes, I like the idea of receiving offers only after I receive my grades (PQO) (392)
18.98%
I think there is a better option than the ones suggested (let us know in the thread!) (92)
4.46%

Watched Threads

View All