UKIP MEP's home is attacked

New evidence published on the guardian, BBC and dailymail shows they are supporters of the Labour Party who disagree with UKIPs policies.

The fact is they are liberal fascists who will attack anyone who is against their ideology. Seriously labour know nothing of democracy. They won't publicly debate UKIP, will not support a referendum, repeatedly attack members of other parties, start discriminative campaigns on people by promoting violence and attacks.

Tie in the expenses scandal, the racist attacks, the sex abuse crimes, the violent attacks and the many illegal fraud activities, most sources estimate 1.3% of labour so do your research you far left loon. You seem to have the IQ range of a crumpet and the Charisma of a rock

These left loons are the most violent of them all. They do not support democracy and believe that only their ideology is right. Seriously how anyone can support liberal facists like labour I do not know

How can this one person reflect the views/opinions/attitudes of an entire political wing?

May you provide me with this new evidence?

'Most sources'

Have you ever heard that quote that the intelligent are full of doubt while the stupid are cocksure? You definitely fall into the latter category.

I have heard that quote and recently modern philosophers have disregarded it's relevance and logic. So I'm not too bothered about it or how it applies to me.

Of course you're not bothered.

Ill be honest I am bothered

I know, that's why the quote is so apt.

No it wasn't.

Yes it certainly was.

Do your history homework and hand it in to me monday morning.

Posted from TSR Mobile

left wing and right wing nationalism are completely different

Yes it certainly was.

Do your history homework and hand it in to me monday morning.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Rubbish. You cannot tar the whole by the actions of a few.

Both the left and right have nationalist strands. To not acknowledge that is competently ignorant.

Yes i agree! Whoever thinks otherwise should be ashamed, because that was not what I was arguing.

Read carefully: Modern day "right wing" nationalism has roots in traditional left wing ideaological nationalism.
Posted from TSR Mobile

Making the whole left vs right paradigm moronic in this instance.

Read carefully: Modern day "right wing" nationalism has roots in traditional left wing ideaological nationalism. Nationalism came after people started to question their monarchies, and states/ nations began to form. What is so factually incorrect here?
Posted from TSR Mobile

So nationalism never existed in Britain as it retained a monarchy?

I woudn't say there is anything wrong with what you said. But those nationalistic tendencies existed along side with capitalism as well as fascism. It also depends on someone's definition of left wing. When I think of left wing I tend to think of the libertarian and anarchist part of the 2-D spectrum. These groups couldn't get any further away from nationalism. Then you have Trotskyism which is totalitarian and internationalist.

The likes of Lenin, Trotsky and Hitler road the waves of popular revolt to reign in power for themselves or the state they would introduce. They are counter revolutionary in my view. Lenin was right wing in some respects but wasn't nationalistic in his supposed goals. Hitler was for obvious master race reasons etc.

It's all to complicated to just say "the left/right invented nationalism"

The identity of a country and its state whether republican or a monarchy was vital in the running of colonial empires which are definitely not left wing.

America was/is full of nationalism and has been and is on the whole right wing.

So nationalism never existed in Britain as it retained a monarchy?

I woudn't say there is anything wrong with what you said. But those nationalistic tendencies existed along side with capitalism as well as fascism. It also depends on someone's definition of left wing. When I think of left wing I tend to think of the libertarian and anarchist part of the 2-D spectrum. These groups couldn't get any further away from nationalism. Then you have Trotskyism which is totalitarian and internationalist.

The likes of Lenin, Trotsky and Hitler road the waves of popular revolt to reign in power for themselves or the state they would introduce. They are counter revolutionary in my view. Lenin was right wing in some respects but wasn't nationalistic in his supposed goals. Hitler was for obvious master race reasons etc.

It's all to complicated to just say "the left/right invented nationalism"

The identity of a country and its state whether republican or a monarchy was vital in the running of colonial empires which are definitely not left wing.

America was/is full of nationalism and has been and is on the whole right wing.