# S3 - June 2014 Exam Prep Question

#1
Hi everyone; I just wanted to ask a question regarding S3 in preparation for the exam on Thursday and start a thread about it to talk after too!
It's quite a specific question about the replacement paper for 2013 June S3 last year. If you haven't done it, I think its a good one to do for Thursday, quite challenging!
The link is here to the paper:
And to the mark scheme:

On question 4 when we are asked to test the hypothesis about proportion of hair colors, personally I calculated the (observed-expected)^2/expected test statistic for all 4 rows, and had a degree of freedom of 15. In the mark scheme they just did the totals, and although we came out with the same result, I feel their method of only using totals disregarded a lot of data? Any advice about the best method, and I'm really interested to know if you think I would get the marks for doing it my way.

Thanks for any advice, and good luck for the exam!!
0
8 years ago
#2
0
#3
Yeah, so there was two papers. Some sat the replacement, and some the other normal paper. I think it is to do with the original paper being leaked. It happened with all models
0
8 years ago
#4
(Original post by Dorrez2k12)
Hi everyone; I just wanted to ask a question regarding S3 in preparation for the exam on Thursday and start a thread about it to talk after too!
It's quite a specific question about the replacement paper for 2013 June S3 last year. If you haven't done it, I think its a good one to do for Thursday, quite challenging!
The link is here to the paper:
And to the mark scheme:

On question 4 when we are asked to test the hypothesis about proportion of hair colors, personally I calculated the (observed-expected)^2/expected test statistic for all 4 rows, and had a degree of freedom of 15. In the mark scheme they just did the totals, and although we came out with the same result, I feel their method of only using totals disregarded a lot of data? Any advice about the best method, and I'm really interested to know if you think I would get the marks for doing it my way.

Thanks for any advice, and good luck for the exam!!
I did it the same way that is written in the mark scheme, I don't really see how you think it disregarded a lot of data, since every value is used in the calculation. As far as I can tell no data has being disregarded. But obviously the method you chose to use worked for you so my advice would be to continue doing what you're comfortable with in the exam, there's more than one route of getting to the answer. For the same paper, I don't really understand question 6a), any chance you could try and explain it to me?
0
#5
Thanks for the response!
0
8 years ago
#6
(Original post by Dorrez2k12)
On question 4 when we are asked to test the hypothesis about proportion of hair colors, personally I calculated the (observed-expected)^2/expected test statistic for all 4 rows, and had a degree of freedom of 15. In the mark scheme they just did the totals, and although we came out with the same result, I feel their method of only using totals disregarded a lot of data? Any advice about the best method, and I'm really interested to know if you think I would get the marks for doing it my way.

Thanks for any advice, and good luck for the exam!!
Just did this paper, you're right it was quite challenging.

The question states for you to only use Table 1 - so you essentially ignore all the stuff about eye colours and focus on the hair colours. From this you get your observed values as 105, 282, 48 and 165 respectively. Using the ratios they give, you can calculate your Expected values (100,300,50,150) and then use the normal method. There are only 3 degrees of freedom (4 parameters and 1 constraint)

It was definitely a question that required you to thing outside the box - you just need to ignore all irrelevant information (eye colours) and focus on the distribution they're asking you to test.

I doubt that tomorrow's paper will be as difficult as this, however.
0
8 years ago
#7
on june 2013 replacement paper, on question 4, can anyone explain to me why the null and alternative hypotheses were written like that? Its because every other past paper ask you about association.
Thanks
0
8 years ago
#8
(Original post by Dorrez2k12)
Thanks for the response!
0
8 years ago
#9
How did everyone find it?
0
#10
0
8 years ago
#11
We've got to wait 24 hours, so all im saying is that I was quite pleased. A few dodgy definition questions and weird mean and variance questions but overall, happy. Quite similar to most past papers.
0
8 years ago
#12
(Original post by Vilhelmschofield)
We've got to wait 24 hours, so all im saying is that I was quite pleased. A few dodgy definition questions and weird mean and variance questions but overall, happy. Quite similar to most past papers.
Nope, you're welcome to discuss it straight away, TSR introduced new rules the other day meaning that we can discuss the exam as soon as it has finished, provided we don't post a full unofficial mark scheme until 24 hours have passed.

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show....php?t=2686937
0
8 years ago
#13
(Original post by Dorrez2k12)
Yes, I found it quite a good paper on the whole, that defining statistics question was a bit annoying though, I put yes, no, no respectively for the three, did anyone else get that?
0
#14
Yeah I thought it went quite well too. The only thing I think I did wrong was forgot to square the 2 on the bottom of the statistic fraction when calculating the variance :-((( besides that pretty standard
I wondered why there was 7 mark for just an S2 statistic question

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
8 years ago
#15
Will anyone be doing an unofficial markscheme?
0
#16
If not, I'm sure we could club together and write one
0
8 years ago
#17
(Original post by Dorrez2k12)
If not, I'm sure we could club together and write one
Does anyone have a copy of the paper?
0
8 years ago
#18
what did u guys do for the last question?
what were your hypothesis' for peters SRCC??
0
8 years ago
#19
(Original post by DH96)
what did u guys do for the last question?
what were your hypothesis' for peters SRCC??
Ho: p=0
H1: p>0 (Peter's order agrees with the actual order)
0
8 years ago
#20
What did everyone get for 7b the one with the mean being less than 1kg
0
X

new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### Were exams easier or harder than you expected?

Easier (21)
27.63%
As I expected (23)
30.26%
Harder (28)
36.84%
Something else (tell us in the thread) (4)
5.26%