I went to a state school where just like every other state school in the country the annual spending on a pupil was £2000 a year, my brother went to a private school where annual spending was £30,000 a year and a friend went to seven oaks where fees are extremely high. Now which school do you think could afford better quality equipment? Which school could afford to hire more experienced and better qualified teachers who require higher salaries than trainees? and which school do you think gave the best opportunity for pupils to pass their exams? In sevenoaks you are rewarded for academic excellence at my brother's school you might get a treat, at my school the teachers said little and you got verbal and physical abuse in the playground. My friend and I were both in the middle sets in our schools he was told to aim for an A I was told to "aim for an E a lot of people say that only A to C grades count but an E is also a pass, so don't be upset if you get an E". He got A's and B's and his parents were satisfied, I got 8C's and two D's and recieved a letter of congratualations for achieving more than 5 A*-C passes. My mum has taught in numerous state schools as a supply teacher and says that is not a particularly shocking situation, all the schools she's taught in are in more or less the same situation. If I have kids I definatly want to send them to a private school, rather than a school like mine where getting into oxbridge gets you a half page article devoted solely to you on the front page of the termly news letter.