The argument homosexuals make regarding being allowed to do what they do is that there are two mature people consenting which doesn't harm anybody.
So how about if a Mother and Son / Dad and Daughter (being of age) were to engage in sexual activity (incest) or a romantic relationship?
Shouldn't that be deemed acceptable as to the standards of many 'homosexual rights' advocates.
Disclaimer: This is not a hate thread towards homosexuals but much rather a question to help clarify my understanding on why those who advocate homosexuality don't advocate other 'similar' (in the loosest sense) affections which go against modern day dominant ideologies.
Further Disclaimer: I personally don't condone any of the above.
One leads to medical issues and harm.
The other leads to nothing but outrage from people who don't like it.
Incest all the way *****es
I did a dissertation on this.
parent/child relationships all but certainly going to be due to grooming or manipulation by the parent, there is simply too much imbalance in that relationship. sibling relationships are more comparable, and to be honest beyond a gut reaction I can't think of anything wrong with it beyond the increased risk of birth defects. so I guess I can't really condemn it.
Because any Parent/Child adult relationship that is likely to have began as Child abuse.
Therefore on that basis it should be illegal.
However, I don't really have a problem with Cousins or whatever getting it on. The entire problem with that are the significant medical issues that could arise and the tax payer would have to foot the bill.
Incest isn't allowed? It should be.... Not that I'll ever do such a thing... I just want us to be as sexually liberated as possible and get rid of the pre-historic and deep-rooted patriarchy