The Student Room Group

Recommended Physics Reading

Ok so time and again I've seen the question of what books one should read to develop an interest in physics and to bridge the gap between A-level and degree. I was thinking maybe we should create a list of interesting and informative books that are useful and advisable to read. Obviously only post those that you would recommend, not every book you have ever read :p:. If you could post title, author and a small description that would be grand :biggrin:

For a more complete and up to date list of recommendations based on this thread and it's sister thread then see the associated article in the TSR Wiki

Astrophysics & Cosmology

A Brief History of Time - Stephen Hawking
Not as good as its mythological status suggests but definitely worth a read to give a broad overview of cosmology. A little out of date now, and a little mind blowing in places but it certainly opens your eyes to the principles of cosmology. Nothing really in the way of scary mathematics.

Universe in a Nutshell - Stephen Hawking
The sequel to the above, written in 2001 it brings the reader up to date, focussing mainly on the theory of branes and M-theory, which leads on from string theory. A lot more pretty pictures in this one, but again quite involved conceptually, and somewhat biased towards set theories.

The Elegant Universe - Brian Greene
Another of these mythical "must read" books which has become extremely popular of late. For all its popularity make no mistake that it is not an easy read. Its pitched at quite a high level but does give just about everything on string theory you could possibly want to know. It's also very biased towards string theory. Read it if you like, but in my opinion there are far better books out there. Save yourself the trouble and watch the TV series.

Blackholes and Timewarps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy - Kip Thorne
A really excellent book that I would really recommend. It's quite difficult to obtain, and rather epic in proportions but it covers all areas of astronomy, right through from relativity to black holes to the search for gravity waves. I particularly like the way it focusses on the scientific method, and how physics at that level operates in research groups.

The First Three Minutes - Steven Weinberg
This is a book that is always highly recommended. It's very well explained to the lay person (but with gloassarys and mathematical stuff at the end for those who want it) and focusses more on a step by step occurance of what happened in the first 3 minutes after the big bang, in a level of detail not covered elsewhere. It does have one drawback, and that is it is seriously starting to show its age. It shows just how far astronomy has come in the last 25 years as many areas known today are not mentioned, and often he guards his back against the then latest (and now accepted theories) by describing others. Inflation is not mentioned at all. If you bear this in mind though, its worth a read just for being well-written and slightly different in topic.

Just Six Numbers - Martin Rees
Written by the Astronomer Royal this book takes a slightly different tact, focussing on 6 dimensionless fundamental constants of nature and looking at how these affect the way the universe is today. It basically tells the story of the development of the universe through these 6 numbers. It tries to be different, but is basically the same story from a different angle. Worthy of a read though.

In Search of the Big Bang - John Gribbin
Very much a pop science book, and like most John Gribbin books probably not entirely accurate, but it is an enthralling read about the history of the universe and how the theories we believe today came about. It includes a bit on string theory, and in particular a discussion of the forces as existing in other dimensions... which in my experience is quite rare for a book.

Quantum

In Search of Schrodinger's Cat - John Gribbin
Again, not completely accurate and a little out of date now, but a compelling read for all that. It was this book which awoke my enthusiasm for quantum, which has remained ever since. It's all just so bizarre. The book is basically a history of quantum and how it came about, with some good analogies and a final discussion on how it is used in every day life.

Schrodinger's Kittens - John Gribbin
The sequel to the above, discussing the developments of quantum since the late 80s when the above was written. It mainly covers entanglement, doing quite a reasonable job of explaining it I must say. I think there is a small section on quantum computing also. Not as good as the above book but readable and interesting nonetheless for those with an interest in quantum.

QED - Richard Feynman
Not for the faint hearted. I have to confess I've never read this but you can never go wrong with Feynman. From what i know though, it is pitched at quite a high level, so I would advise leaving it til at least A2, and having read some more basic quantum books first.

Relativity
Relativity is quite hard to read on as the subject is necessarily complex and mathematical. There are not in my experience that many books out there pitched at a level readable by A-level students. The best you can do is to read the astro books above which do talk and discuss relativity at reasonable length. Books on time travel are another possibility

Special Relativity - A. P. French.
this is really a degree level text book, fairly widely used from what I can gather, but it is just about readable and understandable as a reading book and the maths is kept to a relative minimum. I wouldn't recommend it to those not totally confident with maths and physics as it is quite an advanced read.

Electromagnetism
Finding books on electromagnetism of a pop science nature is nigh on impossible. Electromagnetism necessarily requires high level of mathematical skill and understanding, on topics not covered at A-level (such as vector calculus and multiple integrals to name but two). If anyone can find any I'll include it, but in short I would avoid EM like the plague as it is enough to put anyone off physics for life if you aren't careful. You'll meet it soon enough at Uni if you go on that far

Historical

Great Physicists - William H. Cropper
I love this book. I take it to uni with me every term as its great to just dip into. It covers nearly every possible area of physics in surprising detail. It even gives explanations of some advanced mathematical topics such as vector calculus. It's set out as a biography of around 30 key physicists, arranged by area of physics, discussing in depth the lives of these greats and the detail behind what they discovered. I highly recommend this one.

General

Feynman Lectures In Physics (Vol I-III) - Richard Feynman
These are the classic lecture series books produced by Feynman which every student likes to claim to have read. I would not advise purchasing them (they are expensive) or indeed reading them cover to cover, but they do offer a different perspective of things and Feynman is unparallelled in his ability to explain. Make no mistake, these are degree level books, although they would not be useful as a core text book in any degree course you do. If you want lighter reading I suggest the extracts below.

Six Easy Pieces/ Six Not So Easy Pieces - Richard Feynman
These are the best bits from the above lectures in physics. The first is clealy simpler to read than the not so easy ones, as should be obvious from the title. I would definitely advise reading 6 easy pieces, just for the discussions of quantum. Feynman sees things differently too everyone else and his analogies are excellent.

The Meaning of it All - Richard Feynman
I've never actually read this one, I'mnot even sure what it's about. However, it was recommended to me by people in the know about these things before I applied to uni, and with Feynman you really can't go wrong. The only reason I haven't read it is that for thin book (as with all Feynman books) it isn't cheap.

A-level Standard Texts

Can't think of any at present

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
I've decided to make a further appendage to the recommended reading list to advise and suggest core text books for an undergraduate physics course. This is always a tricky area, as a core text book is often specific to a particular course (this is the reason I originally avoided the area). I therefore advise that these recommendations are taken with caution but may be used as a starting point or an alternative if you want a different viewpoint to your recommended core textbook. Because I have experience of only one course there is likely to be some bias towards my own course here, so I highly encourage you to make your own suggestions for addition.


Work in Progress


Mathematics

Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences - Mary L. Boas
I really like this book. I think it's the greatest reference mathematics book you could possibly have. Maybe it's not great for learning from alone, as it's very mathematical and lacking in clear easy to understand explanation. However, if there’s something bugging you or you cant quite remember what some formula/method is this is the book. It’ll be useful for your entire course and if I recommended buying just one book it would be this one.

All you wanted to know about mathematics but were afraid to ask - Louis Lyons
I liked this book in first year. It's a bit of a marmite book, you either like it or you don't. It's very wordy, more like a novel and without that many formulae, so if reading through lines of formula and derivation isn't your style then this could be the book for you. As far as the level goes it's really only useful as a first year text I think, maybe 2nd at a push.

Relativity

Special Relativity - French
A good relativity book, quite wordy, with quite a lot of explanation. It does take a bit of getting into but its actually quite readable as a bedtime story if you are so inclined. It lacks a discussion on the more advanced topics of special rel, for example 4-vectors and relativistic optics. I didn't think the discussion of mass-energy and conservation laws was that amazing either, but maybe that was just me.

Spacetime Physics - John Wheeler
If you're going to read a book, it's often best to choose one written by top physicists, and Wheeler is one of those. This is, I would say, the alternative guide to SR. It’s quite hardcore mathematically, with some quite abstract ideas. It’s also laid out rather oddly, but it is one of those books that seems to mention everything and it has lots of pictures and diagrams. I found it good for the paradoxes and thought experiments but i’d say this is more an acquired taste read.

Introduction to Special Relativity - Rindler


Electromagnetism

Electricity and Magnetism - Duffin
A good solid EM book for first year. It has all the explanation you need and is probably more suited to a first year course. It does have a huge amount of content but does have the disturbing habit of sending you to sleep while reading it. In other words it's boring... very boring, as indeed most EM books seem to be. No book has ever had the ability to put me to sleep quite like good ol' Duffin. To be fair though I’d rate it quite highly, especially for 1st year.

Electricity and Magnetism - Bleaney
This is Duffin + a bit more. I find it more readable/ interesting than Duffin and if I had to pick a favourite EM book this would be it. It goes off into solid state stuff later, but the first half is very good for EM. Its well written, well explained and I’ve very rarely found it lacking in anything. The main drawback is its a bit advanced maybe for 1st year, but definitely my favourite.

Classical Electrodynamics - Jackson
Jackson pretty much wrote the book on the subject I would say. Very Mathematical! Its seriously hardcore and unless you are of the maths genius variety, very difficult to learn from. It's great as a dip in book if there’s that problem you can’t find anywhere else. Not for the faint hearted though and certainly not advisable for 1st year. A good companion to a Bleaney or whatever though as a 2nd year text.

Optics

Optics - Hecht
This is pretty much your optics bible, and I think its generally accepted as the optics book. It's just about the only comprehensive book there is. It has it all really, but is quite mathematical and maybe starts at a highish level – i.e. it doesn’t have much on geometric optics and ray diagrams etc. I'm not a huge fan to be honest, it's organised quite poorly and I find it hard to find the relevant stuff in it, it's the only decentish book there is though. It's comprehensive and about the only optics book you will ever need. Also good for parts of EM.

Quantum Mechanics

Quantum Physics - Gasiorowicz
This is our standard QM text book (and the same for quite a few unis I believe). I quite like it, though it can be a bit mathsy and take a few big steps on occasions. It does cover pretty much everything and I find it a good book to have alongside the lecture course. It has a good treament of the different aspects of quantum mechanics - Schrodinger equation & Matrix mechanics and considerable use is made of Dirac notation. It covers quite a bit of atomic physics too, with a discussion of the helium atom and of the important concepts of perturbation theory (time dependent and independent) which are not included in all other texts. All in all a pretty good book and fairly well explained.

The Principles of Quantum Mechanics - Shankar
This is actually a graduate level textbook. Now before you run off, it actually starts off relatively straightforwardly. It’s a beast of a book physically and is the quantum mechanics textbook to a lot of people. It is probably the most precise book on quantum mechanics ever written, in terms of being careful with language. It makes no mistakes in its wording and explains things very well. It’s a good book that will obviously last you a long time. It does get quite hardcore later on but that’s a given. I’m actually considering buying this book, but at £50 have yet to pluck up the courage.

Thermodynamics

Equilibrium Thermodynamics - Adkins
Great thermo book, the 1 recommended for our course. It has it all that I've seen and you could probably read it and find it extremely useful. I however, don’t use it that much, I find it a little inaccessible and difficult to find things in.

Thermal Physics - Finn
The reason I’ve neglected Adkins is this book. Its pretty much based on Adkins it seems. It has most of the stuff you need but is not quite as detailed/thorough as Adkins. I’d say it has 95% though. It’s a very accessible book that’s very readable (I’ve read it cover to cover). It focuses more on the fundamental understanding (hence quite wordy) and I found it really helpful. I didn’t get thermo to begin with but this book really helped. Definitely my thermo book of choice, the only issue is its slight lack of content.
Reply 2
I found that 'The new quantum universe' - Hey and Walters was a very good book on quantum physics :smile:
Reply 3
thought i'd add a little to this cuz i only know
A- level Standard Texts
Pacific Physics (i guess thats only available in asia or something)
its not really good on the theory part but it has lots of practice questions

A-level Physics - Roger and Muncaster
another reference book my teacher reccomended..

Accessible Physics - Azzopardi and Stewart
The theory is explained in a nice easy understandable concise manner.. best theory explanation so far

Advanced Physics (that red book by the cambridge press i think.. )


ok and physics for you i think its gcse level physics but i truly adore that book for some reason!!
Advanced Physics (that red book by the cambridge press i think.. )


I think you mean the purple one by Oxford university press. A great reference book for a-level physics, even if it does go a little bit too far in some places.
Reply 5
I'll add a couple of my own ideas here:

Relativity - Albert Einstein
Makes sense to read about the topic from the man himself. The ideas themselves are fairly simple to understand, but the book is not written very concisely , so at times it can be difficult to get through the wordy parts to extract the relevant information, but if you've got the patience, it's a rewarding read.

Hyperspace - Michio Kaku
Not relevant to the A Level at all, but a very interesting insight into hyperspace theory, string theory, the contenders for the "Theory Of Everything" and some Cosmology.

:smile:
Reply 6
If you are feeling VERY adventurous. Then there is:

The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe - Roger Penrose

Be warned it is a very dense book, the first 500 or so pages cover the maths needed to understand the physics in the next 500 pages. It is well above 1st year uni level, and extends far into graduate level. But I think it is a good book to read even if you don't follow all the dense maths, it certainly gives you an idea of what you can expect to study if you are thinking of continuing on to a physics degree, or thinking about furthy study after your first degree.
Reply 7
jpowell
If you are feeling VERY adventurous. Then there is:

The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe - Roger Penrose

Be warned it is a very dense book, the first 500 or so pages cover the maths needed to understand the physics in the next 500 pages. It is well above 1st year uni level, and extends far into graduate level. But I think it is a good book to read even if you don't follow all the dense maths, it certainly gives you an idea of what you can expect to study if you are thinking of continuing on to a physics degree, or thinking about furthy study after your first degree.


loooooooooool. I got that book took about a month to read 5 chapters, lol on the 6th chapter and left....you can't really read much of it all in one go, very heavy reading.

and surely you're joking mr feynman brilliant book. It's not too scientific really...just about his life and adventures.
I read The universe in a nutshell and The elegant universe...think i need to re read them...didn't really go through them slowly....lottssaa pictures in the former and im reading parallel worlds at the moment by Michio Kaku, and just started reading The fabric of the cosmos by Brian Greene too.
Reply 8
.S.O.S.
loooooooooool. I got that book took about a month to read 5 chapters, lol on the 6th chapter and left....you can't really read much of it all in one go, very heavy reading.

and surely you're joking mr feynman brilliant book. It's not too scientific really...just about his life and adventures.
I read The universe in a nutshell and The elegant universe...think i need to re read them...didn't really go through them slowly....lottssaa pictures in the former and im reading parallel worlds at the moment by Michio Kaku, and just started reading The fabric of the cosmos by Brian Greene too.

Let us know how you get on with those last two :smile:

jpowell
If you are feeling VERY adventurous. Then there is:

The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe - Roger Penrose

Be warned it is a very dense book, the first 500 or so pages cover the maths needed to understand the physics in the next 500 pages. It is well above 1st year uni level, and extends far into graduate level. But I think it is a good book to read even if you don't follow all the dense maths, it certainly gives you an idea of what you can expect to study if you are thinking of continuing on to a physics degree, or thinking about furthy study after your first degree.


Yeah, I've seen that one about and many praise it up, what has held me back is the expense that buying a book of that size entails. I may try and see if a local library has it some time.
Reply 9
The paperback is £8.99 on amazon.
F1 fanatic
Let us know how you get on with those last two :smile:



Yeah, I've seen that one about and many praise it up, what has held me back is the expense that buying a book of that size entails. I may try and see if a local library has it some time.


ebay?
I don't know I never used that, my brother does tho.

In the parallel worlds book he discribed this universe, as in a box room and say your standing in this room, and you stick your hand through the wall (which you can do) it appears comming out of the opposite wall,(because theres nothing outside your box universe...i think). so you can imagine this as there are these boxes above you, besides, infront, below you, with another you inside them, and each of those box rooms would have similar boxes surrounding them etc goes off to infinity (and beyond). and all these 'you' s do the same thing. So when you stick your hand through the wall, the person(you) in the universe behind you sticks their hand through their wall too, and thats whose hand you see appearing through the opposite wall. He went on to say imagine the walls were transparent so you can see all these infinite number of 'you' s......I thought thats just freaky...he went on to talk about killing your other self will mean you killing yourself :eek:

soo sorry, I know I talk too much. Don't blame you if you don't read it.
Honestly i've stopped reading now...i just can't be bothered, :boring:
those books...parallel worlds and fabric of cosmos...are mostly about string theory...and its not elegant as most people say...to me its just tedious, theres super symetry and membranes and this and that...bleh. sorry i don't mean to offend anyone.
Reply 12
.S.O.S.
Honestly i've stopped reading now...i just can't be bothered, :boring:
those books...parallel worlds and fabric of cosmos...are mostly about string theory...and its not elegant as most people say...to me its just tedious, theres super symetry and membranes and this and that...bleh. sorry i don't mean to offend anyone.
I just thought I'd tell you that you're not alone. I've tried reading Elegant Universe a couple of times and each time I get about halfway through and then give up once it starts talking about how the homoerotic string theory is equivilent to the Type-IB blah pineapples here's another diagam of Calabi-Yau spaces boring rubbish for pages and pages.

There are other, more interesting, popular science books. When I was doing A-Level I found QED by Richard Feynman very interesting. One of my favourite books at the moment is It Must Be Beautiful, which is a collection of essays by different scientists about different equations in science. It's not limited to Physics, though.

Edited to add:
But up until the second half of the book I did enjoy The Elegant Universe. I was reading it at a time when I didn't know that much about special relativity or anything and I found Brian Greene's explanations useful.

The Road to Reality is pretty hard going. I bought it because it was cheap(-ish) on amazon and I can understand why it's so much cheaper than the RRP. The structure is quite odd. I think it's a bit too ambitious.
Reply 13
jpowell
The paperback is £8.99 on amazon.

Really? I think I've only seen the hardback, can't remember how much it was. I just remember thinking "ouch, I think not!" at £8.99 I may well consider it.

.S.O.S.
Honestly i've stopped reading now...i just can't be bothered,
those books...parallel worlds and fabric of cosmos...are mostly about string theory...and its not elegant as most people say...to me its just tedious, theres super symetry and membranes and this and that...bleh. sorry i don't mean to offend anyone.


I have to agree with you. That is a big part of the reason for creating this thread. So many people seem to think that they should read "the Elegant Universe" and "Brief History of Time" when in fact both are pretty hardcore reading books. There are many other books which are far easier, and indeed more interesting, as I hope the list above will illustrate. Personally I would avoid the elegant universe, I've never read it and don't have any intention of doing so.
Reply 14
What is wrong with the elegant universe? I think it's excellent. Physics shouldn't be easy :biggrin: :wink:
Reply 15
jpowell

Be warned it is a very dense book, the first 500 or so pages cover the maths needed to understand the physics in the next 500 pages.

I think I should point out to anybody who is drawn in by his preface is that to learn the Mathematics required for the Physics from his first 500 pages alone - he claims it to be accessible to someone who only understands up to fractions- would require a prodigious ability.
Reply 16
jpowell
What is wrong with the elegant universe? I think it's excellent. Physics shouldn't be easy :biggrin: :wink:

I was talking about the price rather than the content. :p: What can I say, I'm a cheapskate :redface:. I also disagree on the easyness of physics. A genius should make it look obsurdly simple, it's only when you come to try and do things yourself that you suddenly realise how hard it actually is!
I don't think its too hard...just too much.
Reply 18
The Fifth Essence - Lawence Krauss

A really good read; no maths whatsoever, but still challenging and interesting. Whilst primarily about Dark Matter, it covers a real breadth of subject matter; Gravitation, light/ether/Michelson and Morley, Big Bang and Nucleosythesis, Particle Physics, Relativity and Gravitational Lensing, Super-symmetry...everything really. A really refreshing view away from A-Level which always seemed to be modularised with little or no interrelation between different parts of Physics.
Reply 19
.S.O.S.
Honestly i've stopped reading now...i just can't be bothered, :boring:
those books...parallel worlds and fabric of cosmos...are mostly about string theory...and its not elegant as most people say...to me its just tedious, theres super symetry and membranes and this and that...bleh. sorry i don't mean to offend anyone.

I found Parallel Worlds very tedious and stopped reading at about page 90. I was trying to push myself through it but I just gave up. Having read about 10-15 other popular physics books it just seemed to be going over the same stuff in a not very original way. I can re-read other physics books though, so I don't see how I'd get bored on the first read if it was well written.
So many people seem to think that they should read "the Elegant Universe" and "Brief History of Time" when in fact both are pretty hardcore reading books.

Although I struggled the first time I tried to read A Brief History of Time (I think I was 11) and gave up part way through I think A Briefer History of Time is quite a simple book to understand (perhaps the comparative difficulty was distorted by reading it 4 years later and after having read the original the whole way through).