You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Another Cauchy-Goursat Question....? Watch

1. if i have the integral:

to prove that it equals zero, would i be correct in splitting it up into:

and then pointing out that the numerator is "entire", and the singularities dont lie within the connected domain (contour) and, THUS, by the Cauchy-Goursat Theorm the integral takes the value zero? (since each part does?)

(i cant exactly do any more than that - can i?)

I cant just say "the numerator is entire, the denominators singularities arent inside the circle therefore = 0!!

Thanks!
2. (Original post by Hasufel)
if i have the integral:

to prove that it equals zero, would i be correct in splitting it up into:

and then pointing out that the numerator is "entire", and the singularities dont lie within the connected domain (contour) and, THUS, by the Cauchy-Goursat Theorm the integral takes the value zero? (since each part does?)

(i cant exactly do any more than that - can i?)

I cant just say "the numerator is entire, the denominators singularities arent inside the circle therefore = 0!!

Thanks!
To be perfectly honest, I would be inclined to say precisely that "the numerator is entire and the zeros of the denominator lie outside the contour". I can't really see the purpose of such a question, but such is life!
3. (Original post by Hasufel)
if i have the integral:

to prove that it equals zero, would i be correct in splitting it up into:

and then pointing out that the numerator is "entire", and the singularities dont lie within the connected domain (contour) and, THUS, by the Cauchy-Goursat Theorm the integral takes the value zero? (since each part does?)

(i cant exactly do any more than that - can i?)

I cant just say "the numerator is entire, the denominators singularities aren`t inside the circle therefore = 0!!

Thanks!
Just tell whoever asked it that it is a stupid question and that they should come up with examples that illustrate purpose rather than function.

Posted from TSR Mobile
4. Just to point out, if you're doing partial fractions and you start seeing coefficients like 204, 340 - chances are that isn't the intended method. However, as the other two pointed out, this is practically a trivial problem if you're allowed to use Cauchy's Thorem, and there isn't any need to split it up to use CT. To be honest, this is the kind of level of difficulty you'd expect at A-Level if CT was covered. As with your previous questions, really you just need to show that the function is holomorphic inside, and on, the contour by showing that any singularity lies outside (which is straightforward here since the singularities clearly all have modulus >1) and the function is holomorphic everywhere else (which you rarely need to explicitely show in a complex analysis course - it's clear with this given that sin(z) and the denominator are holomorphic, so the product of the two will be whereever the denominator is non-zero).
5. Thanks for the input, guys! - to be honest, i thought it might just be a straitforward: "numerstor..blah, denominator..blah" => each =0

- Just like to be thorough, though!

cheers! +rep

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: July 7, 2014
Today on TSR

### Medicine, fastest and slowest offer senders

Have you got yours?

### You can apply to Hogwarts?!

Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• ## See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• ## See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.