Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Privatisation of RM a £1bn rip off for the taxpayer Watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    http://rt.com/uk/172032-royal-mail-shares-taxpayers/
    http://www.bbc.com/news/business-28250963

    Oh, privatisation is about cost-cutting and efficiency? I thought it was about selling everything off to your mates.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    I bought it.

    Who am I mates of?
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    This isn't suprising, despite the mantra, privatisation almost always leads to decreased effeciency, and a loss for the tax-payer.

    It's like Thatcher all over again.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Farm_Ecology)
    This isn't suprising, despite the mantra, privatisation almost always leads to decreased effeciency, and a loss for the tax-payer.

    It's like Thatcher all over again.
    How was it a loss?
    We made money.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    If I was asked to value a government asset for privatisation, I would undervalue it and buy up some of the shares myself or advise those I know to buy them. Of course people who work in finance would never do a dishonest thing like that.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    An argument those in favour of privatisation will sprout is that is increases competition. In reality, all I have seen is TNT N.V. replace the Royal Mail in my area. No one in my area is able to form their own postal service and selling off a public asset under the pretence of competition is a guise to make rich people even richer; it is of no benefit to the people of this country.
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Moosferatu)
    http://rt.com/uk/172032-royal-mail-shares-taxpayers/
    http://www.bbc.com/news/business-28250963

    Oh, privatisation is about cost-cutting and efficiency? I thought it was about selling everything off to your mates.
    Actually I do believe privatization will be great for the RM, especially if they can automate. It will also be great for us since we still own 30%.

    I do agree that it was underpriced at a P/E ratio of 5 in a bull market. That said if it was overpriced all the relatively normal investors would be whining.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Moosferatu)
    http://rt.com/uk/172032-royal-mail-shares-taxpayers/
    http://www.bbc.com/news/business-28250963

    Oh, privatisation is about cost-cutting and efficiency? I thought it was about selling everything off to your mates.
    It seems that you are confused about the arguments for privatization, cost-cutting/efficiency refers to the running of the business.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Marcum)
    An argument those in favour of privatisation will sprout is that is increases competition. In reality, all I have seen is TNT N.V. replace the Royal Mail in my area. No one in my area is able to form their own postal service and selling off a public asset under the pretence of competition is a guise to make rich people even richer; it is of no benefit to the people of this country.
    No the main argument was that it would allow royal mail to acrew a larger investment as the government was unable to fund investment in Royal mail, hence it was floated to raise capital from the financial markets.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pussy Galore)
    No the main argument was that it would allow royal mail to acrew a larger investment as the government was unable to fund investment in Royal mail, hence it was floated to raise capital from the financial markets.
    I didn't assert what I believe to be the main reason, I was making a somewhat biased observation.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pussy Galore)
    No the main argument was that it would allow royal mail to acrew a larger investment as the government was unable to fund investment in Royal mail, hence it was floated to raise capital from the financial markets.
    Since the money raised didn't go back into the business (and was never due to) I don't see how that was an arguement...
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: July 15, 2014
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Did TEF Bronze Award affect your UCAS choices?
    Useful resources

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.