You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Find the set of values of x for which C1 Watch

1. The title says it all. This is an inequality. I came up with x is smaller than -2 and bigger than 2.5 and 3 however the answer is x>3. But this excludes the -2 and the 2.5 Please help.
and
2. Ahhh I see, I just needed to see them as graphs. x<2.5 I should've seen as a graph. Graphs are so helpful. I got the right answer now.
Btw, does anybody know whether you can, and if so, how to delete threads you've posted?
3. (Original post by MathMeister)
The title says it all. This is an inequality. I came up with x is smaller than -2 and bigger than 2.5 and 3 however the answer is x>3. But this excludes the -2 and the 2.5 Please help.
and
From your second equation you have
2x>5 means that you cannot have any values less than 2.5

Then from the first equation you have
x cannot be between -2 and 3
So this now tells you x>3
4. (Original post by MathMeister)
how to delete threads you've posted?
there is no need to delete - others may learn from your initial confusion
5. (Original post by MathMeister)
...
Remember that both inequalities have to be satisfied.

These are both satisfied by

Spoiler:
Show
(Original post by TenOfThem)
...
If I wanted to use mathematical notation to show the set of values of for which both inequalities are satisfied, would this be ok?

6. I see the importance like many have said of learning/revising hard from the modular books instead of smashing exam papers as a excuse for learning. However, I have recently became even more confused, exactly because they have to satisfy each inequality. And just as I write this I figure it out. Gosh- the textbook is so vital in learning.
7. (Original post by MathMeister)
The title says it all. This is an inequality. I came up with x is smaller than -2 and bigger than 2.5 and 3 however the answer is x>3. But this excludes the -2 and the 2.5 Please help.
and
Here, I have assumed that both inequalities need to be satisfied to give a set of values for , is that right?

For the quadratic, just factorise as normal - gives crossing points as or . However, since the inequality says "greater than 0", you want all solutions that are greater than 0. It's easiest to graph a sketch. You'll realise that the bit that is below zero is the region: . Hence the rest of it is the first solution, i.e. and .

This then gets combined with the other inequality, which works out to be . However, when combined, we know that x must be larger than 3. Hence, x can no longer be less than -2, or between 2.5 and 3. This leads to the correct solution, .
8. (Original post by TenOfThem)
there is no need to delete - others may learn from your initial confusion
That's correct - other people may find this helpful.

Subscribers can delete their own threads, or alternatively, go to Ask A Moderator and one of the mods can delete it for you.
10. (Original post by MathMeister)

Hi,

I'll give it a crack now. It is asking for the set of values for k, that let In other words, what values of k can be put into the equation, that let the discriminant be more than zero?

Here, we need to set up an inequality; that is: .

By plugging in the values for a, b and c, and simplifying, we get:

Solving gives the roots of the quadratic as or .

Then, graph the curve. Remember, since the discriminant must be greater than zero for the equation to have real roots, the quadratic involving k must be greater than zero.

Hence, you need the part of the curve that is greater than zero, which gives the answer:

and

I've also attached my methodology to this problem.
Hope I've helped
Attached Images

11. (Original post by spotify95)
Hi
I am very surprised to see a full solution from someone who officially represents TSR
12. (Original post by TenOfThem)
I am very surprised to see a full solution from someone who officially represents TSR
Whoopsie, am I not allowed to put a full solution? I'll edit if necessary.

The reason why I posted it was to explain how I got to that answer. It was more of a confirmation, as the FM that asked me the question did get somewhere along the lines of the correct answer (mentioned a quadratic in k). The only thing he got wrong was the inequality sign; he answered -2 < k < 6 when the answer is k < -2 and k > 6.

Graphing this type of question always helps - but don't worry I'll edit if necessary.
13. What I don't understand is why it isn't greater or equal instead of just being greater-Since when b squared = 4ac, there are roots, two of them, which happen to be equal and ''recurring''- as well as b squared being larger than 4ac having real roots. So why isn't b^2 greater or equal to 4ac in the calculation, or is it something to do with the graph?
Also, in the answer book in the modular book and cd, the answer is 2<k<6. ???? Misprint/mistake? This is rather interesting. GeoGebra also agrees with you. I think its a misprint. possibly
Also, what's with the cross in your zero?
14. (Original post by MathMeister)
What I don't understand is why it isn't greater or equal instead of just being greater-Since when b squared = 4ac, there are roots, two of them, which happen to be equal and ''recurring''- as well as b squared being larger than 4ac having real roots. So why isn't b^2 greater or equal to 4ac in the calculation, or is it something to do with the graph?
Also, in the answer book in the modular book and cd, the answer is 2<k<6. ???? Misprint/mistake? This is rather interesting. GeoGebra also agrees with you. I think its a misprint. possibly
Also, what's with the cross in your zero?
Hey there

I assumed you wanted real roots, and it is greater than when there are real roots.
You are correct in that it can be equal to zero; however then they are called "equal roots", as the root is the same (it is a touching point rather than a crossing point on the curve)

It probably is a misprint - as 2<k<6 would be right for if it was less than zero. However, less than zero there are no real roots, so that is not possible. I would say a mis print.

The cross in my zero? You mean the line? Probably how I write them, I can make it clearer for you from now on
15. So, to conclude this question, a real root is when there are 2 x-intercepts. A real root cannot be an equal root (vice versa) as an equal root does not cross the x-axis. Am I correct in thinking this?
Also, (sorry) another question I have came up with, is why the graphical representation of the expression tells you what values of k for which the equation has real roots. I see the inequality, but fail to see how this relates to k. I don't see.... ahhh wait... I figured it out. This has been the best maths problem so far. Wopee! I completely and utterly understand it all now. I understand the question and answer entirely. Please may somebody answer the underlined question however, still.
Thank you!
16. (Original post by MathMeister)
So, to conclude this question, a real root is when there are 2 x-intercepts. A real root cannot be an equal root (vice versa) as an equal root does not cross the x-axis. Am I correct in thinking this?
Also, (sorry) another question I have came up with, is why the graphical representation of the expression tells you what values of k for which the equation has real roots. I see the inequality, but fail to see how this relates to k. I don't see.... ahhh wait... I figured it out. This has been the best maths problem so far. Wopee! I completely and utterly understand it all now. I understand the question and answer entirely. Please may somebody answer the underlined question however, still.
Thank you!
No, that is completely wrong.

A real root is just that, it doesn't matter if it's repeated or two distinct roots.

Posted from TSR Mobile
17. (Original post by MathMeister)
So, to conclude this question, a real root is when there are 2 x-intercepts. A real root cannot be an equal root (vice versa) as an equal root does not cross the x-axis. Am I correct in thinking this?
no, this thinking is not correct

a real root is Real rather than Complex

• no Real roots
• a repeated real root
• 2 real roots
18. (Original post by MathMeister)
There are many contradictions. Maybe TenOfThem may hopefully remove all confusion. So many different opinions...
If you are right then spotify95 was wrong in not putting greater than or equal.
Let ∆ represent the discriminant:

Real roots - ∆ => 0
Distinct real roots - ∆ >0
Repeated real roots - ∆=0
Complex roots - ∆ <0
19. Prsom* ... to all-In this case then surely spotify95 was wrong in not putting greater than or equal sign in his working. If that's the case then maybe he did not know this. Somebody help?
Also, I will try to understand the delta thing arithmatic posted (ty)
20. (Original post by MathMeister)
Prsom* ... to all-In this case then surely spotify95 was wrong in not putting greater than or equal sign in his working. If that's the case then maybe he did not know this. Somebody help?
Also, I will try to understand the delta thing arithmatic posted (ty)
hmmmmm

The words Real Roots implies more than 1 real root

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: July 31, 2014
Today on TSR

### Degrees to get rich!

... and the ones that won't

### Cambridge interviews pour in...

Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• ## See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• ## See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.