Go to first unread
Back
to top
Two hour execution in USA
Watch
Announcements
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-28460647
I mean seriously?
How can it take 2 hours to execute someone? A few minutes high dose of helium would do it or a massive dose of opiates.
I hear the family arguing that they went through hell so who cares.
I would say if society chooses to use that as a bar and partake in barbaric and torturous practises like this, it is questionable if society is any better.
I mean seriously?
How can it take 2 hours to execute someone? A few minutes high dose of helium would do it or a massive dose of opiates.
I hear the family arguing that they went through hell so who cares.
I would say if society chooses to use that as a bar and partake in barbaric and torturous practises like this, it is questionable if society is any better.
1
reply
Report
#4
Blame all those do-gooder anti death penalty people for this. A bullet to the head would be instant, but no they rather disallow such methods and force more "humane" methods such as lethal injections that have a higher chance of going wrong. Making those drugs difficult to get hold of makes the situation worse.
4
reply
Report
#5
(Original post by markyb76)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-28460647
I mean seriously?
How can it take 2 hours to execute someone? A few minutes high dose of helium would do it or a massive dose of opiates.
I hear the family arguing that they went through hell so who cares.
I would say if society chooses to use that as a bar and partake in barbaric and torturous practises like this, it is questionable if society is any better.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-28460647
I mean seriously?
How can it take 2 hours to execute someone? A few minutes high dose of helium would do it or a massive dose of opiates.
I hear the family arguing that they went through hell so who cares.
I would say if society chooses to use that as a bar and partake in barbaric and torturous practises like this, it is questionable if society is any better.
0
reply
Report
#6
(Original post by markyb76)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-28460647
I mean seriously?
How can it take 2 hours to execute someone? A few minutes high dose of helium would do it or a massive dose of opiates.
I hear the family arguing that they went through hell so who cares.
I would say if society chooses to use that as a bar and partake in barbaric and torturous practises like this, it is questionable if society is any better.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-28460647
I mean seriously?
How can it take 2 hours to execute someone? A few minutes high dose of helium would do it or a massive dose of opiates.
I hear the family arguing that they went through hell so who cares.
I would say if society chooses to use that as a bar and partake in barbaric and torturous practises like this, it is questionable if society is any better.
they need to do this for all executions
Slow and painful
Posted from TSR Mobile
3
reply
Report
#7
You wouldn't put a dangerous dog through a 2 hour death. Take them outside, put a couple of bullets in the back of their head and be done with it.
0
reply
Report
#8
(Original post by Pro Crastination)
It's disgusting, the practice should be banned outright - that's what EU countries are trying to achieve by banning the supply of certain chemicals.
It's disgusting, the practice should be banned outright - that's what EU countries are trying to achieve by banning the supply of certain chemicals.
0
reply
Report
#9
I don't agree with the death penalty. That aside, I believe a bullet to the head is more humane than the lethal injection. I find it disgusting that he was alive for two hours. Something is obviously massively wrong here.
1
reply
Report
#10
(Original post by Drewski)
It's not our place to interfere with the democratic decisions of another country. The will of the people in the US is to retain the death penalty. We have no right to mess with that.
It's not our place to interfere with the democratic decisions of another country. The will of the people in the US is to retain the death penalty. We have no right to mess with that.
2
reply
Report
#11
(Original post by Drewski)
It's not our place to interfere with the democratic decisions of another country. The will of the people in the US is to retain the death penalty. We have no right to mess with that.
It's not our place to interfere with the democratic decisions of another country. The will of the people in the US is to retain the death penalty. We have no right to mess with that.
2
reply
Report
#12
(Original post by Pro Crastination)
So let's just abolish all foreign policy, then? Seeing as that involves trying to influence other countries.
So let's just abolish all foreign policy, then? Seeing as that involves trying to influence other countries.
0
reply
Report
#14
(Original post by james22)
It is our right to stop supplying the chemicals and to urge them to end the death penalty.
It is our right to stop supplying the chemicals and to urge them to end the death penalty.
0
reply
Report
#15
I think what they've done is horrible and inhumane.
However if I was part of the victims family I would have no remorse.
However if I was part of the victims family I would have no remorse.
0
reply
Report
#16
Should have shot his **** off and let him bleed to death- he was a double murderer for God's sake! The same should happen to paedophiles.
0
reply
Report
#17
(Original post by Drewski)
Urging is different to coercing.
Urging is different to coercing.
0
reply
Report
#18
(Original post by markyb76)
I would say if society chooses to use that as a bar and partake in barbaric and torturous practises like this, it is questionable if society is any better.
I would say if society chooses to use that as a bar and partake in barbaric and torturous practises like this, it is questionable if society is any better.
0
reply
Report
#19
(Original post by Drewski)
Urging is different to coercing.
Urging is different to coercing.
0
reply
Report
#20
(Original post by Sephiroth)
Blame all those do-gooder anti death penalty people for this. A bullet to the head would be instant, but no they rather disallow such methods and force more "humane" methods such as lethal injections that have a higher chance of going wrong. Making those drugs difficult to get hold of makes the situation worse.
Blame all those do-gooder anti death penalty people for this. A bullet to the head would be instant, but no they rather disallow such methods and force more "humane" methods such as lethal injections that have a higher chance of going wrong. Making those drugs difficult to get hold of makes the situation worse.
0
reply
X
Quick Reply
