Anti-white FA boss Greg ****: "White and male FA must change"

Watch this thread
thesabbath
Badges: 2
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
Report Thread starter 7 years ago
#1
"OVERWHELMINGLY male and overwhelmingly white" Football Association chairman Greg **** said of his own organisation, saying the governing body must change.

In a pre-recorded video message to the Football Supporters Federation, former BBC director general ****, who took over from David Bernstein at the FA a year ago, said the governing body was in danger of becoming "irrelevant". "If you look at who's supporting, who's playing, football and then you look at the FA Council - it doesn’t represent them," said ****.
"It's still overwhelmingly male, overwhelmingly white in a world that isn't overwhelmingly male and white and somehow that has to be changed.
"We have to try and change it but we’re not alone, supporters have got to try and change it as well."
The FA Council consists of around 120 members from both the professional and amateur circles of the game and are responsible for helping to make policy decisions for the organisation.
The comments of ****, who once accused the BBC of being "hideously white", come after criticism of the FA's lack of diversity by the likes of former England defender Sol Campbell.

Campbell said in his biography this year that, had he been white, he would have captained England for 10 years.
"We've got to look at how we involve the population of 21st century England and the mix it's got," said ****. "If we just carry on like this - old, white males - we’re going to be increasingly irrelevant."

http://www.express.co.uk/sport/footb...FA-must-change
0
reply
thesabbath
Badges: 2
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report Thread starter 7 years ago
#2
The message appears to be that a "white" organisation (in a white country which has seen a recent influx of mass immigration) is not relevant to non-whites and therefore it must be changed.

What makes them think a "diverse" (read: non-white) organisation will be relevant to whites or even non-whites? Surely it is only relevant to those who worship the official state religion of "diversity".
1
reply
mojojojo101
Badges: 17
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
Report 7 years ago
#3
Personally I think the white / male thing is overblown, what the FA needs is diversity of opinion and attitude.

You can appoint all the black women you want but if they are drawn from the same, very small pool of people which the FA and other public institutions recruit from (note; there are probably no black women in that pool anyway so the point is moot) then nothing will change wrt significant and endemic problems in English football both on and off the pitch.

PS. Black women were just an example, could be any gender/race/sexuality mix, the point still stands.
0
reply
Zen Baphomet
Badges: 0
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#4
Report 7 years ago
#4
Good post.
0
reply
EllieC130
Badges: 15
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#5
Report 7 years ago
#5
No we don't HAVE to represent certain groups. If you find a female or someone of a different race who'd be good at the job then fine. But don't add randoms just for the sake of it. This sort of thing really pisses me off.
0
reply
imtelling
Badges: 4
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#6
Report 7 years ago
#6
You white British are a strange bunch. Happily dispossessing yourselves in your own country.

lemmings?
0
reply
Snagprophet
Badges: 17
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#7
Report 7 years ago
#7
If people wanted Women's football then they'd watch it. Also, most people in this country are white. If anything, there's too many non-natives being shoehorned in for the sake of the 'diversity' dogma.
0
reply
Quady
Badges: 20
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#8
Report 7 years ago
#8
(Original post by thesabbath)
The message appears to be that a "white" organisation (in a white country which has seen a recent influx of mass immigration) is not relevant to non-whites and therefore it must be changed.

What makes them think a "diverse" (read: non-white) organisation will be relevant to whites or even non-whites? Surely it is only relevant to those who worship the official state religion of "diversity".
Its not a white game though is it?

The country might be, the players aren't.

If this were the SFA you might have a decent point.

Hardly like the FA has coverd itself with glory over the last decade is it.
0
reply
European Pride
Badges: 0
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#9
Report 7 years ago
#9
This is why multiculturalism is evil
0
reply
Quady
Badges: 20
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#10
Report 7 years ago
#10
(Original post by European Pride)
This is why multiculturalism is evil
Because it makes our domestic football teams better...?
0
reply
Greg Jackson
Badges: 12
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#11
Report 7 years ago
#11
pathetic self hating cuckold
0
reply
European Pride
Badges: 0
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#12
Report 7 years ago
#12
(Original post by Quady)
Because it makes our domestic football teams better...?
Mo because it teaches that being white is something that is shameful. This is not the only example of an event or school or tv programme described as horrendously white
0
reply
Olie
Badges: 20
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#13
Report 7 years ago
#13
His comments are not 'anti-white', what is this ****ing Stormfront now and we're going to start using the ludicrous 'anti-racist is a code word for anti-white' motto :facepalm:

He's clearly just making the point that its probably time that more than just one group was represented in the FA. Whether you like it or not, Britain consists of both white and non-white people now, so surely its only fair and right that institutions like the FA at least aim to reflect that and represent all sections of society? I mean just look how many non-white footballers there are playing in this country now.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Have you done work experience at school/college?

Yes (121)
41.58%
Not yet, but I will soon (54)
18.56%
No (116)
39.86%

Watched Threads

View All