when women rule the world

GnomeMage

what will happen to men?

Reply 1

Tyrion_Lannister

Sounds like a prompt for a fem!dom porno..

Reply 2

GnomeMage

Original post by Tyrion_Lannister

Sounds like a prompt for a fem!dom porno..

just an imagination provoking thread :biggrin:

dont get angry.

Reply 3

Black Cat

We'll stop killing eachother

Reply 4

Okorange

Original post by GnomeMage

what will happen to men?

it wouldn't last, men would take over again. Women are way too catty to maintain power and there aren't enough dominant women to maintain power.

Reply 5

zKlown

Original post by Black Cat

We'll stop killing eachother

Real talk

If we lived in a world where the leaders were predominantly female, the world would be a better place.

Reply 6

8472

I think to the future of this. Only pain, humiliation and suffering do I see.

Spoiler

Reply 7

Lil08

Periods would be synced and there'd be wars every month.

(edited 9 years ago)

Reply 8

Tyrion_Lannister

Original post by GnomeMage

just an imagination provoking thread :biggrin:

dont get angry.

I wasn't angry? Just saying it sounded porny

Reply 9

manchesterunited15

Original post by GnomeMage

what will happen to men?

They'll climb on the back of pigs and go for a cruise in the sky

PS. 10,000th post :cool:

Reply 10

Blues Clues

Well if it's extremist feminists that are probably male trolls running this motha' then I guess we're screwed :biggrin:

Reply 11

bubadeeboop

dunno ...how exactly would an entire gender rule a planet? Please give more details.

Reply 12

Enoxial

Hope they will uphold humanity instead of following the US.

Reply 13

tomfailinghelp

Original post by bubadeeboop

dunno ...how exactly would an entire gender rule a planet? Please give more details.

Exactly.

I don't know, I guess if women ruled the world then it wouldn't be very well run, because half of the population would be rulers?

Reply 14

mynameisntbobk

Feminists will cease to exist? Am I right?

Reply 15

Zarah01

Once a month the world would get effed up

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 16

Biryani007

Free pads and tampons :biggrin:

Reply 17

JuliusSeizure

Free babies

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 18

username1341660

Well if a woman has given birth to you then why not?

There have been some great women rulers in this world too who have done a better job than most male rulers such as Joan Of Arc , Queen Elizabeth I and II, Margaret Thatcher, Boudicca and many more.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 19

bubadeeboop

Original post by Rakes

Okay first of all ...wut?

Now taking your comment as a stand alone comment I would like to correct a few inaccuracies.

Joan of Arc:
Joan of Arc was not the ruler of anything, she was a smybol due to her percieved divine connection, often described as a standard bearer. Though she was often present at war councils and held some rank she was in no way what so ever a ruler of anything, she had the support of the clergy and the nature of relgion and politics relationship in that time is reason she held any sway.

Queen Elizabeth I:
A brilliant political mind, born from the very necessity of survival, so suited for leadership was she that accusations of her being a man were common during her reign (no doubt reflective of contemporary attitudes towards gender roles, but none the less a indicator of her effectivness)
However from a military point of view her reign was not so successful, it should of course be noted she was juggling political problems bother at home and abroad, however in her reign England lost the French port Le Harve, the last time England would rule on the French mainland. And though most of the struggles leading to Victory over Spain and Ireland did occur during her reign, peace was not achieved until after her death, the later years of her reign saw some terrible persecution of Catholics within England as her paranoia intensified. Though she is definitely one of Englands greatest rulers, she was by no measure perfect and should not be blindly portrayed as such.

Queen Elizabeth II:

The power of the English monarch is "the right ‘to be consulted, to encourage and to warn." Walter Bagehot

She is a figurehead with no real power, she does not run the country, she does not make political decisions, she is consulted and has the privilage of voicing her opinion, though officially she can appoint and dismiss ministers, such an act would be highly frowned upon since it would be seen as crown interference with the democratic rights of the British people.

Margaret Thatcher:

I actually liked Mrs. Thatcher and believe her leadership was key to Britain navigating a period of international recession successfully, I also applaud her bold decision to swiftly liberate the Falkland Islands and the way she crush the union's grip on the British economy. However, one only has to mention her name outside of Kent or Sussex to see that many people do not hold her in such high esteem as myself.

Boudicca:

Boudicca was Queen of the Iceni, through marriage to her Husband Prasutagus King of the Iceni, it is not known how much authority of rulership she possed in reality. The fact remains that her period of leadership though initially devestating against the romans was little more than an uprising, lasted about a year AND was unsuccesful.

This women are noted in history for a reason, however it cannot be said that they are or were all great leaders and to suggest as much is at best romanticized hyperbole, at worst a willing ignorance of facts.

What you meant in your post in relation to the thread ...I'm not sure However I just wanted to address those points.