(Original post by Reformed)
the witnesses say when questioned about the attack he was sacked for trying to convert people
he was fired for trying to convert people to islam. he was a muslim, he came back and beheaded people. i know you are doing everything to subvert logical and pretend that isalm has never anything to do with crime - sometimes it does, you have no choice but accept it. people get fied al the time, why choose to behead someone? becuase the very act is islamic ( in the quran) islam doesnt need anyone else to demonise , it can do so from its own influence it seems.
yes it did, also read the 2nd link i posted for more details
again as i said before, he had a criminal history ( not of beheading though) often these sorts of people are drawn to islam as we know. once influnced by islam, he actually went ahead and beheaded someone. similar to the other cases we have heard where converts have beheaded people
Your article(s) didn't give a reason for the sacking but I'll assume that it was because he attempted to convert people, just for the sake of this reply. Cool lets start. Killing people for refusing to convert and killing people for getting fired are two different situations which arise from different causes(regardless of the conclusion). If he did kill them for refusing to convert then why did he wait till after he got fired? Surely as soon as they said no, he could've gone home and fetched his knife. But no. He only came back to work in a rage(with a weapon) after they sacked him. So this would point in the direction that he attacked people because he got sacked(and not because they refused to convert).
As the article also mentioned, the report suggested that he attacked people at random. Now if someone refused to convert and he got pissed off at them, then he would attack the person who refused, not just any random person at work.
I've read your second article too. So it says:
Alton Nolen – who has photos of Osama Bin Laden on a Facebook page under the name Jah’Keem Yisrael – was called into the management offices of the food-distribution company Thursday morning and fired for reasons that were not revealed publicly.
The tattooed ex-con, 30, stormed out of the plant and sped away in his car — but returned with a vengeance at around 4 p.m.
He allegedly barged inside and grabbed the long, thin-bladed knife he used while working there and turned it on the first person he saw, sources said.
It backs up what I said( thanks for pointing me towards it), he only went rage mode after he got fired, so it once again implies he killed (random) colleagues because he got fired(and not because they wouldn't convert to Islam).
You're trying too hard to blame this on Islam. Islam doesn't allow the killing of innocent people(nor forcing them to convert).
Try better next time, I rate your argument a 1/10.