# Challenging resistance calculation

Watch
Announcements

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

I found this question posted by StoneBridge some where. Anyway, I didn't really quite get it because I just confused things up and that's due to my lack of understanding to certain topics.

How i thought about it is using the idea of short circuit which is totally wrong, but i want to know why it won't work here? and if can be explained by it, how?

How i thought about it is using the idea of short circuit which is totally wrong, but i want to know why it won't work here? and if can be explained by it, how?

0

reply

Report

#2

It looks like only the middle resistor wouldn't work while the other two are in fact parallel with each other?

0

reply

Report

#3

(Original post by

I found this question posted by StoneBridge some where. Anyway, I didn't really quite get it because I just confused things up and that's due to my lack of understanding to certain topics.

How i thought about it is using the idea of short circuit which is totally wrong, but i want to know why it won't work here? and if can be explained by it, how?

**Daniel Atieh**)I found this question posted by StoneBridge some where. Anyway, I didn't really quite get it because I just confused things up and that's due to my lack of understanding to certain topics.

How i thought about it is using the idea of short circuit which is totally wrong, but i want to know why it won't work here? and if can be explained by it, how?

HINT:

Spoiler:

Try redrawing the circuit with a dc power source on the lhs between A and B and the three resistors arranged on the other three sides of a square. Finally draw in the conductors and follow the current paths around the formed loops according to Kirchoff's rules.

The s/c's definitely need to be taken into account and you can work out the resistance by inspection alone for both ac and dc.

Show

Try redrawing the circuit with a dc power source on the lhs between A and B and the three resistors arranged on the other three sides of a square. Finally draw in the conductors and follow the current paths around the formed loops according to Kirchoff's rules.

The s/c's definitely need to be taken into account and you can work out the resistance by inspection alone for both ac and dc.

0

reply

(Original post by

Think of the problem as one of voltages and currents. Using one terminal as a reference, what would the potential differences (voltage drops) around the circuit look like? Where would the current flow in a dc circuit first and then consider the same question for an ac circuit.

HINT:

**uberteknik**)Think of the problem as one of voltages and currents. Using one terminal as a reference, what would the potential differences (voltage drops) around the circuit look like? Where would the current flow in a dc circuit first and then consider the same question for an ac circuit.

HINT:

Spoiler:

Try redrawing the circuit with a dc power source on the lhs between A and B and the three resistors arranged on the other three sides of a square. Finally draw in the conductors and follow the current paths around the formed loops according to Kirchoff's rules.

The s/c's definitely need to be taken into account and you can work out the resistance by inspection alone for both ac and dc.

Show

Try redrawing the circuit with a dc power source on the lhs between A and B and the three resistors arranged on the other three sides of a square. Finally draw in the conductors and follow the current paths around the formed loops according to Kirchoff's rules.

The s/c's definitely need to be taken into account and you can work out the resistance by inspection alone for both ac and dc.

I'm pretty weak in this topic and I didn't quite follow all your points :/

When i first saw this question, i just followed the path of the current and imagined it in this way (which looks silly and incorrect):

So according to this diagram i drew, each resistor will receive a different current and therefore they re in parallel (i.e total R is R/3). I indicated each current by a different colour. So is my approach at least close to the correct way?

I m sorry, but as i said, am weak in this topic and your help here might contribute to a massive improvement in my understanding in such problems.

Thanks a ton once again!

0

reply

(Original post by

It looks like only the middle resistor wouldn't work while the other two are in fact parallel with each other?

**RoyalBlue7**)It looks like only the middle resistor wouldn't work while the other two are in fact parallel with each other?

0

reply

Report

#6

(Original post by

First of all, many thanks for your help, man!

I'm pretty weak in this topic and I didn't quite follow all your points :/

When i first saw this question, i just followed the path of the current and imagined it in this way (which looks silly and incorrect):

So according to this diagram i drew, each resistor will receive a different current and therefore they re in parallel (i.e total R is R/3). I indicated each current by a different colour. So is my approach at least close to the correct way?

I m sorry, but as i said, am weak in this topic and your help here might contribute to a massive improvement in my understanding in such problems.

Thanks a ton once again!

**Daniel Atieh**)First of all, many thanks for your help, man!

I'm pretty weak in this topic and I didn't quite follow all your points :/

When i first saw this question, i just followed the path of the current and imagined it in this way (which looks silly and incorrect):

So according to this diagram i drew, each resistor will receive a different current and therefore they re in parallel (i.e total R is R/3). I indicated each current by a different colour. So is my approach at least close to the correct way?

I m sorry, but as i said, am weak in this topic and your help here might contribute to a massive improvement in my understanding in such problems.

Thanks a ton once again!

Essentially all linear circuit problems come down to kirchoff's laws and the laws governing the components:

1. The sum of currents flowing into a node is zero. (Alternatively current into any point in a circuit is equal to the total current going out of it)

2. The voltage drop around ANY CLOSED loop is zero.

1

reply

Report

#7

(Original post by

I also thought like that in the first place, but the answer is R/3. I still didn't quite get how to approach to this answer exactly :/

**Daniel Atieh**)I also thought like that in the first place, but the answer is R/3. I still didn't quite get how to approach to this answer exactly :/

a) the 2nd node from the left is connected to B by a path of no resistance, so what is its potential?

b) the same question for the 3rd node from the left.

So

1. in which direction does the current flow through the central resistor and what is its magnitude?

2. the same question for the left and right hand resistors

That should give you enough info.

1

reply

(Original post by

It's sort of nearly there and gets the correct answer, you got the current loops going in the correct directions at least (though it actually doesn't usually matter).

Essentially all linear circuit problems come down to kirchoff's laws and the laws governing the components:

1. The sum of currents flowing into a node is zero. (Alternatively current into any point in a circuit is equal to the total current going out of it)

2. The voltage drop around ANY CLOSED loop is zero.

**natninja**)It's sort of nearly there and gets the correct answer, you got the current loops going in the correct directions at least (though it actually doesn't usually matter).

Essentially all linear circuit problems come down to kirchoff's laws and the laws governing the components:

1. The sum of currents flowing into a node is zero. (Alternatively current into any point in a circuit is equal to the total current going out of it)

2. The voltage drop around ANY CLOSED loop is zero.

(Original post by

Let the voltage at A be V volts and that at B be 0 volts. The note that:

a) the 2nd node from the left is connected to B by a path of no resistance, so what is its potential?

b) the same question for the 3rd node from the left.

So

1. in which direction does the current flow through the central resistor and what is its magnitude?

2. the same question for the left and right hand resistors

That should give you enough info.

**atsruser**)Let the voltage at A be V volts and that at B be 0 volts. The note that:

a) the 2nd node from the left is connected to B by a path of no resistance, so what is its potential?

b) the same question for the 3rd node from the left.

So

1. in which direction does the current flow through the central resistor and what is its magnitude?

2. the same question for the left and right hand resistors

That should give you enough info.

So...

As the voltage drop in each loop is zero, so each of the resistors receives full voltage say V and therefore they re therefore in a parallel connection right?

0

reply

Report

#9

(Original post by

Thanks a lot guys for your help

So...

As the voltage drop in each loop is zero, so each of the resistors receives full voltage say V and therefore they re therefore in a parallel connection right?

**Daniel Atieh**)Thanks a lot guys for your help

So...

As the voltage drop in each loop is zero, so each of the resistors receives full voltage say V and therefore they re therefore in a parallel connection right?

0

reply

Report

#10

**Daniel Atieh**)

I also thought like that in the first place, but the answer is R/3. I still didn't quite get how to approach to this answer exactly :/

0

reply

Report

#11

**Daniel Atieh**)

Thanks a lot guys for your help

So...

As the voltage drop in each loop is zero, so each of the resistors receives full voltage say V and therefore they re therefore in a parallel connection right?

0

reply

Report

#12

Yes, I did post this question some years ago.

Here's the original post and the replies.

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show...php?p=31142023

Yes, they are just 3 resistors in parallel.

Here's the original post and the replies.

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show...php?p=31142023

Yes, they are just 3 resistors in parallel.

0

reply

(Original post by

Yes, this is simply a parallel arrangement of 3 resistors redrawn to disguise that fact.

**atsruser**)Yes, this is simply a parallel arrangement of 3 resistors redrawn to disguise that fact.

Posted from TSR Mobile

0

reply

(Original post by

Yes, I did post this question some years ago.

Here's the original post and the replies.

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show...php?p=31142023

Yes, they are just 3 resistors in parallel.

**Stonebridge**)Yes, I did post this question some years ago.

Here's the original post and the replies.

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show...php?p=31142023

Yes, they are just 3 resistors in parallel.

Can you show me how i can develop two equations and then solve them simultaneously pls.

0

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top