mathsss surd helppppWatch

Announcements
#1
5- root3 / 2 + root3

in form of a + b root3 where a and b are integers
0
5 years ago
#2
(Original post by PerplexedBird)
5- root3 / 2 + root3

in form of a + b root3 where a and b are integers
What've you done so far?
0
#3
(Original post by Chlorophile)
What've you done so far?

Nothing I'm perplexed...
0
5 years ago
#4
(Original post by PerplexedBird)
Nothing I'm perplexed...
We want to get rid of the surd at the bottom. What do you think we could multiply 2+root3 by to get rid of the surd?
0
5 years ago
#5
(Original post by PerplexedBird)
Nothing I'm perplexed...
To make it easier and the answer more obvious, separate them into two separate fractions, then go by rules of how to divide two fractions.
0
5 years ago
#6
(Original post by Abbie :))
To make it easier and the answer more obvious, separate them into two separate fractions, then go by rules of how to divide two fractions.
I don't think that is what you should do... This is a rationalising denominators question. All you need to do is multiple the top and bottom by a specific number, which the OP should hopefully be able to work out.
0
5 years ago
#7
(Original post by Chlorophile)
I don't think that is what you should do... This is a rationalising denominators question. All you need to do is multiple the top and bottom by a specific number, which the OP should hopefully be able to work out.
I'd usually do it by rationalising the denominator, this is just a way a friend who was better at maths than myself showed me when I was struggling to understand how to do that.

edit; looking over it I don't even know if his method is mathematically sound .
0
5 years ago
#8
(Original post by Chlorophile)
I don't think that is what you should do... This is a rationalising denominators question. All you need to do is multiple the top and bottom by a specific number, which the OP should hopefully be able to work out.

(Original post by PerplexedBird)
5- root3 / 2 + root3

in form of a + b root3 where a and b are integers
Difference of 2 square
0
5 years ago
#9
(Original post by PILEDRIV3R WALTZ)
X
Posting solutions is against this subforum's rules. Simply giving an answer won't help the OP understand this problem.

(Original post by Abbie :))
I'd usually do it by rationalising the denominator, this is just a way a friend who was better at maths than myself showed me when I was struggling to understand how to do that.

edit; looking over it I don't even know if his method is mathematically sound .
I'm not entirely sure I understand it either? It just makes it more complicated and messy and you'll end up having to do the same thing?
0
5 years ago
#10
(Original post by Chlorophile)
I'm not entirely sure I understand it either? It just makes it more complicated and messy and you'll end up having to do the same thing?
Yeah, but he failed AH Maths after that so I guess I should've went elsewhere for help haha

Got to admit though, I'm struggling to see where difference of two squares comes into this
0
5 years ago
#11
(Original post by Abbie :))
Yeah, but he failed AH Maths after that so I guess I should've went elsewhere for help haha

Got to admit though, I'm struggling to see where difference of two squares comes into this
Try
0
5 years ago
#12
(Original post by Chlorophile)
Try
Aww I've never called that difference of two squares
0
5 years ago
#13

http://www.mathcentre.ac.uk/resource...rds-2009-1.pdf
0
5 years ago
#14
(Original post by Abbie :))
...
If you have

You'll notice for those two terms you get the difference of two squared terms; squaring the surd will result in rationalisation and that's why you multiply the numerator and the denominator by the conjugate of the denominator. In the example Chloro gave, you'll notice in the denominator you have an expression of the form

This corresponds to the difference of two squares.
0
5 years ago
#15
(Original post by Zen-Ali)
If you have

You'll notice for those two terms you get the difference of two squared terms; squaring the surd will result in rationalisation and that's why you multiply the numerator and the denominator by the conjugate of the denominator.
I didn't even notice that, thank you!
0
5 years ago
#16
(Original post by Abbie :))
Aww I've never called that difference of two squares
This is an absolutely typical question that crops up time and again. If you have a rational expression (P/Q) where Q is of the form a+b✓c then multiply top and bottom by a-b✓c. to get a^2-b^2 c on the bottom. This usually turns out to be a whole number which is easy to ultimately divide by. You then have to successfully negotiate the expansion of the numerator.
0
5 years ago
#17
(Original post by unclefred)
This is an absolutely typical question that crops up time and again. If you have a rational expression (P/Q) where Q is of the form a+b✓c then multiply top and bottom by a-b✓c. to get a^2-b^2 c on the bottom. This usually turns out to be a whole number which is easy to ultimately divide by. You then have to successfully negotiate the expansion of the numerator.
I don't know where my basic maths skills has went, I'm going to have to dig out S4 work

Oh that's me just realised I've stumbled onto A-level forum (which I thought would be a lot harder than surds) haha

Thank you for the help guys! I'm going to head back home to Scottish Qualifications lol
0
#18
(Original post by Chlorophile)
Try
Yes, thank-you, I did that but somehow when I expand, the answer is different, could you go further please?
0
X

new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

University open days

Thu, 24 Oct '19
• Cardiff University
Sat, 26 Oct '19
• Brunel University London
Sat, 26 Oct '19

Poll

Join the discussion

Yes (74)
24.1%
No (233)
75.9%