Henry, I've decided that I will not be contesting the revocation as a separate issue, and that I will focus entirely on the fact that the £500 offer constitued an offer, and that the revocation was not effective. For this reason, I will not be usin the Brimnes case, unless Katy or Daniel raise it in their arguments, and I've decided to go forward with Byrne v Van Tienhoven and Tayleo v Insurance which was held in the US Supreme Court. Although Tayleo was held in another jurisdiction, the mooting guidelines state that foreign cases can be influential.