Do you hate Americans?

Watch
NMiller5a
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#2541
Report 16 years ago
#2541
(Original post by Bismarck)
How could you not hate the American people when you hate everything they stand for (their morals and principles)?
Well, he said that hate was a strong word - and accordingly didn't use it. He said he disliked American morals/principles but American as people. I believe that is a logical statement.
0
reply
Bismarck
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#2542
Report 16 years ago
#2542
(Original post by NMiller5a)
Well, he said that hate was a strong word - and accordingly didn't use it. He said he disliked American morals/principles but American as people. I believe that is a logical statement.
How is it logical? Can I hate everything about you without hating you?
0
reply
NMiller5a
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#2543
Report 16 years ago
#2543
(Original post by Alexdel)
So you are suggesting that Iraq who had a similar way of running the economy to China was worthy of being invaded? And yes for communism to be true communism it has to be totalitarian since it would be the only way of ensuring everyone was equal.
Well, in theory, pure communism is much closer to anarchy than totalitarianism... Communism is supposedly only totalitarian when it's in the "transition" stage.
0
reply
Alexdel
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#2544
Report 16 years ago
#2544
(Original post by Bismarck)
China stopped ensuring that everyone was equal 20 years ago.
Its all a theory sunshine...in practice nothing its like its supposed to be just like like the US pretending to be a democracy.
0
reply
NMiller5a
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#2545
Report 16 years ago
#2545
(Original post by Bismarck)
How is it logical? Can I hate everything about you without hating you?
No, but I can dislike your beliefs while not disliking you as a person... that's what he said. You may dislike a person's political beliefs and while still liking that person for other reasons.
0
reply
Bismarck
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#2546
Report 16 years ago
#2546
(Original post by NMiller5a)
No, but I can dislike your beliefs while not disliking you as a person... that's what he said. You may dislike a person's political beliefs and while still liking that person for other reasons.
A person's morals and principles are much more than just their political beliefs.
0
reply
NMiller5a
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#2547
Report 16 years ago
#2547
(Original post by Alexdel)
Its all a theory sunshine...in practice nothing its like its supposed to be just like like the US pretending to be a democracy.
In all honest I despise George Bush, but how are the UK or Canada any more democratic? Labour won barely more than a third of the vote yet commands an overwhelming control over Parliament, and the NDP received over 20% of the vote yet has something like 14 seats...
0
reply
Alexdel
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#2548
Report 16 years ago
#2548
(Original post by NMiller5a)
Well, in theory, pure communism is much closer to anarchy than totalitarianism... Communism is supposedly only totalitarian when it's in the "transition" stage.
hmm...well communism stems mainly from Marx ideas and from them you can deduce a main role of a government which helps establish proletariat. His model could never have worked with no means of achieving it in the first place. I mean how do you ensure equality for all with anarchy.
0
reply
Alexdel
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#2549
Report 16 years ago
#2549
(Original post by NMiller5a)
In all honest I despise George Bush, but how are the UK or Canada any more democratic? Labour won barely more than a third of the vote yet commands an overwhelming control over Parliament, and the NDP received over 20% of the vote yet has something like 14 seats...
I agree....in fact I have written long essays on the subject and the more I wrote the more I convinced myself that unless you have a direct 100% partecipation it is not democracy...obviously in the 21st century it is not practical so we have to settle for the next best thing...
0
reply
NMiller5a
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#2550
Report 16 years ago
#2550
(Original post by Bismarck)
A person's morals and principles are much more than just their political beliefs.
Just as hate is much more than dislike.
0
reply
Bismarck
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#2551
Report 16 years ago
#2551
(Original post by Alexdel)
I agree....in fact I have written long essays on the subject and the more I wrote the more I convinced myself that unless you have a direct 100% partecipation it is not democracy...obviously in the 21st century it is not practical so we have to settle for the next best thing...
Ah, you think forcing people to vote is democratic while having people choose not to vote is not?
0
reply
NMiller5a
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#2552
Report 16 years ago
#2552
(Original post by Alexdel)
hmm...well communism stems mainly from Marx ideas and from them you can deduce a main role of a government which helps establish proletariat. His model could never have worked with no means of achieving it in the first place. I mean how do you ensure equality for all with anarchy.
Well, that's what I said, communism is totalitarian thereoretically only during the "transition" state towards pure communism. Obviously a very long transition process has to go into ingraining people with a sense of equality so that capitalistic tendencies are thoroughly eradicated, and when the time comes that they have finally been so, then the government ceases to exist because there is no reason for it. It's anarchy in the sense of it being government-less, but since it assumes that people will voluntarially follow certain guidelines as intrinsic laws of life that can never be violated it really isn't pure anarachy, as there are still laws governing behaviour.
0
reply
Alexdel
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#2553
Report 16 years ago
#2553
(Original post by Bismarck)
Ah, you think forcing people to vote is democratic while having people choose not to vote is not?
Do you actually read and use your brain to process what is being looked at by your eyes....read carefully I shall explain really really slowly...here it goes....democracy...in my opinion...cannot be true democracy....unless....it....is....a 100% participation...by all in the passing of all laws...this...is....an ...evaluation of democray....not....of....what ....i believe....should.....be done.....and....when i ....said....we...settle...for...it...as next....best thing....i mean we...as....a.....society....

Kapish? I mean i know the damage of the media has been extensive but this is just hopeless.
0
reply
NMiller5a
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#2554
Report 16 years ago
#2554
(Original post by Bismarck)
Ah, you think forcing people to vote is democratic while having people choose not to vote is not?
I like that. Kind of like forcing republics upon people and ensuring that they don't tip into theocracies is undemocratic.
0
reply
NMiller5a
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#2555
Report 16 years ago
#2555
(Original post by Alexdel)
Do you actually read and use your brain to process what is being looked at by your eyes....read carefully I shall explain really really slowly...here it goes....democracy...in my opinion...cannot be true democracy....unless....it....is....a 100% participation...by all in the passing of all laws...this...is....an ...evaluation of democray....not....of....what ....i believe....should.....be done.....and....when i ....said....we...settle...for...it...as next....best thing....i mean we...as....a.....society....

Kapish? I mean i know the damage of the media has been extensive but this is just hopeless.
Ah, the media, the strangest political particpatory institution ever devised. In some ways it directs public opinion indepedent of government control, in others it is self-censored to not disagree too openly to governmental policy. I don't know where to begin.
0
reply
Kondar
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#2556
Report 16 years ago
#2556
(Original post by Bismarck)
Is it unjust merely because you're unwilling/unable to partake in this profit-taking? How can you say that a system that allows anyone who takes part in it to prosper is unfair?
How about this??

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...International/
0
reply
djchak
Badges: 9
Rep:
?
#2557
Report 16 years ago
#2557
(Original post by Bismarck)
A person's morals and principles are much more than just their political beliefs.

Absolutely agreed . His statement made no sense.
0
reply
Bismarck
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#2558
Report 16 years ago
#2558
(Original post by Kondar)
How about this??

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...International/
Absolute disgrace passed by SC justices who have never taken an economics course in their life. In case you were wondering, the four conservative judges on the SC opposed this decision (not that I usually support the interpretation of the conservative judges).
0
reply
psychic_satori
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#2559
Report 16 years ago
#2559
(Original post by Bismarck)
Absolute disgrace passed by SC justices who have never taken an economics course in their live. In case you were wondering, the four conservative judges on the SC opposed this decision (not that I usually support the interpretation of the conservative judges).
That eminent domain ruling really had me hating the SC, particularly in another thread yesterday. I'm still seething a bit from their ridiculous decision.
0
reply
Bismarck
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#2560
Report 16 years ago
#2560
(Original post by psychic_satori)
That eminent domain ruling really had me hating the SC, particularly in another thread yesterday. I'm still seething a bit from their ridiculous decision.
Objectivists are good for something.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Do you think mandatory Relationships and Sex Education in secondary schools is a good idea?

Yes (336)
83.79%
No (65)
16.21%

Watched Threads

View All