Is Rachel Riley the perfect human being? Watch

Anonymous #1
#1
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#1
According to my calculations, she's a 10/10.

She can get two from the top ANYTIME.
reply
Yeah dude
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#2
Report 4 years ago
#2
I looked her up, my extensive research said yes sir


Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Anonymous #1
#3
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#3
(Original post by Yeah dude)
I looked her up, my extensive research said yes sir


Posted from TSR Mobile
That's why we get on
reply
Yeah dude
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#4
Report 4 years ago
#4
(Original post by Anonymous)
That's why we get on
How long did you research for? Where was the scene of your research?


Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Anonymous #1
#5
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#5
(Original post by Yeah dude)
How long did you research for? Where was the scene of your research?


Posted from TSR Mobile
A few months, and in my bedroom "watching" Countdown
reply
Yeah dude
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#6
Report 4 years ago
#6
(Original post by Anonymous)
A few months, and in my bedroom "watching" Countdown
I hear ya dude


Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Maid Marian
Badges: 20
#7
Report 4 years ago
#7
Lol no, Emma Watson is. :daydreaming:
reply
Balloon Baboon
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#8
Report 4 years ago
#8
(Original post by Anonymous)
According to my calculations, she's a 10/10.

She can get two from the top ANYTIME.

Rachel Bilson or that girl from Hansel and Gretel.
0
reply
Genocidal
Badges: 16
#9
Report 4 years ago
#9
(Original post by Maid Marian)
Lol no, Emma Watson is. :daydreaming:
Right up until she started involving herself in things outside of acting.

Nothing worse than an actor trying to be political or moral. Every time you look at them you just wonder whether they're serious or after the publicity.
reply
Maid Marian
Badges: 20
#10
Report 4 years ago
#10
(Original post by Genocidal)
Right up until she started involving herself in things outside of acting.

Nothing worse than an actor trying to be political or moral. Every time you look at them you just wonder whether they're serious or after the publicity.
How ridiculous! Emma Watson definitely does not court publicity and she has enough money in the bank not to need it. It's pretty clear to me that she gets involved in things because she wants to and genuinely believes in it, and God damn she should have that right.
reply
tillytots
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#11
Report 4 years ago
#11
Pretty much yeah
0
reply
Anonymous #2
#12
Report 4 years ago
#12
(Original post by Anonymous)
According to my calculations, she's a 10/10.

She can get two from the top ANYTIME.
She went to my school (y)
reply
Balloon Baboon
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#13
Report 4 years ago
#13
(Original post by Genocidal)
Right up until she started involving herself in things outside of acting.

Nothing worse than an actor trying to be political or moral. Every time you look at them you just wonder whether they're serious or after the publicity.

She has a degree from one of the best universities in the world. Did she need to go and work hard for it? of course not, she's a millionaire. Nothing worse than hating on someone doing well for themself.
6
reply
Maid Marian
Badges: 20
#14
Report 4 years ago
#14
(Original post by Lee R)
She has a degree from one of the best universities in the world. Did she need to go and work hard for it? of course not, she's a millionaire. Nothing worse than hating on someone doing well for themself.
Spot on.
reply
cosmiccurtains
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#15
Report 4 years ago
#15
(Original post by anonymous)
according to my calculations, she's a 10/10.

She can get two from the top anytime.
yup. Yup. Yup
0
reply
Anonymous #1
#16
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#16
Guys stop being wrong by mentioning other women. Only one woman is worthy of the title of sexiest most perfect queen of the world, Rachel Riley.
reply
Genocidal
Badges: 16
#17
Report 4 years ago
#17
(Original post by Maid Marian)
How ridiculous! Emma Watson definitely does not court publicity and she has enough money in the bank not to need it. It's pretty clear to me that she gets involved in things because she wants to and genuinely believes in it, and God damn she should have that right.
There's a big difference between wanting and needing. Alan Sugar has more than enough money yet he doesn't retire. Bono is world famous yet he still feels the need to put himself about like the **** he is. And the countless other examples of wealthy people who continue on earning and earning despite not needing it. I don't see why Emma Watson is any different.

Just another big mouth actor looking for publicity. It's even worse with American actors because practically every actor minor or major will support some sort of charity by default. They'll sign a cheque, turn up every so often for a few photos, and that's it.
reply
Genocidal
Badges: 16
#18
Report 4 years ago
#18
(Original post by Lee R)
She has a degree from one of the best universities in the world. Did she need to go and work hard for it? of course not, she's a millionaire. Nothing worse than hating on someone doing well for themself.
Bit of a jump assuming is jealous because they're critical. I like how it's the same with any actor. Anyone who's critical or accusing will be met by a supporter who automatically accuses them of being jealous. And as I said in the other post there's a big difference wanting and needing.
reply
Afghan Warrior
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#19
Report 4 years ago
#19
No. Not perfect

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Black Cat
Badges: 20
#20
Report 4 years ago
#20
A poor mans Paris Hilton, 6/10 at best
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Have you registered to vote?

Yes! (236)
39.14%
No - but I will (41)
6.8%
No - I don't want to (45)
7.46%
No - I can't vote (<18, not in UK, etc) (281)
46.6%

Watched Threads

View All