Back
to top
Is Geothermal Energy a form of indirect solar energy?
Watch this threadPage 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
davidtyoember
Badges:
9
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
Joinedup
Badges:
20
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report
#2
No - that heat was 'put there' when the planet was formed by gravitational accretion (some contribution from nuclear reactions too but not much iirc) it wasn't radiated in from the sun. if you could switch the sun off the heat in the molten core would still be there...
therefore It's different from wind or hydro which are dependent on weather systems which are being continually driven by insolation, or fossil fuel which is fossilised solar radiation from the past.
therefore It's different from wind or hydro which are dependent on weather systems which are being continually driven by insolation, or fossil fuel which is fossilised solar radiation from the past.
0
reply
davidtyoember
Badges:
9
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
(Original post by Joinedup)
No - that heat was 'put there' when the planet was formed by gravitational accretion (some contribution from nuclear reactions too but not much iirc) it wasn't radiated in from the sun. if you could switch the sun off the heat in the molten core would still be there...
therefore It's different from wind or hydro which are dependent on weather systems which are being continually driven by insolation, or fossil fuel which is fossilised solar radiation from the past.
No - that heat was 'put there' when the planet was formed by gravitational accretion (some contribution from nuclear reactions too but not much iirc) it wasn't radiated in from the sun. if you could switch the sun off the heat in the molten core would still be there...
therefore It's different from wind or hydro which are dependent on weather systems which are being continually driven by insolation, or fossil fuel which is fossilised solar radiation from the past.
0
reply
uberteknik
Badges:
21
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#4
Report
#4
(Original post by davidtyoember)
oooh I see, so in theory, even if for some reason we stopped getting sunlight, if we were underground and had enough preserved food and water and access to geothermal power we could survive for a long period of time?
oooh I see, so in theory, even if for some reason we stopped getting sunlight, if we were underground and had enough preserved food and water and access to geothermal power we could survive for a long period of time?
Months or perhaps a few years may well be possible.
But unless science develops a method of cultivating food sources which do not require photosynthesis or at least geothermal/nuclear energy is harnessed to produce light enough for photosynthesis on an industrial farming scale, then living underground beyond that timeframe becomes increasingly unlikely.
Human interstellar and deep space missions lasting years, will also need to solve similar problems.
0
reply
davidtyoember
Badges:
9
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#5
(Original post by uberteknik)
Depends on what you mean by a 'long period' of time.
Months or perhaps a few years may well be possible.
But unless science develops a method of cultivating food sources which do not require photosynthesis or at least geothermal/nuclear energy is harnessed to produce light enough for photosynthesis on an industrial farming scale, then living underground beyond that timeframe becomes increasingly unlikely.
Human interstellar and deep space missions lasting years, will also need to solve similar problems.
Depends on what you mean by a 'long period' of time.
Months or perhaps a few years may well be possible.
But unless science develops a method of cultivating food sources which do not require photosynthesis or at least geothermal/nuclear energy is harnessed to produce light enough for photosynthesis on an industrial farming scale, then living underground beyond that timeframe becomes increasingly unlikely.
Human interstellar and deep space missions lasting years, will also need to solve similar problems.
0
reply
davidtyoember
Badges:
9
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#6
(Original post by uberteknik)
Depends on what you mean by a 'long period' of time.
Months or perhaps a few years may well be possible.
But unless science develops a method of cultivating food sources which do not require photosynthesis or at least geothermal/nuclear energy is harnessed to produce light enough for photosynthesis on an industrial farming scale, then living underground beyond that timeframe becomes increasingly unlikely.
Human interstellar and deep space missions lasting years, will also need to solve similar problems.
Depends on what you mean by a 'long period' of time.
Months or perhaps a few years may well be possible.
But unless science develops a method of cultivating food sources which do not require photosynthesis or at least geothermal/nuclear energy is harnessed to produce light enough for photosynthesis on an industrial farming scale, then living underground beyond that timeframe becomes increasingly unlikely.
Human interstellar and deep space missions lasting years, will also need to solve similar problems.
) grow certain plants (
) in their houses without using natural sunlight.
0
reply
Chlorophile
Badges:
20
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#7
Report
#7
(Original post by davidtyoember)
oooh I see, so in theory, even if for some reason we stopped getting sunlight, if we were underground and had enough preserved food and water and access to geothermal power we could survive for a long period of time?
oooh I see, so in theory, even if for some reason we stopped getting sunlight, if we were underground and had enough preserved food and water and access to geothermal power we could survive for a long period of time?
0
reply
uberteknik
Badges:
21
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#8
Report
#8
(Original post by davidtyoember)
By Long period of time I mean some tens of thousands of years or so
By Long period of time I mean some tens of thousands of years or so
Geothermal on it's own does not have the energy density needed for serious power uses like the large scale generation of electricity for high power applications (factories, cities etc).
Perhaps when science develops fusion power sources and we harness the output for everyday use and put in place plans for migrating underground, then it may be possible sometime in the next few centuries to support a small population as Chlorophile suggests. Your guess is as good as anyone else's though.
0
reply
davidtyoember
Badges:
9
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#9
(Original post by uberteknik)
We are in the realms of pure speculation now. Never say impossible but at the current state of technology, food production methods (food preservation currently only lasts a handful of years), medicines, engineering capability etc. nigh on impossible.
Geothermal on it's own does not have the energy density needed for serious power uses like the large scale generation of electricity for high power applications (factories, cities etc).
Perhaps when science develops fusion power sources and we harness the output for everyday use, then it may be possible sometime in the next few centuries. Your guess is as good as anyone else's though.
We are in the realms of pure speculation now. Never say impossible but at the current state of technology, food production methods (food preservation currently only lasts a handful of years), medicines, engineering capability etc. nigh on impossible.
Geothermal on it's own does not have the energy density needed for serious power uses like the large scale generation of electricity for high power applications (factories, cities etc).
Perhaps when science develops fusion power sources and we harness the output for everyday use, then it may be possible sometime in the next few centuries. Your guess is as good as anyone else's though.
0
reply
Chlorophile
Badges:
20
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#10
Report
#10
(Original post by uberteknik)
We are in the realms of pure speculation now. Never say impossible but at the current state of technology, food production methods (food preservation currently only lasts a handful of years), medicines, engineering capability etc. nigh on impossible.
Geothermal on it's own does not have the energy density needed for serious power uses like the large scale generation of electricity for high power applications (factories, cities etc).
Perhaps when science develops fusion power sources and we harness the output for everyday use and put in place plans for migrating underground, then it may be possible sometime in the next few centuries to support a small population as Chlorophile suggests. Your guess is as good as anyone else's though.
We are in the realms of pure speculation now. Never say impossible but at the current state of technology, food production methods (food preservation currently only lasts a handful of years), medicines, engineering capability etc. nigh on impossible.
Geothermal on it's own does not have the energy density needed for serious power uses like the large scale generation of electricity for high power applications (factories, cities etc).
Perhaps when science develops fusion power sources and we harness the output for everyday use and put in place plans for migrating underground, then it may be possible sometime in the next few centuries to support a small population as Chlorophile suggests. Your guess is as good as anyone else's though.
0
reply
uberteknik
Badges:
21
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#11
Report
#11
(Original post by Chlorophile)
It definitely does in some areas, Iceland's doing pretty well! Obviously it's got a very small population but still, they're (pretty) civilized.
It definitely does in some areas, Iceland's doing pretty well! Obviously it's got a very small population but still, they're (pretty) civilized.
0
reply
Chlorophile
Badges:
20
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#12
Report
#12
(Original post by uberteknik)
Certain types of industry, but not for things like large scale steel smelting and production, chemical plants etc. Iceland is still heavily reliant on imports for these essentials.
Certain types of industry, but not for things like large scale steel smelting and production, chemical plants etc. Iceland is still heavily reliant on imports for these essentials.
0
reply
uberteknik
Badges:
21
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#13
Report
#13
(Original post by Chlorophile)
As far as I'm aware, Iceland produces a lot of excess energy which is used to drive their aluminium extraction industry? And besides, if some kind of apocalypse really did lead to the sun going out, I don't think steel smelting would be our biggest concern!
As far as I'm aware, Iceland produces a lot of excess energy which is used to drive their aluminium extraction industry? And besides, if some kind of apocalypse really did lead to the sun going out, I don't think steel smelting would be our biggest concern!
But I get your drift!
0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
