The Student Room Group

Why are we told to embrace transsexualism?

Scroll to see replies

Original post by cole-slaw
Resorting to personal insults now?

You might as well just type "I have nothing valid to say".

The definition of sex is here to stay. If you don't like it, start a new thread where you can whine all you like about how unfair the world is.

But in THIS thread, we're using the current, medical definition. So either accept that or don't comment.


Personal insult? You haven't actually interacted with my argument. You just keep yelling its not valid because you have one definition which has been contested in scientific literature. But its 'conventional' so don't worry. :rolleyes:
Original post by cole-slaw
Resorting to personal insults now?

You might as well just type "I have nothing valid to say".

The definition of sex is here to stay. If you don't like it, start a new thread where you can whine all you like about how unfair the world is.

But in THIS thread, we're using the current, medical definition. So either accept that or don't comment.


I think debating whether or not one can change their sex is fundamental in this thread - as sex reassignment surgery is the main treatment for transsexualism and gender dismorphic disorder.
Given that the medical definition you have put forward doesn't account for the anomalies and those who are intersex, I'm not sure it's much use in this thread. Why would a procedure of sex reassignment surgery exist within medicine if we're all accepting that XY = male and XX = female?
Original post by minimarshmallow
I think debating whether or not one can change their sex is fundamental in this thread - as sex reassignment surgery is the main treatment for transsexualism and gender dismorphic disorder.?


But contesting that point by ignorantly refusing to use the accepted convention biological definition of sex is not debating, its semantic obfuscation, filibustering nonsense. It gets us nowhere and proves nothing.


Given that the medical definition you have put forward doesn't account for the anomalies and those who are intersex, I'm not sure it's much use in this thread. Why would a procedure of sex reassignment surgery exist within medicine if we're all accepting that XY = male and XX = female


because it relieves the psychological distress caused by gender dismorphia. The doctors carrying out the operation are under no illusions, they know they are not actually changing the sex of the person they are operating on, they are just giving them a body that their mind feels more comfortable with.

At least that is the intention - the evidence suggests that it rarely actually achieves this objective.

If we can't agree to use the orthodox definition of sex, then this whole discussion is a waste of time. You can't argue about terms without first agreeing on their meaning.
Original post by RandZul'Zorander
Personal insult? You haven't actually interacted with my argument. You just keep yelling its not valid because you have one definition which has been contested in scientific literature. But its 'conventional' so don't worry. :rolleyes:



Its not actually seriously contested though, there is no danger of the definition changing any time, ever.

Either use the current definition or stop spamming the thread with your unpleasant transphobic comments.
Original post by cole-slaw
But contesting that point by ignorantly refusing to use the accepted convention biological definition of sex is not debating, its semantic obfuscation, filibustering nonsense. It gets us nowhere and proves nothing.


I would argue that you aren't debating either. You're just refusing to listen to his point and repeating yourself.
And he isn't just ignorantly refusing, he is a former student of sex and gender who is providing you with evidence to back up his point.

because it relieves the psychological distress caused by gender dismorphia. The doctors carrying out the operation are under no illusions, they know they are not actually changing the sex of the person they are operating on, they are just giving them a body that their mind feels more comfortable with.

At least that is the intention - the evidence suggests that it rarely actually achieves this objective.

If we can't agree to use the orthodox definition of sex, then this whole discussion is a waste of time. You can't argue about terms without first agreeing on their meaning.


Yet they get a sex reassignment certificate, and are listed as the opposite sex on their passport, driving license etc.
Sex, although probably not as complex as gender, is not as simple as chromosomes and sex organs - because chromosomes and sex organs are not as simple as XX-vagina and XY-penis.

Well, why not have a civil debate to reach a consensus on what is meant by sex, and then go from there. It seems to be fundamental to the debate to reach an agreement about what you mean by sex.
Original post by minimarshmallow
I would argue that you aren't debating either. You're just refusing to listen to his point and repeating yourself.
And he isn't just ignorantly refusing, he is a former student of sex and gender who is providing you with evidence to back up his point.



The definition is what it is. This thread does not exist for him to complain that he doesn't like the definition. If he doesn't like it, he can start another thread where he can complain about it.




Yet they get a sex reassignment certificate, and are listed as the opposite sex on their passport, driving license etc.




That is their gender that is listed as a simple courtesy. Their actual sex remains unchanged. I'm sure you're not so stupid as to think that what it says on someone's driving licence is relevant to a biological fact.

[Sex, although probably not as complex as gender, is not as simple as chromosomes and sex organs - because chromosomes and sex organs are not as simple as XX-vagina and XY-penis.


Yes it is. Please look it up if you're confused about this very simple point.



Well, why not have a civil debate to reach a consensus on what is meant by sex, and then go from there. It seems to be fundamental to the debate to reach an agreement about what you mean by sex.


It is not up to us to agree on what we mean by sex, the word has an official definition already, which I have given. Our opinions are irrelevant on this matter.
Sex: the fundamental distinction, found in most species of animals and plants, based on the type of gametes produced by the individual; also the category to which the individual fits on the basis of that criterion

sex
1. the fundamental distinction, found in most species of animals and plants, based on the type of gametes produced by the individual or the category to which the individual fits on the basis of that criterion. Ova, or macrogametes, are produced by the female, and spermatozoa, or microgametes, are produced by the male. The union of these distinctive germ cells results in the production of a new individual in sexual reproduction.





McGraw-Hill Concise Dictionary of Modern Medicine. © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

sex (seks), 1. The biologic character or quality that distinguishes male and female from one another as expressed by analysis of the person's gonadal, morphologic (internal and external), chromosomal, and hormonal characteristics. Compare: gender.
2. The physiologic and psychological processes within a person that prompt behavior related to procreation or erotic pleasure.
[L. sexus]


Farlex Partner Medical Dictionary © Farlex 2012

sex (seks) 1. The biologic character or quality that distinguishes male and female from one another as expressed by analysis of the individual's gonadal, morphologic (internal and external), chromosomal, and hormonal characteristics.






sex biological quality distinguishing male and female, expressed by the presence of two X (i.e. female) or X + Y (i.e. male) chromosomes



chromosomal sex , genetic sex sex as determined by the presence of the XX (female) or the XY (male) genotype in somatic cells, without regard to phenotypic manifestations.
gonadal sex that part of the phenotypic sex that is determined by the gonadal tissue present (ovarian or testicular).
morphological sex that part of the phenotypic sex that is determined by the morphology of the external genitals.
phenotypic sex the phenotypic manifestations of sex determined by endocrine influences.
Original post by cole-slaw
The definition is what it is. This thread does not exist for him to complain that he doesn't like the definition. If he doesn't like it, he can start another thread where he can complain about it.



That is their gender that is listed as a simple courtesy. Their actual sex remains unchanged. I'm sure you're not so stupid as to think that what it says on someone's driving licence is relevant to a biological fact.



Yes it is. Please look it up if you're confused about this very simple point.



It is not up to us to agree on what we mean by sex, the word has an official definition already, which I have given. Our opinions are irrelevant on this matter.


Androgen insensitivity syndrome means that people with XY chromosomes have vaginas. There are people with XXY, XYY, XXX etc. There are genetic mosaics who have both XX and XY chromosomes - and often but not always have ambiguous genitals.

Sex is not clear cut. Intersex shows us this.
Therefore you have a conventional definition, but given that this is not universally accepted, it is necessary for us to look at alternatives in the context of this thread.

All things 'determining' sex in almost all of the literature that I have encountered use 'in general', therefore acknowledging that there are anomalies, and that the definition is not perfect as it does not account for these.
Original post by cole-slaw
Sex: the fundamental distinction, found in most species of animals and plants, based on the type of gametes produced by the individual; also the category to which the individual fits on the basis of that criterion

sex
1. the fundamental distinction, found in most species of animals and plants, based on the type of gametes produced by the individual or the category to which the individual fits on the basis of that criterion. Ova, or macrogametes, are produced by the female, and spermatozoa, or microgametes, are produced by the male. The union of these distinctive germ cells results in the production of a new individual in sexual reproduction.





McGraw-Hill Concise Dictionary of Modern Medicine. © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

sex (seks), 1. The biologic character or quality that distinguishes male and female from one another as expressed by analysis of the person's gonadal, morphologic (internal and external), chromosomal, and hormonal characteristics. Compare: gender.
2. The physiologic and psychological processes within a person that prompt behavior related to procreation or erotic pleasure.
[L. sexus]


Farlex Partner Medical Dictionary © Farlex 2012

sex (seks) 1. The biologic character or quality that distinguishes male and female from one another as expressed by analysis of the individual's gonadal, morphologic (internal and external), chromosomal, and hormonal characteristics.






sex biological quality distinguishing male and female, expressed by the presence of two X (i.e. female) or X + Y (i.e. male) chromosomes



chromosomal sex , genetic sex sex as determined by the presence of the XX (female) or the XY (male) genotype in somatic cells, without regard to phenotypic manifestations.
gonadal sex that part of the phenotypic sex that is determined by the gonadal tissue present (ovarian or testicular).
morphological sex that part of the phenotypic sex that is determined by the morphology of the external genitals.
phenotypic sex the phenotypic manifestations of sex determined by endocrine influences.


There are at least four different definitions there...
Original post by cole-slaw
Sex: the fundamental distinction, found in most species of animals and plants, based on the type of gametes produced by the individual; also the category to which the individual fits on the basis of that criterion

sex
1. the fundamental distinction, found in most species of animals and plants, based on the type of gametes produced by the individual or the category to which the individual fits on the basis of that criterion. Ova, or macrogametes, are produced by the female, and spermatozoa, or microgametes, are produced by the male. The union of these distinctive germ cells results in the production of a new individual in sexual reproduction.





McGraw-Hill Concise Dictionary of Modern Medicine. © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

sex (seks), 1. The biologic character or quality that distinguishes male and female from one another as expressed by analysis of the person's gonadal, morphologic (internal and external), chromosomal, and hormonal characteristics. Compare: gender.
2. The physiologic and psychological processes within a person that prompt behavior related to procreation or erotic pleasure.
[L. sexus]


Farlex Partner Medical Dictionary © Farlex 2012

sex (seks) 1. The biologic character or quality that distinguishes male and female from one another as expressed by analysis of the individual's gonadal, morphologic (internal and external), chromosomal, and hormonal characteristics.






sex biological quality distinguishing male and female, expressed by the presence of two X (i.e. female) or X + Y (i.e. male) chromosomes



chromosomal sex , genetic sex sex as determined by the presence of the XX (female) or the XY (male) genotype in somatic cells, without regard to phenotypic manifestations.
gonadal sex that part of the phenotypic sex that is determined by the gonadal tissue present (ovarian or testicular).
morphological sex that part of the phenotypic sex that is determined by the morphology of the external genitals.
phenotypic sex the phenotypic manifestations of sex determined by endocrine influences.


Thank you for proving my point. Sex is not as simple as you tried to make it out to be. :h:
Original post by minimarshmallow
Androgen insensitivity syndrome means that people with XY chromosomes have vaginas. There are people with XXY, XYY, XXX etc. There are genetic mosaics who have both XX and XY chromosomes - and often but not always have ambiguous genitals.

Sex is not clear cut. Intersex shows us this.
Therefore you have a conventional definition, but given that this is not universally accepted, it is necessary for us to look at alternatives in the context of this thread.

All things 'determining' sex in almost all of the literature that I have encountered use 'in general', therefore acknowledging that there are anomalies, and that the definition is not perfect as it does not account for these.



Nope, sorry. The presence of a small number of people with recognised conditions caused by genetic abnormalities that place them outside of the male-female dichotomy does NOT in any way, shape, or form invalidate the orthodox classification of a bipartite sex categorisation system.

The system of sexual reproduction is by definition built around TWO distinct sub-populations of the species that produce complementary gamete types based on their chromosomes. You are either one or the other. (or you have some kind of genetic condition that is completely unrelated to this discussion)

Why do people keep bringing up Klinefelter's syndrome et al? Its completely irrelevant to this discussion, like bringing up cases of people born with one leg in a discussion about whether humans are bipedal organisms. its fundamentally irrelevant.
Original post by RandZul'Zorander
Thank you for proving my point. Sex is not as simple as you tried to make it out to be. :h:


yes it is.

If you think those definitions were complicated or in any way contradictory, you're simply out of your depth in this discussion I'm afraid.
Original post by minimarshmallow
There are at least four different definitions there...



... all of which say exactly the same thing.
Original post by cole-slaw
Its not actually seriously contested though, there is no danger of the definition changing any time, ever.

Either use the current definition or stop spamming the thread with your unpleasant transphobic comments.


Except it is contested as I have provided dozens of links to not only lay people but scientists and doctors who have published on it. Do explain how its not contested then. :rolleyes:

Furthermore, you should stop calling me transphobic as you don't even know what I am saying.

Original post by cole-slaw
The definition is what it is. This thread does not exist for him to complain that he doesn't like the definition. If he doesn't like it, he can start another thread where he can complain about it.


I have made my further point. The definition of sex is wholly central to the issue in this thread. i.e. the legitimacy of someone feeling like they are or should be a different sex and whether that can be reflected objectively.


That is their gender that is listed as a simple courtesy. Their actual sex remains unchanged. I'm sure you're not so stupid as to think that what it says on someone's driving licence is relevant to a biological fact.


You do understand that it can also be changed on birth certificates etc? And that doctors have expressed this as a change in 'sex' not gender (although in fairness many doctors don't use language to distinguish the two).
Original post by RandZul'Zorander
...



Stop repeating yourself. This thread is not here for you to complain you don't like the biological definition of sex as given by every single medical dictionary.

If you continue to spam the thread I will be reporting every post to the mods as spam.


and continually bringing up intersex people in a discussion about transgenderism is deeply bigoted. How many times do I need to tell you They're NOT THE SAME THING.
Original post by cole-slaw
Sex: the fundamental distinction, found in most species of animals and plants, based on the type of gametes produced by the individual; also the category to which the individual fits on the basis of that criterion
- Not a real medical dictionary, but here is 1 definition.

sex
1. the fundamental distinction, found in most species of animals and plants, based on the type of gametes produced by the individual or the category to which the individual fits on the basis of that criterion. Ova, or macrogametes, are produced by the female, and spermatozoa, or microgametes, are produced by the male. The union of these distinctive germ cells results in the production of a new individual in sexual reproduction.


This coincides with the definition above.





McGraw-Hill Concise Dictionary of Modern Medicine. © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

sex (seks), 1. The biologic character or quality that distinguishes male and female from one another as expressed by analysis of the person's gonadal, morphologic (internal and external), chromosomal, and hormonal characteristics. Compare: gender.
2. The physiologic and psychological processes within a person that prompt behavior related to procreation or erotic pleasure.
[L. sexus]



Same as above. Not just gonads. = different definition.

sex biological quality distinguishing male and female, expressed by the presence of two X (i.e. female) or X + Y (i.e. male) chromosomes


Look a third definition! - this one only has 1 factor i.e. chromosomes. Gametes, morphology, hormones etc, are all disregarded here.

chromosomal sex , genetic sex sex as determined by the presence of the XX (female) or the XY (male) genotype in somatic cells, without regard to phenotypic manifestations.
gonadal sex that part of the phenotypic sex that is determined by the gonadal tissue present (ovarian or testicular).
morphological sex that part of the phenotypic sex that is determined by the morphology of the external genitals.
phenotypic sex the phenotypic manifestations of sex determined by endocrine influences.


If you can't realize that here you have identified multiple ways of determining sex then you should work on your reading comprehension skills as they are talk about different kinds of biological sex. So clearly there is not just 1 set definition.


Original post by cole-slaw
yes it is.

If you think those definitions were complicated or in any way contradictory, you're simply out of your depth in this discussion I'm afraid.



Original post by cole-slaw
... all of which say exactly the same thing.
Original post by RandZul'Zorander
- Not a real medical dictionary, but here is 1 definition.


This coincides with the definition above.



This does not match your first definition. Note the added criterion (emphasized by me).



Same as above. Not just gonads. = different definition.



Look a third definition! - this one only has 1 factor i.e. chromosomes. Gametes, morphology, hormones etc, are all disregarded here.



If you can't realize that here you have identified multiple ways of determining sex then you should work on your reading comprehension skills as they are talk about different kinds of biological sex. So clearly there is not just 1 set definition.



Do you understand the link between chromosomes and gamete formation that makes those definitions technically identical?

Sadly, I think you've revealed that you're simply out of your depth here, you're basically arguing that 3+1 and 2+2 are different numbers.

Anyone with any knowledge of biology would crack up when they read your posts on this thread. You're just highly ignorant and woefully misinformed, I suggest you stick to arguing about subject you actually know something about in future.
Original post by cole-slaw
Stop repeating yourself. This thread is not here for you to complain you don't like the biological definition of sex as given by every single medical dictionary.

If you continue to spam the thread I will be reporting every post to the mods as spam.


Minus the fact that my contention on the definition is relevant to base assumption of the thread. A fact you conveniently keep ignoring because you refuse to actually engage my argument.

and continually bringing up intersex people in a discussion about transgenderism is deeply bigoted. How many times do I need to tell you They're NOT THE SAME THING.

I haven't said they are the same. In fact I have continuously had to repeat that they are not because you clearly don't understand what I am saying.

Here I will put it very slowly and simply for you:
1. The 'conventional' definition of sex is either inaccurate or nonexistent (as there lacks to be one single definition for you to give me across multiple sources).
2. Intersex individuals can and do highlight the problems with our current model and definition of biological sex.
3. As biological sex doesn't seem to be merely down to 1 factor, but rather a balancing act of multiple factors sex may be fluid.
4. This is because some 'sex characteristics' are changeable, i.e. morphology, hormone levels, and phenotypes. So if we are balancing these characteristics then when they change the overall 'sum' or status changes too.
5. Therefore any assertion that a transsexual cannot change sex and is therefore is not 'really male/female' is not necessarily accurate.
Original post by cole-slaw
... all of which say exactly the same thing.


Nope.

One says chromosomes/genetics, one says phenotypes, one says gonads, one says morphological differences in the appearance of external genitals.
They're generally linked, often found to coincide, but they are all different.
Original post by RandZul'Zorander
Minus the fact that my contention on the definition is relevant to base assumption of the thread. A fact you conveniently keep ignoring because you refuse to actually engage my argument.


I haven't said they are the same. In fact I have continuously had to repeat that they are not because you clearly don't understand what I am saying.

Here I will put it very slowly and simply for you:
1. The 'conventional' definition of sex is either inaccurate or nonexistent (as there lacks to be one single definition for you to give me across multiple sources).
2. Intersex individuals can and do highlight the problems with our current model and definition of biological sex.
3. As biological sex doesn't seem to be merely down to 1 factor, but rather a balancing act of multiple factors sex may be fluid.
4. This is because some 'sex characteristics' are changeable, i.e. morphology, hormone levels, and phenotypes. So if we are balancing these characteristics then when they change the overall 'sum' or status changes too.
5. Therefore any assertion that a transsexual cannot change sex and is therefore is not 'really male/female' is not necessarily accurate.


When your "contention" is taken seriously enough by the professionals to adjust the dictionary definition, we'll talk. Until then I don't really care about your personal feelings about how good or bad the official definition is.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending