Back
to top
Why do feminists support women behaving like cheap sluts
Watch
Announcements
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Yet get upset over porn, lads mags, or anything that displays women in a sexual manner?
0
reply
Report
#3
(Original post by bertstare)
Yet get upset over porn, lads mags, or anything that displays women in a sexual manner?
Yet get upset over porn, lads mags, or anything that displays women in a sexual manner?
Define "cheap sluts"?
0
reply
Report
#4
I do not see anyone as a "cheap slut" as a woman's (and man's) value is not determined by their sexuality or sexual behaviour.
I also do not care about porn or lads mags.
I also do not care about porn or lads mags.
0
reply
Report
#5
If they get paid for it, they are victims of the objectifying, commodifying patriarchy.
If they give it up for free, they are making empowered choices as womyn.
If they give it up for free, they are making empowered choices as womyn.
1
reply
(Original post by thesabbath)
If they get paid for it, they are victims of the objectifying, commodifying patriarchy.
If they give it up for free, they are making empowered choices as womyn.
If they get paid for it, they are victims of the objectifying, commodifying patriarchy.
If they give it up for free, they are making empowered choices as womyn.
0
reply
Report
#8
(Original post by 6Jesus6Christ6)
Wrong. If a girl ain't gonna suck the holy ****, then her value goes down instantly.
Consider, who has more value to men in general: Amy Brooke (pornstar ho) or Christine Lagard (head of IMF, many others could do her job)
Wrong. If a girl ain't gonna suck the holy ****, then her value goes down instantly.
Consider, who has more value to men in general: Amy Brooke (pornstar ho) or Christine Lagard (head of IMF, many others could do her job)
You disgust me.
1
reply
Report
#9
(Original post by 6Jesus6Christ6)
Wrong. If a girl ain't gonna suck the holy ****, then her value goes down instantly.
Consider, who has more value to men in general: Amy Brooke (pornstar ho) or Christine Lagard (head of IMF, many others could do her job)
Wrong. If a girl ain't gonna suck the holy ****, then her value goes down instantly.
Consider, who has more value to men in general: Amy Brooke (pornstar ho) or Christine Lagard (head of IMF, many others could do her job)
0
reply
Report
#10
0
reply
Report
#11
To back myself up however, we can agree on this objective truth: some people have more value than others. It is my belief that the way a woman can raise her value to men (and women too, since jealousy is a form of acknowledgement of superiority) is through cultivating her sex appeal.
Of course one's value is entirely subjective, therefore not all people believe that one's sexiness holds value. But given the undeveloped nature of modern humans, I will hold my position on the matter.
0
reply
Report
#13
1
reply
Report
#14
(Original post by Yeah dude)
Why do both genders have to be separated like its a war is a better question
Posted from TSR Mobile
Why do both genders have to be separated like its a war is a better question
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Report
#15
I support women having the choice to do things they want to do. If that's have casual sex, fine. If that's be a pornstar, fine. There's equally nothing wrong with the people who view such material as long as it's all above board and consensual.
0
reply
Report
#16
(Original post by SophieSmall)
This. It really pisses me off.
This. It really pisses me off.
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Report
#17
Feminists support women, period. They can more or less do as they wish and their behaviour will be condoned as an empowered act of liberation from the patriarchy or male oppression.
Frankly I'm tired of feminism and wish we could abolish it and enforce equalism instead. Once we stop drawing on all these gender separations, we can start to explore true equality between the sexes. Yes we have biological distinctions, but they aren't the problem. These socially constructed gender separations are what's driving the conflict between the sexes.
Frankly I'm tired of feminism and wish we could abolish it and enforce equalism instead. Once we stop drawing on all these gender separations, we can start to explore true equality between the sexes. Yes we have biological distinctions, but they aren't the problem. These socially constructed gender separations are what's driving the conflict between the sexes.
0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
