This discussion is closed.
Lawz-
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#21
Report 16 years ago
#21
(Original post by PadFoot90)
Aren't they very close, or even passing the US in thier number of soliders?

They have a MUCH larger army in terms of numbers.... I forget the actual figures
0
Apollo
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#22
Report 16 years ago
#22
(Original post by Lawzzzzzz)
They have a MUCH larger army in terms of numbers.... I forget the actual figures
I know china has 2.5 million, i forget the US
0
jamlan
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#23
Report 16 years ago
#23
(Original post by PadFoot90)
I know china has 2.5 million, i forget the US
According to this, the US army is 482,000 strong while the total armed forces have 1.2 million people
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...14_army29.html
0
Sam2k
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#24
Report 16 years ago
#24
(Original post by Lawzzzzzz)
Thats not strictly true - the purpose is to protect the US - the benefit (whether it comes or not) is a welcomed bi-product

Yes it is. Protection of the U.S. is one goal. Spreading freedom is another.
0
Lee86
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#25
Report 16 years ago
#25
(Original post by moncal)
Yes it is. Protection of the U.S. is one goal. Spreading freedom is another.
but are they better off free? in the case or iraq they were safer with sadam in power.
forget bin laden or sadam the greatest threat to world peace is george W ( hummmm wonder what that stands for) bush.
the sooner hes out of power the better and he can take his puppet blair with him. i hope the two are very happy together, live a nice life, have lots of children together, but r never seen again.
0
Lawz-
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#26
Report 16 years ago
#26
(Original post by moncal)
Yes it is. Protection of the U.S. is one goal. Spreading freedom is another.
Its a welcomed possibility that can be worked towards - the US does not intervene in nations to spread freedom - Half of Africa and The Middle east know that ....
0
Lawz-
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#27
Report 16 years ago
#27
(Original post by Lee86)
but are they better off free? in the case or iraq they were safer with sadam in power.
forget bin laden or sadam the greatest threat to world peace is george W ( hummmm wonder what that stands for) bush.
the sooner hes out of power the better and he can take his puppet blair with him. i hope the two are very happy together, live a nice life, have lots of children together, but r never seen again.

This makes no sense really - you may say they arent better off but only about 20% of Iraqi's agree with you ... so I see no basis for the claim...

Also I get sick of people calling Blair his puppet - JUST BECAUSE they came to the same decision - why does that mean that he HAS to be doing it because Bush is? Theres just NO proof to that fact - its just a nice way for people who dont like the war or Blair to insult him ...
0
Sam2k
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#28
Report 16 years ago
#28
(Original post by Lee86)
but are they better off free? in the case or iraq they were safer with sadam in power.
forget bin laden or sadam the greatest threat to world peace is george W ( hummmm wonder what that stands for) bush.
the sooner hes out of power the better and he can take his puppet blair with him. i hope the two are very happy together, live a nice life, have lots of children together, but r never seen again.

Of course they are better of free. Everybody is better off free. Have you ever considered the posibility that blair just has some common sense?
0
Lee86
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#29
Report 16 years ago
#29
(Original post by moncal)
Of course they are better of free. Everybody is better off free. Have you ever considered the posibility that blair just has some common sense?
no-one is truly free anyway, we must all live by some rules and confides we have just made them free in the terms of the western meaning of free.
and as for common sense and Mr im so far up bushs' a**e you dont know where he ends and i start Blair, lets just say it doesn't seem to be a happy relationship, although it seems to be a problem shared my many political leaders.
0
operato
Badges: 0
#30
Report 16 years ago
#30
bush has to answer to congress and in that fact he is not a danger to the world. anyways most of american politics is under the control of industry whether they choose to believe so or not. what is freedom today anyways? eating american food? listening to american music? dressing in american clothes? there's going to be nothing left of this world. i can see that's the future.
0
Amb1
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#31
Report 16 years ago
#31
http://www.uk-learning.net/t39473.html
0
Sire
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#32
Report 16 years ago
#32
(Original post by operato)
world war cannot exist as there are too many alliances and pacts. say for instance america attacks somewhere, there would be the UN or so to deal with. the warfare of tomorrow will consist of terrorism, that way you can never lose.
What do you mean if the US attacks anywhere, there would be the UN or so to deal with? I know that is the way it is supposed to be, but ust look at what happened in Iraq. The UN was completely ignored by George Dubya Bush and his allies.
0
Sam2k
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#33
Report 16 years ago
#33
(Original post by Sire)
What do you mean if the US attacks anywhere, there would be the UN or so to deal with? I know that is the way it is supposed to be, but ust look at what happened in Iraq. The UN was completely ignored by George Dubya Bush and his allies.

That is because the UN refused to do what was neccesary.
0
Lawz-
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#34
Report 16 years ago
#34
(Original post by moncal)
That is because the UN refused to do what was neccesary.

Thats a wonderful attitude -

what the US wants = necessary
Therefore
If UN disagrees = They refuse to do what is necessary
0
RoyFester
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#35
Report 16 years ago
#35
Democracy Vs. Islam

2020 A.D.

Get your tickets now.
0
Saintsin
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#36
Report 16 years ago
#36
If WW3 was inedible it would be USA + (EU and some other democracies) Vs China and their allies. If you play computer games you will notice China is usually the enemy, since the USSR collapsed and Nazi's are history.

If it became total war, as in everything or nothing, then USA would win as their nuclear capability far outmatched the Soviets; China had a much smaller arsenal. Technologically USA has state of the art weapons and defence capabilities, much of it we probably we don’t know, the Chinese just managed to put a man in space last year.

Invading USA would be very hard as I think there aren’t any communist allies on the continent, on the other hand invading China could be easier as Europe could be the bridge and logistics theatre thus making it a world war.
0
Sam2k
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#37
Report 16 years ago
#37
(Original post by Saintsin)
Invading USA would be very hard as I think there aren’t any communist allies on the continent, on the other hand invading China could be easier as Europe could be the bridge and logistics theatre thus making it a world war.

Plus everybody and their dog has a gun in the U.S.

Thats a wonderful attitude -
That's not what I said. I merely stated since the the UN did nothing then they did much less than neccesary.
0
Lawz-
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#38
Report 16 years ago
#38
(Original post by moncal)
Plus everybody and their dog has a gun in the U.S.



That's not what I said. I merely stated since the the UN did nothing then they did much less than neccesary.

I misunderstood - apologies
0
jamlan
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#39
Report 16 years ago
#39
(Original post by Maddock)
Democracy Vs. Islam

2020 A.D.

Get your tickets now.
so where does that leave Turkey (an Islamic democracy)? Would they have to play the role of Switzerland in this one?
0
drago di giada
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#40
Report 16 years ago
#40
Anyone care to tell me what arguments people are using? Or must I go through and read them?
0
X
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

If you do not get the A-level grades you want this summer, what is your likely next step?

Take autumn exams (240)
47.06%
Take exams next summer (69)
13.53%
Change uni choice through clearing (111)
21.76%
Apply to uni next year instead (53)
10.39%
I'm not applying to university (37)
7.25%

Watched Threads

View All