That's kind of the point. Relative abundance. Available, interested, older guys with nouse, experience, interest/intrigue and, critically, maturity/stability, a far stronger sense of self and higher security value e.g. paternalistic/bread winner credentials, are relatively scarce; this makes us a relatively prized commodity. It's basic economics
Depends on the guy tbhDepends on the guy tbhe.g. I dated a 19 year old Russian chick earlier this year. Also hooked up with a 22 year old (from TSR in fact) not so long ago. Wasn't anything creepy about either, at all
Depends on the guy tbhe.g. I'm not even technically independent, never mind wealthy
No, perhaps you could enlighten us
True, and your responses did make me chuckle.. you kinda owned the guy, but your comments are slightly misdirected and OTT
He's not enabling anything, the OP is going to do as he pleases regardless of what any of us say, he seems to be wired that way
I'd rather settle with a girl whom won't age for another 10-20 years than one whom is already beginning to, given the choice
I’m not convinced he’s all that interested in meeting ‘nice’ girls being as his lifestyle seems to revolve around banging these young broads (in which case student clubs must be the place to go)
Don't really see why really, so long as he's not being a creeper. Why hold someone else's personal choices when it comes to mating/dating against them if everyone is consenting and everyone is happy? (unless you're jealous/butthurt)
1. Men and women are not the same, so it is in no way equivalent
2. It's not called Oceana anymore
Agreed, especially when kids come into the equation. Does neither parent, nor offspring, any good (speaking from personal experience + a learned appreciation of the stats/related health and welfare literature)