# how do I solve this?Watch

#1
I already got the answer, but it involved some guessing, what would be the best way to solve this (qb)
0
4 years ago
#2
Divide by four, write as surds then work backwards to get n on its own.

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
#3
Could you write out the steps one by one?, and how would you be able to write it as a surd?
0
4 years ago
#4
(Original post by SidTheSloth1)
Could you write out the steps one by one?, and how would you be able to write it as a surd?
Write 4 and 8 in terms of powers of 2. Take it from there. Recall the rules of indices.
0
4 years ago
#5
Start by changing the 8 and 4 into powers of 2.
0
4 years ago
#6
(Original post by aoxa)
Divide by four, write as surds then work backwards to get n on its own.

Posted from TSR Mobile
I don't honestly see this as useful advice.
0
#7
So I would write 2^2n^3/2 = 2^3/8 ? I would understand better if someone wrote out each step
0
4 years ago
#8
(Original post by SidTheSloth1)
I already got the answer, but it involved some guessing, what would be the best way to solve this (qb)
Before you do anything else, do you know what actually is? If you can work that out you'll make things considerably simpler for yourself.
0
4 years ago
#9
(Original post by SidTheSloth1)
I already got the answer, but it involved some guessing, what would be the best way to solve this (qb)

(Original post by SidTheSloth1)
So I would write 2^2n^3/2 = 2^3/8 ? I would understand better if someone wrote out each step
You could do that. But I made the question more complicated. It'd be simpler, as davros suggests, to just evaluate and take it from there.
Still, I suppose you could say that as then .
0
#10
I did do what davros suggested to get the answer, but I feel that it was mostly guessing, also on the equation you posted, after you fer to that stage, then what do you do?. would you make n the subject by diving by 2^2?
0
4 years ago
#11
(Original post by SidTheSloth1)
I did do what davros suggested to get the answer, but I feel that it was mostly guessing, also on the equation you posted, after you fer to that stage, then what do you do?. would you make n the subject by diving by 2^2?
You can do that, yea . Or consider it multiplying the equation by .
0
4 years ago
#12
(Original post by SidTheSloth1)
I did do what davros suggested to get the answer, but I feel that it was mostly guessing, also on the equation you posted, after you fer to that stage, then what do you do?. would you make n the subject by diving by 2^2?
It's not really "guessing" because
(a) you should be able to recognize powers of 2
(b) in an exam you're probably going to be given something like this where the numbers work out conveniently, rather than some random numbers with roots that you cannot evaluate more easily.

If you want something more systematic, then you should be looking at writing both 4 and 8 as powers of 2, and then setting up an equation that lets you write n as a power of 2 also.
0
#13
Okay, thanks for the help, also I prefer a systematic method because it makes me understand it better
0
X

new posts
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### University open days

• Cranfield University
Cranfield Forensic MSc Programme Open Day Postgraduate
Thu, 25 Apr '19
• University of the Arts London
Open day: MA Footwear and MA Fashion Artefact Postgraduate
Thu, 25 Apr '19
• Cardiff Metropolitan University
Sat, 27 Apr '19

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### Have you registered to vote?

Yes! (266)
38.61%
No - but I will (46)
6.68%
No - I don't want to (51)
7.4%
No - I can't vote (<18, not in UK, etc) (326)
47.31%