Rape Charity Against Prosecuting False Accusers Watch

Evening
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#1
109 women prosecuted for false rape claims in five years, say campaigners

Charity accuses authorities in the UK of pursuing cases against rape complainants more aggressively than other countries

At least 109 women have been prosecuted in the last five years for making false rape allegations in the UK, according to campaigners who are calling for an end to what they claim is the aggressive pursuit of such cases.


On Tuesday, the charity Women Against Rape (War) is taking its campaign to the House of Commons, where some of those who have been jailed for lying about rape allegations will speak out against their treatment by the authorities.


The vast majority of the convictions in the last five years, 98 out of 109, involved prosecutions for perverting the course of justice – which carries a maximum life jail term – rather than the lesser offence of wasting police time, which has a maximum tariff of six months in prison or a fine.


A US law professor, who will be speaking at the Commons, said the UK’s stance on false allegations is more aggressive than in countries such as the United States, Canada and Australia. Prof Lisa Avalos, of the University of Arkansas, said false allegations in the US were dealt with as a misdemeanour offence, not a felony – and most women were not jailed if found guilty.


“In the course of my research I have not found any country that pursues these cases against women rape complainants in the way the UK does. The UK has an unusual approach and I think their approach violates human rights,” she said.


In 2012/13 there were 3,692 prosecutions for rape in England and Wales, resulting in 2,333 convictions.


WAR says it is supporting several women who say they were forced into retracting their rape complaint by police and then told they would be prosecuted for perverting the course of justice.


But Prof Claire Ferguson, a forensic criminologist from the University of New England in New South Wales, Australia, said it was not the norm to prosecute women for false allegations and that only those in the most egregious cases were charged, often where the accused man had spent time in custody.


“There have been cases in Australia where people have been accused, then nothing ever happens to the accuser, even though the police believe the report is indeed false.


“This can be hugely problematic and has led to many personal and professional issues for the accused [including suicide], even when the police have proven that they did nothing wrong and are not a sex offender,” she said.



Source: http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/...ions?CMP=fb_gu



I think it's ridiculous that WAR would want not to prosecute women who falsely accuse men of rape, especially since it increases the likelihood of real rape victims not being taken seriously.

To not prosecute false accusers is a huge injustice for those who have been wrongly accused. It damages their life irreparably and they must forever be tarnished with the accusation.

Anonyminity should be needed for both accusers and the accused until there is a verdict; then proceed as normal.
0
reply
caravaggio2
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#2
Report 4 years ago
#2
This has been WARs stance for a long time.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Brexit: Given the chance now, would you vote leave or remain?

Remain (1366)
79.7%
Leave (348)
20.3%

Watched Threads

View All
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise