Looking through past exam questions I found a scenario relating to manslaughter which seemed ambiguous to me. The scenario reads as follows:
'Michael was driving to work when he realised that he had forgotten to bring an important document that he needed. Without thinking, he suddenly tried to swing his car round to go back in the opposite direction. However he lost control of the car, struck a kerb and crushed Nick a passing cyclist.'
The mark scheme (http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects...-WRE-JUN12.PDF) specifies that unlawful act manslaughter was incorrect:
"Since unlawful act manslaughter requires proof, inter alia, of the commission of a crime other than one of negligence, unlawful act manslaughter was clearly not the appropriate form of involuntary manslughter."
However there is a crime: dangerous driving as specified in part 1 (s2) of the Road Traffic Act 1991. This crime is innately dangerous as specified in (s2A) of the act. Obviously the act caused death.
I understand that in reality Michael would be charged with causing death by dangerous drving and also that gross negligence man****hter is applicabble however why is unlawful act excluded as wrong by the mark scheme?
x Turn on thread page Beta
Unlawful act dangerous driving exam question help watch
- Thread Starter
- 04-12-2014 10:52
- 09-12-2014 14:40
While you're waiting for an answer, did you know we have 300,000 study resources that could answer your question in TSR's Learn together section?
We have everything from Teacher Marked Essays to Mindmaps and Quizzes to help you with your work. Take a look around.
If you're stuck on how to get started, try creating some resources. It's free to do and can help breakdown tough topics into manageable chunks. Get creating now.
Not sure what all of this is about? Head here to find out more.