The Student Room Group

What is my mistake in this proof by induction algebra?

I must be making a mistake in the algebra in the induction step.

Question. A sequence u1, u2, u3, ... is defined by

U1 = 7/2 and un=12un1+n2u_{n} = \frac{1}{2}u_{n-1} + n^2 for n >= 2.

Prove by induction that un=2n24n+6(12)n u_{n} = 2n^2 - 4n + 6 - (\frac{1}{2})^n and for all positive integers n.

Here is my working.

LHS.
u1=12(72)+22=74+164=234u_{1} = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{7}{2}) + 2^2 = \frac{7}{4} + \frac{16}{4} = \frac{23}{4}

RHS
u1=2(2)24(2)+6122=234u_{1} = 2 (2)^2 - 4 (2) + 6 - \frac{1}{2}^2 = \frac{23}{4}

Step 2. Assume true for n=k, prove for n = k+1.

LHS
uk+1=12(2k24k+6(12)k)+k2u_{k+1} = \frac{1}{2}(2k^2 - 4k + 6 - (\frac{1}{2})^k) + k^2

k22k+312k+k2k^2 - 2k + 3 - \frac{1}{2}^k + k^2

=2k22k+312k+1= 2k^2 - 2k + 3 - \frac{1}{2}^{k+1}


RHS
2(k+1)24(k+1)+612k+1 2 (k+1)^2 - 4 (k+1) + 6 - \frac{1}{2}^{k+1}

2k2+4k+24k4+612k+1 2k^2 +4k + 2 -4k - 4 + 6 - \frac{1}{2}^{k+1}

2k2+412k+1 2k^2 + 4 - \frac{1}{2}^{k+1}

2(k2+2)12k+1 2 (k^2 + 2) - \frac{1}{2}^{k+1}

And lhs is not same as rhs :frown:
Your initial formula for "LHS" is not right (you need an extra +k^2 inside the bracket, and a +(k+1)^2 outside the bracket instead of +k^2).
Less of an issue but you need to be careful with notation. In your base case you have said u1=...u_1=... but before that you have said unu_n is only defined for n2n\geq 2.
Original post by poorform
Less of an issue but you need to be careful with notation. In your base case you have said u1=...u_1=... but before that you have said unu_n is only defined for n2n\geq 2.
Actually, no. u_1 is defined, and then for n > 1, u_n is defined in terms of u_{n-1}. It's completely standard notation.
Original post by DFranklin
Actually, no. u_1 is defined, and then for n > 1, u_n is defined in terms of u_{n-1}. It's completely standard notation.


But u1=72\displaystyle u_1=\frac{7}{2} not 234\displaystyle \frac {23}{4} so he should have put u2u_2
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by poorform
But u1=72\displaystyle u_1=\frac{7}{2} not 234\displaystyle \frac {23}{4} so he should have put u2u_2
Oh OK, yes, that's wrong (but it's not notation, it's just wrong).
Original post by DFranklin
Oh OK, yes, that's wrong (but it's not notation, it's just wrong).


Yes I see what you mean sorry my English isn't the greatest!

Quick Reply

Latest