This discussion is now closed.
Check out other Related discussions
- Harrassment.
- BTEC IT Unit 2 January 2024 exam discussion
- How many marks will you lose for an error in referencing?
- loughborough architecture or ucl architecture?
- MSc Psychology Conversion Online - Which Uni?!
- My terrible college is threatening to kick us out if we fail our mocks
- Higher Psychology - what's it like ?
- who else is sad for liam payne?
- do teachers not care?
- help i was reported to edexcel
- UCAS plagiarism
- does he like me??????/
- how do i get a tax refund if i overpaid?
- Huw Edwards named as BBC presenter accused of paying teenager for explicit photos
- MP filmed in heated exchange as assault reported to police
- Hsbc off cycle ib internship 2025
- Guys my teacher is committing fraud with coursework****
- how can i be nice to bullies?
- crossdressing on campus
- Can my flatmate ban my boyfriend from my bedroom?
So how true is this report, really?
Are you cool? Oddball questioning of Oxford, Cambridge applicants
I personally never had such questions for my interview last year, but what about you? I don't think this phenomenon is as widespread as the article makes it seem to be.
Curiously enough, the article also mentions that Cambridge offers PPE.
LONDON, Oct 13, 2006 (AFP) - At what point is a person dead? And how does a perm work? You may need to talk your way out of questions like these to get into Britain's elite universities, a survey of applicants showed Friday.
They were some of the more curious questions pitched by interviewers at Oxford and Cambridge looking to find the very best among the thousands of students trying to get on courses at the prestige institutions.
The survey of around 1,200 students by Oxbridge Applications, which advises applicants, showed the interview process was living up to its reputation for being notoriously tough.
Among the questions reported by students included:
-- Here is a piece of bark, please talk about it. (Biological Sciences, Oxford)
-- Are you cool? (Philosophy, Politics and Economics, Oxford)
-- At what point is a person "dead"? (Medicine, Cambridge)
-- Put a monetary value on this teapot. (Philosophy, Politics and Economics, Cambridge)
Other questions, though it was not clear who asked them, included: What percentage of the world's water is contained in a cow; of all 19th-century politicians, who was most like Tony Blair?
Jessica Elsom, of Oxbridge Applications, said the interview process was "notoriously eccentric" as the universities try to recruit the sharpest-witted among youngsters with flawless British school-leaving exam results.
"With the increase in the numbers of students excelling at A-level, the Oxbridge interviews are one way of finding out who really cuts the mustard," she said.
The Times Higher Educational Supplement's World University Rankings, published earlier this month, ranked Cambridge as the second best, followed by Oxford in third place.
Harvard University in the United States topped the list.
They were some of the more curious questions pitched by interviewers at Oxford and Cambridge looking to find the very best among the thousands of students trying to get on courses at the prestige institutions.
The survey of around 1,200 students by Oxbridge Applications, which advises applicants, showed the interview process was living up to its reputation for being notoriously tough.
Among the questions reported by students included:
-- Here is a piece of bark, please talk about it. (Biological Sciences, Oxford)
-- Are you cool? (Philosophy, Politics and Economics, Oxford)
-- At what point is a person "dead"? (Medicine, Cambridge)
-- Put a monetary value on this teapot. (Philosophy, Politics and Economics, Cambridge)
Other questions, though it was not clear who asked them, included: What percentage of the world's water is contained in a cow; of all 19th-century politicians, who was most like Tony Blair?
Jessica Elsom, of Oxbridge Applications, said the interview process was "notoriously eccentric" as the universities try to recruit the sharpest-witted among youngsters with flawless British school-leaving exam results.
"With the increase in the numbers of students excelling at A-level, the Oxbridge interviews are one way of finding out who really cuts the mustard," she said.
The Times Higher Educational Supplement's World University Rankings, published earlier this month, ranked Cambridge as the second best, followed by Oxford in third place.
Harvard University in the United States topped the list.
I personally never had such questions for my interview last year, but what about you? I don't think this phenomenon is as widespread as the article makes it seem to be.
Curiously enough, the article also mentions that Cambridge offers PPE.
Scroll to see replies
"When is a person dead?" hardly seems an unreasonable question in a medicine interview.
The Blair question is, I think, a brilliant one, being open ended enough to get a candidate talking about all the 19th century politicians they know whilst showing how much they know of current politics. Seems tough, but maybe they reserve it for people daft enough to apply to Cambridge for PPE!
In my subject, Maths, questions, even when ridiculous, tend not to make good soundbites because the general reader and/or journalist doesn't understand them and/or isn't interested. e.g. "here is a side of a4, prove the Riemann Hypothesis" might only generate a letter to the telegraph from candidate's agitated parents because the interviewer didn't say please and so fazed young Jonny/Jenny with their lack of manners.
The Blair question is, I think, a brilliant one, being open ended enough to get a candidate talking about all the 19th century politicians they know whilst showing how much they know of current politics. Seems tough, but maybe they reserve it for people daft enough to apply to Cambridge for PPE!
In my subject, Maths, questions, even when ridiculous, tend not to make good soundbites because the general reader and/or journalist doesn't understand them and/or isn't interested. e.g. "here is a side of a4, prove the Riemann Hypothesis" might only generate a letter to the telegraph from candidate's agitated parents because the interviewer didn't say please and so fazed young Jonny/Jenny with their lack of manners.
Jessica Elsom, of Oxbridge Applications, said the interview process was "notoriously eccentric" as the universities try to recruit the sharpest-witted among youngsters with flawless British school-leaving exam results.
Simple as, innit.
Oxbridge Applications is known for misleading advice. It seems to me that they are deliberately distributing this sort of nonsense to boost numbers for their training weekends, which cost £850.
I heard all these, "Cambridge will ask you to describe a banana, throw an apple at you to test your reflexes, blah blah," but ultimately my interview was strictly maths based, and I reckon most people (and definitely most scientists) will have subject based interviews. As it should be.
I heard all these, "Cambridge will ask you to describe a banana, throw an apple at you to test your reflexes, blah blah," but ultimately my interview was strictly maths based, and I reckon most people (and definitely most scientists) will have subject based interviews. As it should be.
and the questions really are not that outlandish, at least the example that they listed for biological sciences. most of the people in my year got presented with some sort of biological object (for me, that was a collection of snail shells, a friend of mine got a giant seed) and were asked to talk about it. it really makes sense though, because it asks you to apply what you have learned to a real example and tests whether you understand the general concepts of biology or whether you just learn everything by heart.
dragons_circle
Oxbridge Applications is known for misleading advice. It seems to me that they are deliberately distributing this sort of nonsense to boost numbers for their training weekends, which cost £850.
I heard all these, "Cambridge will ask you to describe a banana, throw an apple at you to test your reflexes, blah blah," but ultimately my interview was strictly maths based, and I reckon most people (and definitely most scientists) will have subject based interviews. As it should be.
I heard all these, "Cambridge will ask you to describe a banana, throw an apple at you to test your reflexes, blah blah," but ultimately my interview was strictly maths based, and I reckon most people (and definitely most scientists) will have subject based interviews. As it should be.
Quite right. While some of those questions may have been asked, the whole thing is motivated by the greed of 'Oxbridge Applications'.
It's pure self-publicism, and undoes some of the good work that Cambridge Access initiatives try to achieve. 'Oxbridge Applications' are only trying to muddy the waters to make applicants more worried about the interview process, and convince them to throw money at them.
My questions for NatSci were subject based but slightly off-centre.
"Why do you sing better in the bath?" and "is there more carbon on the land or in the oceans?". Someone else I spoke to got "why don't plants have brains?"
The idea is to ask something you will not have prepared for and that has a fairly open answer so they can prompt and push to see how you think.
"Why do you sing better in the bath?" and "is there more carbon on the land or in the oceans?". Someone else I spoke to got "why don't plants have brains?"
The idea is to ask something you will not have prepared for and that has a fairly open answer so they can prompt and push to see how you think.
Do you think the questions you are asked in the interview (eccentric ones) properly reflect how you are taught and what is expected of you while at Oxbridge?
shady lane
Do you think the questions you are asked in the interview (eccentric ones) properly reflect how you are taught and what is expected of you while at Oxbridge?
Should they? Aren't they supposed to be an indicator to the interviewer of your suitability to how the course it taught, and what you are expected?
More to the point, has anyone ****ed up the answer to these questions and still got in?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/6046878.stm
This article is so unbalanced I wonder if the author is Oxbridge Applications. The BBC’s reporter was evidently too lazy and thick to realise that these so-called ‘experts’ have a financial interest in talking about ‘increasingly eccentric’ interviews given that they can pocket £800 for interview ‘preparation’ weekends to tackle those ‘eccentric’ questions…
On the BBC’s article there is no mention of the use of the personal statement and/or essays at interview…It’s a completely inaccurate representation and gives a false impression. Complain to the BBC!
This article is so unbalanced I wonder if the author is Oxbridge Applications. The BBC’s reporter was evidently too lazy and thick to realise that these so-called ‘experts’ have a financial interest in talking about ‘increasingly eccentric’ interviews given that they can pocket £800 for interview ‘preparation’ weekends to tackle those ‘eccentric’ questions…
On the BBC’s article there is no mention of the use of the personal statement and/or essays at interview…It’s a completely inaccurate representation and gives a false impression. Complain to the BBC!
As well as PPE at Cambridge, they also mention Classical Archaeology and Ancient History at Cambridge (that's an Oxford course too), and on their website they mention Nigella Lawson studied "Medieval and Modern Languages" at Oxford (when in Oxford they just call it Modern Languages). All this does imply that they don't know as much about Oxbridge as they claim.
shady lane
Do you think the questions you are asked in the interview (eccentric ones) properly reflect how you are taught and what is expected of you while at Oxbridge?
Yes, in style. When it comes to exams and essay questions, they tend to be on the exceptions to the rule. Slightly strange cases. I've had questions asking me to examine the demand for addictive goods (a very common first week microeconomics questions), ones looking at the optimal life of a patent, the reasons for criminal behaviour, etc. These would all seem a little off in an interview, but are designed to make people think in a certain style.
Asking those questions above makes someone think, rather than give an answer they know. That means you get to see the way they think, how they come to their answer. That's exactly what tutors want to see.
This is a piece of propoganda released by 'oxbridge applications' designed to scaremonger people into buying their services. Sure, some of these questions may have been asked, but i think theyve been seriously taken out of context, and don't represent the sort of questions that would usually be asked.
Related discussions
- Harrassment.
- BTEC IT Unit 2 January 2024 exam discussion
- How many marks will you lose for an error in referencing?
- loughborough architecture or ucl architecture?
- MSc Psychology Conversion Online - Which Uni?!
- My terrible college is threatening to kick us out if we fail our mocks
- Higher Psychology - what's it like ?
- who else is sad for liam payne?
- do teachers not care?
- help i was reported to edexcel
- UCAS plagiarism
- does he like me??????/
- how do i get a tax refund if i overpaid?
- Huw Edwards named as BBC presenter accused of paying teenager for explicit photos
- MP filmed in heated exchange as assault reported to police
- Hsbc off cycle ib internship 2025
- Guys my teacher is committing fraud with coursework****
- how can i be nice to bullies?
- crossdressing on campus
- Can my flatmate ban my boyfriend from my bedroom?
Latest
Trending
Last reply 8 hours ago
Oxbridge applicants for modern languages - 2025 entry (applying in 2024)Last reply 1 month ago
Year 12 Oxbridge hopefuls apply for Lucy Cavendish AAP.Last reply 1 month ago
How do youys feel about the TSA this year compared to the past papers?
