What is the functional group isomer of an aldehyde? specifically butanoic acid What is the positional group isomer of butan-1-ol.
Position group isomer of butan-1-ol would be butan-2-ol. (You move the position of the functional group)
The functional group isomer of an aldehyde is a ketone. (Both have the same molecular formula and both have carbonyl groups but they are attached in two different positions. CH3COCH3 (ketones have the C=O on an interior carbon) but CH3CH2CHO (aldehydes have it on an end carbon).
The functional group isomer of a carboxylic acid would be an ester, if I recall correctly.
Position group isomer of butan-1-ol would be butan-2-ol. (You move the position of the functional group)
The functional group isomer of an aldehyde is a ketone. (Both have the same molecular formula and both have carbonyl groups but they are attached in two different positions. CH3COCH3 (ketones have the C=O on an interior carbon) but CH3CH2CHO (aldehydes have it on an end carbon).
The functional group isomer of a carboxylic acid would be an ester, if I recall correctly.
So the functional group isomer of butanoic acid would be butanone? Surely butanone has one fewer oxygen?
Oh wait you said ester. How the hell do you draw an ester
if they ask for an equation and you write it as a displayed formula but mark scheme has it as molecular formula do you still get the marks?
this is for ocr f322
Unless they specify which form they want it in, then you should get the marks. In mark schemes, there's usually a sentence saying on the question saying which formulae are accepted, and it's usually skeletal, displayed and structural (more may be accepted but idk).
Unless they specify which form they want it in, then you should get the marks. In mark schemes, there's usually a sentence saying on the question saying which formulae are accepted, and it's usually skeletal, displayed and structural (more may be accepted but idk).
Ya, thanks. Was wondering what happens if they don't say that in the mark scheme and there's on one formula shown
Hi, do the intermolecular forces of halogenoalkanes decrease or increase down the group?
Because I swear the boiling points of halogenoalkanes increases down the group due to larger & more halogen atoms. So shouldn't their intermolecular forces increase too?
But a flashcard said that the C-X bonds get weaker as you go down due to shared electrons in a bond getting further from the halogen nucleus
Bond forming is exothermic Bond breaking is endothermic Bond enthalpy is the enthalpy change when breaking a mole of gaseous bonds to form gaseous atoms. So it is endothermic. However this reaction is exothermic because bonds are forming and bond enthalpy's sign is changed from + to - with same magnitude. So the bond enthalpy of products are bigger but when calculating the enthalpy change of the reaction using bond enthalpy you'd change the sign on the bond enthalpy of products to - so when added together with bond enthalpy of reactants the result ends up being negative = exothermic
Hi, do the intermolecular forces of halogenoalkanes decrease or increase down the group?
Because I swear the boiling points of halogenoalkanes increases down the group due to larger & more halogen atoms. So shouldn't their intermolecular forces increase too?
But a flashcard said that the C-X bonds get weaker as you go down due to shared electrons in a bond getting further from the halogen nucleus
Intermolecular forces of halogenoalkanes increase down the group because there are more electrons so stronger dispersion force.
About C-X bonds getting weaker, it has got nothing to do with the boiling point. You probably had it written down for the rate of hydrolysis of halogenoalkanes.