Hi, I've seen in lots of 'family trees of isomerism' and even in this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ni5IxKIuDnI) where diastereomers and enantiomers go under 'configurational isomers' only. However on this website (http://www.chem.uky.edu/research/gro...reoexamps.HTML) it shows how you can get CONFORMATIONAL diastereomers and enantiomers too (which makes sense to me).
Which one is correct?
Turn on thread page Beta
University Stereochemistry help!!-Conformational diastereomers/enantiomers? watch
- Thread Starter
- 27-12-2014 13:10